Automatic triage model execution in machine data driven monitoring automation apparatus with visualization

ABSTRACT

Network connections are established between machines of an operating environment to be monitored and a server group of a data intake and query system (DIQS). Data reflecting machine and component operations of the environment is conveyed via the network to the DIQS where it is reflected as timestamped entries in a field-searchable datastore. Monitoring components may search the datastore and identify and record instances of notable events. Triaging models are selectively applied against the notable event instances to produce an enhanced notable event instance representation with modeled results effective to automatically perform or assist in triaging the notable events so they are dispatched in an optimal, effective, and efficient, manner.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 15/276,750, entitled “Automatic Event Group Action Interface,” filed Sep. 26, 2016, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all valid purposes.

BACKGROUND

Modern data centers often comprise thousands of hosts that operate collectively to service requests from even larger numbers of remote clients. During operation, components of these data centers can produce significant volumes of machine-generated data. The unstructured nature of much of this data has made it challenging to perform indexing and searching operations because of the difficulty of applying semantic meaning to unstructured data. As the number of hosts and clients associated with a data center continues to grow, processing large volumes of machine-generated data in an intelligent manner and effectively presenting the results of such processing continues to be a priority.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present disclosure is illustrated by way of example, and not limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals indicate similar elements and in which:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example networked computer environment, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example data intake and query system, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an example cloud-based data intake and query system, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an example data intake and query system that performs searches across external data systems, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 5A is a flowchart of an example method that illustrates how indexers process, index, and store data received from forwarders, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 5B is a block diagram of a data structure in which time-stamped event data can be stored in a data store, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 5C provides a visual representation of the manner in which a pipelined search language or query operates, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 6A is a flow diagram of an example method that illustrates how a search head and indexers perform a search query, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 6B provides a visual representation of an example manner in which a pipelined command language or query operates, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 7A is a diagram of an example scenario where a common customer identifier is found among log data received from three disparate data sources, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 7B illustrates an example of processing keyword searches and field searches, in accordance with disclosed embodiments;

FIG. 7C illustrates an example of creating and using an inverted index, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 7D depicts a flowchart of example use of an inverted index in a pipelined search query, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 8A is an interface diagram of an example user interface for a search screen, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 8B is an interface diagram of an example user interface for a data summary dialog that enables a user to select various data sources, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIGS. 9-15 are interface diagrams of example report generation user interfaces, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 16 is an example search query received from a client and executed by search peers, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 17A is an interface diagram of an example user interface of a key indicators view, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 17B is an interface diagram of an example user interface of an incident review dashboard, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 17C is a tree diagram of an example a proactive monitoring tree, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 17D is an interface diagram of an example a user interface displaying both log data and performance data, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 18 is a block diagram of an example of a data intake and query system that supports the application level functionality of a lower-tier application, in accordance with example embodiments;

FIG. 19 depicts a system diagram of an operating environment including a notable event processing system in one embodiment;

FIG. 20 depicts a system diagram illustrating computing resources and processes implementing multiple phases of notable event processing in one embodiment;

FIG. 21 depicts an illustrative data structure for enhanced notable event data in one embodiment;

FIG. 22 depicts a system diagram for notable event processing including certain feedback in one embodiment;

FIG. 23 illustrates an example triaging model specification. Conceptual model 2300 is an equation useful for representing a linear regression-based model type;

FIGS. 24-26 depict computer-based implementations for representing triaging models;

FIG. 27 depicts a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of processing for scoring models;

FIG. 28 depicts a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of processing for action models;

FIG. 29 depicts a user interface display exhibiting triage model determinations in a navigable topology interface;

FIG. 30 depicts a user interface display exhibiting triage model determinations in a notable event triaging interface;

FIG. 31 depicts a user interface display exhibiting triage model rationale information;

FIG. 32 depicts a system diagram illustrating integration of notable event processing and event group processing in one embodiment;

FIG. 33 depicts a user interface display having interactive elements related to an integration of notable event processing and event group processing in one embodiment;

FIG. 34 depicts a user interface display manifesting elements related to a configured integration of notable event processing and event group processing in one embodiment;

FIG. 35 is a block diagram illustrating a high-level example of a hardware architecture of a computing system in which an embodiment may be implemented.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

1.0. General Overview

Modern data centers and other computing environments can comprise anywhere from a few host computer systems to thousands of systems configured to process data, service requests from remote clients, and perform numerous other computational tasks. During operation, various components within these computing environments often generate significant volumes of machine data. Machine data is any data produced by a machine or component in an information technology (IT) environment and that reflects activity in the IT environment. For example, machine data can be raw machine data that is generated by various components in IT environments, such as servers, sensors, routers, mobile devices, Internet of Things (IoT) devices, etc. Machine data can include system logs, network packet data, sensor data, application program data, error logs, stack traces, system performance data, etc. In general, machine data can also include performance data, diagnostic information, and many other types of data that can be analyzed to diagnose performance problems, monitor user interactions, and to derive other insights.

A number of tools are available to analyze machine data. In order to reduce the size of the potentially vast amount of machine data that may be generated, many of these tools typically pre-process the data based on anticipated data-analysis needs. For example, pre-specified data items may be extracted from the machine data and stored in a database to facilitate efficient retrieval and analysis of those data items at search time. However, the rest of the machine data typically is not saved and is discarded during pre-processing. As storage capacity becomes progressively cheaper and more plentiful, there are fewer incentives to discard these portions of machine data and many reasons to retain more of the data.

This plentiful storage capacity is presently making it feasible to store massive quantities of minimally processed machine data for later retrieval and analysis. In general, storing minimally processed machine data and performing analysis operations at search time can provide greater flexibility because it enables an analyst to search all of the machine data, instead of searching only a pre-specified set of data items. This may enable an analyst to investigate different aspects of the machine data that previously were unavailable for analysis.

However, analyzing and searching massive quantities of machine data presents a number of challenges. For example, a data center, servers, or network appliances may generate many different types and formats of machine data (e.g., system logs, network packet data (e.g., wire data, etc.), sensor data, application program data, error logs, stack traces, system performance data, operating system data, virtualization data, etc.) from thousands of different components, which can collectively be very time-consuming to analyze. In another example, mobile devices may generate large amounts of information relating to data accesses, application performance, operating system performance, network performance, etc. There can be millions of mobile devices that report these types of information.

These challenges can be addressed by using an event-based data intake and query system, such as the SPLUNK® ENTERPRISE system developed by Splunk Inc. of San Francisco, Calif. The SPLUNK® ENTERPRISE system is the leading platform for providing real-time operational intelligence that enables organizations to collect, index, and search machine data from various websites, applications, servers, networks, and mobile devices that power their businesses. The data intake and query system is particularly useful for analyzing data which is commonly found in system log files, network data, and other data input sources. Although many of the techniques described herein are explained with reference to a data intake and query system similar to the SPLUNK® ENTERPRISE system, these techniques are also applicable to other types of data systems.

In the data intake and query system, machine data are collected and stored as “events”. An event comprises a portion of machine data and is associated with a specific point in time. The portion of machine data may reflect activity in an IT environment and may be produced by a component of that IT environment, where the events may be searched to provide insight into the IT environment, thereby improving the performance of components in the IT environment. Events may be derived from “time series data,” where the time series data comprises a sequence of data points (e.g., performance measurements from a computer system, etc.) that are associated with successive points in time. In general, each event has a portion of machine data that is associated with a timestamp that is derived from the portion of machine data in the event. A timestamp of an event may be determined through interpolation between temporally proximate events having known timestamps or may be determined based on other configurable rules for associating timestamps with events.

In some instances, machine data can have a predefined format, where data items with specific data formats are stored at predefined locations in the data. For example, the machine data may include data associated with fields in a database table. In other instances, machine data may not have a predefined format (e.g., may not be at fixed, predefined locations), but may have repeatable (e.g., non-random) patterns. This means that some machine data can comprise various data items of different data types that may be stored at different locations within the data. For example, when the data source is an operating system log, an event can include one or more lines from the operating system log containing machine data that includes different types of performance and diagnostic information associated with a specific point in time (e.g., a timestamp).

Examples of components which may generate machine data from which events can be derived include, but are not limited to, web servers, application servers, databases, firewalls, routers, operating systems, and software applications that execute on computer systems, mobile devices, sensors, Internet of Things (IoT) devices, etc. The machine data generated by such data sources can include, for example and without limitation, server log files, activity log files, configuration files, messages, network packet data, performance measurements, sensor measurements, etc.

The data intake and query system uses a flexible schema to specify how to extract information from events. A flexible schema may be developed and redefined as needed. Note that a flexible schema may be applied to events “on the fly,” when it is needed (e.g., at search time, index time, ingestion time, etc.). When the schema is not applied to events until search time, the schema may be referred to as a “late-binding schema.”

During operation, the data intake and query system receives machine data from any type and number of sources (e.g., one or more system logs, streams of network packet data, sensor data, application program data, error logs, stack traces, system performance data, etc.). The system parses the machine data to produce events each having a portion of machine data associated with a timestamp. The system stores the events in a data store. The system enables users to run queries against the stored events to, for example, retrieve events that meet criteria specified in a query, such as criteria indicating certain keywords or having specific values in defined fields. As used herein, the term “field” refers to a location in the machine data of an event containing one or more values for a specific data item. A field may be referenced by a field name associated with the field. As will be described in more detail herein, a field is defined by an extraction rule (e.g., a regular expression) that derives one or more values or a sub-portion of text from the portion of machine data in each event to produce a value for the field for that event. The set of values produced are semantically-related (such as IP address), even though the machine data in each event may be in different formats (e.g., semantically-related values may be in different positions in the events derived from different sources).

As described above, the system stores the events in a data store. The events stored in the data store are field-searchable, where field-searchable herein refers to the ability to search the machine data (e.g., the raw machine data) of an event based on a field specified in search criteria. For example, a search having criteria that specifies a field name “UserID” may cause the system to field-search the machine data of events to identify events that have the field name “UserID.” In another example, a search having criteria that specifies a field name “UserID” with a corresponding field value “12345” may cause the system to field-search the machine data of events to identify events having that field-value pair (e.g., field name “UserID” with a corresponding field value of “12345”). Events are field-searchable using one or more configuration files associated with the events. Each configuration file includes one or more field names, where each field name is associated with a corresponding extraction rule and a set of events to which that extraction rule applies. The set of events to which an extraction rule applies may be identified by metadata associated with the set of events. For example, an extraction rule may apply to a set of events that are each associated with a particular host, source, or source type. When events are to be searched based on a particular field name specified in a search, the system uses one or more configuration files to determine whether there is an extraction rule for that particular field name that applies to each event that falls within the criteria of the search. If so, the event is considered as part of the search results (and additional processing may be performed on that event based on criteria specified in the search). If not, the next event is similarly analyzed, and so on.

As noted above, the data intake and query system utilizes a late-binding schema while performing queries on events. One aspect of a late-binding schema is applying extraction rules to events to extract values for specific fields during search time. More specifically, the extraction rule for a field can include one or more instructions that specify how to extract a value for the field from an event. An extraction rule can generally include any type of instruction for extracting values from events. In some cases, an extraction rule comprises a regular expression, where a sequence of characters form a search pattern. An extraction rule comprising a regular expression is referred to herein as a regex rule. The system applies a regex rule to an event to extract values for a field associated with the regex rule, where the values are extracted by searching the event for the sequence of characters defined in the regex rule.

In the data intake and query system, a field extractor may be configured to automatically generate extraction rules for certain fields in the events when the events are being created, indexed, or stored, or possibly at a later time. Alternatively, a user may manually define extraction rules for fields using a variety of techniques. In contrast to a conventional schema for a database system, a late-binding schema is not defined at data ingestion time. Instead, the late-binding schema can be developed on an ongoing basis until the time a query is actually executed. This means that extraction rules for the fields specified in a query may be provided in the query itself, or may be located during execution of the query. Hence, as a user learns more about the data in the events, the user can continue to refine the late-binding schema by adding new fields, deleting fields, or modifying the field extraction rules for use the next time the schema is used by the system. Because the data intake and query system maintains the underlying machine data and uses a late-binding schema for searching the machine data, it enables a user to continue investigating and learn valuable insights about the machine data.

In some embodiments, a common field name may be used to reference two or more fields containing equivalent and/or similar data items, even though the fields may be associated with different types of events that possibly have different data formats and different extraction rules. By enabling a common field name to be used to identify equivalent and/or similar fields from different types of events generated by disparate data sources, the system facilitates use of a “common information model” (CIM) across the disparate data sources (further discussed with respect to FIG. 7A).

2.0. Operating Environment

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example networked computer environment 100, in accordance with example embodiments. Those skilled in the art would understand that FIG. 1 represents one example of a networked computer system and other embodiments may use different arrangements.

The networked computer system 100 comprises one or more computing devices. These one or more computing devices comprise any combination of hardware and software configured to implement the various logical components described herein. For example, the one or more computing devices may include one or more memories that store instructions for implementing the various components described herein, one or more hardware processors configured to execute the instructions stored in the one or more memories, and various data repositories in the one or more memories for storing data structures utilized and manipulated by the various components.

In some embodiments, one or more client devices 102 are coupled to one or more host devices 106 and a data intake and query system 108 via one or more networks 104. Networks 104 broadly represent one or more LANs, WANs, cellular networks (e.g., LTE, HSPA, 3G, and other cellular technologies), and/or networks using any of wired, wireless, terrestrial microwave, or satellite links, and may include the public Internet.

2.1. Host Devices

In the illustrated embodiment, a system 100 includes one or more host devices 106. Host devices 106 may broadly include any number of computers, virtual machine instances, and/or data centers that are configured to host or execute one or more instances of host applications 114. In general, a host device 106 may be involved, directly or indirectly, in processing requests received from client devices 102. Each host device 106 may comprise, for example, one or more of a network device, a web server, an application server, a database server, etc. A collection of host devices 106 may be configured to implement a network-based service. For example, a provider of a network-based service may configure one or more host devices 106 and host applications 114 (e.g., one or more web servers, application servers, database servers, etc.) to collectively implement the network-based application.

In general, client devices 102 communicate with one or more host applications 114 to exchange information. The communication between a client device 102 and a host application 114 may, for example, be based on the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) or any other network protocol. Content delivered from the host application 114 to a client device 102 may include, for example, HTML documents, media content, etc. The communication between a client device 102 and host application 114 may include sending various requests and receiving data packets. For example, in general, a client device 102 or application running on a client device may initiate communication with a host application 114 by making a request for a specific resource (e.g., based on an HTTP request), and the application server may respond with the requested content stored in one or more response packets.

In the illustrated embodiment, one or more of host applications 114 may generate various types of performance data during operation, including event logs, network data, sensor data, and other types of machine data. For example, a host application 114 comprising a web server may generate one or more web server logs in which details of interactions between the web server and any number of client devices 102 is recorded. As another example, a host device 106 comprising a router may generate one or more router logs that record information related to network traffic managed by the router. As yet another example, a host application 114 comprising a database server may generate one or more logs that record information related to requests sent from other host applications 114 (e.g., web servers or application servers) for data managed by the database server.

2.2. Client Devices

Client devices 102 of FIG. 1 represent any computing device capable of interacting with one or more host devices 106 via a network 104. Examples of client devices 102 may include, without limitation, smart phones, tablet computers, handheld computers, wearable devices, laptop computers, desktop computers, servers, portable media players, gaming devices, and so forth. In general, a client device 102 can provide access to different content, for instance, content provided by one or more host devices 106, etc. Each client device 102 may comprise one or more client applications 110, described in more detail in a separate section hereinafter.

2.3. Client Device Applications

In some embodiments, each client device 102 may host or execute one or more client applications 110 that are capable of interacting with one or more host devices 106 via one or more networks 104. For instance, a client application 110 may be or comprise a web browser that a user may use to navigate to one or more websites or other resources provided by one or more host devices 106. As another example, a client application 110 may comprise a mobile application or “app.” For example, an operator of a network-based service hosted by one or more host devices 106 may make available one or more mobile apps that enable users of client devices 102 to access various resources of the network-based service. As yet another example, client applications 110 may include background processes that perform various operations without direct interaction from a user. A client application 110 may include a “plug-in” or “extension” to another application, such as a web browser plug-in or extension.

In some embodiments, a client application 110 may include a monitoring component 112. At a high level, the monitoring component 112 comprises a software component or other logic that facilitates generating performance data related to a client device's operating state, including monitoring network traffic sent and received from the client device and collecting other device and/or application-specific information. Monitoring component 112 may be an integrated component of a client application 110, a plug-in, an extension, or any other type of add-on component. Monitoring component 112 may also be a stand-alone process.

In some embodiments, a monitoring component 112 may be created when a client application 110 is developed, for example, by an application developer using a software development kit (SDK). The SDK may include custom monitoring code that can be incorporated into the code implementing a client application 110. When the code is converted to an executable application, the custom code implementing the monitoring functionality can become part of the application itself.

In some embodiments, an SDK or other code for implementing the monitoring functionality may be offered by a provider of a data intake and query system, such as a system 108. In such cases, the provider of the system 108 can implement the custom code so that performance data generated by the monitoring functionality is sent to the system 108 to facilitate analysis of the performance data by a developer of the client application or other users.

In some embodiments, the custom monitoring code may be incorporated into the code of a client application 110 in a number of different ways, such as the insertion of one or more lines in the client application code that call or otherwise invoke the monitoring component 112. As such, a developer of a client application 110 can add one or more lines of code into the client application 110 to trigger the monitoring component 112 at desired points during execution of the application. Code that triggers the monitoring component may be referred to as a monitor trigger. For instance, a monitor trigger may be included at or near the beginning of the executable code of the client application 110 such that the monitoring component 112 is initiated or triggered as the application is launched, or included at other points in the code that correspond to various actions of the client application, such as sending a network request or displaying a particular interface.

In some embodiments, the monitoring component 112 may monitor one or more aspects of network traffic sent and/or received by a client application 110. For example, the monitoring component 112 may be configured to monitor data packets transmitted to and/or from one or more host applications 114. Incoming and/or outgoing data packets can be read or examined to identify network data contained within the packets, for example, and other aspects of data packets can be analyzed to determine a number of network performance statistics. Monitoring network traffic may enable information to be gathered particular to the network performance associated with a client application 110 or set of applications.

In some embodiments, network performance data refers to any type of data that indicates information about the network and/or network performance. Network performance data may include, for instance, a URL requested, a connection type (e.g., HTTP, HTTPS, etc.), a connection start time, a connection end time, an HTTP status code, request length, response length, request headers, response headers, connection status (e.g., completion, response time(s), failure, etc.), and the like. Upon obtaining network performance data indicating performance of the network, the network performance data can be transmitted to a data intake and query system 108 for analysis.

Upon developing a client application 110 that incorporates a monitoring component 112, the client application 110 can be distributed to client devices 102. Applications generally can be distributed to client devices 102 in any manner, or they can be pre-loaded. In some cases, the application may be distributed to a client device 102 via an application marketplace or other application distribution system. For instance, an application marketplace or other application distribution system might distribute the application to a client device based on a request from the client device to download the application.

Examples of functionality that enables monitoring performance of a client device are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/524,748, entitled “UTILIZING PACKET HEADERS TO MONITOR NETWORK TRAFFIC IN ASSOCIATION WITH A CLIENT DEVICE”, filed on 27 Oct. 2014, and which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

In some embodiments, the monitoring component 112 may also monitor and collect performance data related to one or more aspects of the operational state of a client application 110 and/or client device 102. For example, a monitoring component 112 may be configured to collect device performance information by monitoring one or more client device operations, or by making calls to an operating system and/or one or more other applications executing on a client device 102 for performance information. Device performance information may include, for instance, a current wireless signal strength of the device, a current connection type and network carrier, current memory performance information, a geographic location of the device, a device orientation, and any other information related to the operational state of the client device.

In some embodiments, the monitoring component 112 may also monitor and collect other device profile information including, for example, a type of client device, a manufacturer and model of the device, versions of various software applications installed on the device, and so forth.

In general, a monitoring component 112 may be configured to generate performance data in response to a monitor trigger in the code of a client application 110 or other triggering application event, as described above, and to store the performance data in one or more data records. Each data record, for example, may include a collection of field-value pairs, each field-value pair storing a particular item of performance data in association with a field for the item. For example, a data record generated by a monitoring component 112 may include a “networkLatency” field (not shown in the Figure) in which a value is stored. This field indicates a network latency measurement associated with one or more network requests. The data record may include a “state” field to store a value indicating a state of a network connection, and so forth for any number of aspects of collected performance data.

2.4. Data Server System

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example data intake and query system 108, in accordance with example embodiments. System 108 includes one or more forwarders 204 that receive data from a variety of input data sources 202, and one or more indexers 206 that process and store the data in one or more data stores 208. These forwarders 204 and indexers 208 can comprise separate computer systems, or may alternatively comprise separate processes executing on one or more computer systems.

Each data source 202 broadly represents a distinct source of data that can be consumed by system 108. Examples of a data sources 202 include, without limitation, data files, directories of files, data sent over a network, event logs, registries, etc.

During operation, the forwarders 204 identify which indexers 206 receive data collected from a data source 202 and forward the data to the appropriate indexers. Forwarders 204 can also perform operations on the data before forwarding, including removing extraneous data, detecting timestamps in the data, parsing data, indexing data, routing data based on criteria relating to the data being routed, and/or performing other data transformations.

In some embodiments, a forwarder 204 may comprise a service accessible to client devices 102 and host devices 106 via a network 104. For example, one type of forwarder 204 may be capable of consuming vast amounts of real-time data from a potentially large number of client devices 102 and/or host devices 106. The forwarder 204 may, for example, comprise a computing device which implements multiple data pipelines or “queues” to handle forwarding of network data to indexers 206. A forwarder 204 may also perform many of the functions that are performed by an indexer. For example, a forwarder 204 may perform keyword extractions on raw data or parse raw data to create events. A forwarder 204 may generate time stamps for events. Additionally or alternatively, a forwarder 204 may perform routing of events to indexers 206. Data store 208 may contain events derived from machine data from a variety of sources all pertaining to the same component in an IT environment, and this data may be produced by the machine in question or by other components in the IT environment.

2.5. Cloud-Based System Overview

The example data intake and query system 108 described in reference to FIG. 2 comprises several system components, including one or more forwarders, indexers, and search heads. In some environments, a user of a data intake and query system 108 may install and configure, on computing devices owned and operated by the user, one or more software applications that implement some or all of these system components. For example, a user may install a software application on server computers owned by the user and configure each server to operate as one or more of a forwarder, an indexer, a search head, etc. This arrangement generally may be referred to as an “on-premises” solution. That is, the system 108 is installed and operates on computing devices directly controlled by the user of the system. Some users may prefer an on-premises solution because it may provide a greater level of control over the configuration of certain aspects of the system (e.g., security, privacy, standards, controls, etc.). However, other users may instead prefer an arrangement in which the user is not directly responsible for providing and managing the computing devices upon which various components of system 108 operate.

In one embodiment, to provide an alternative to an entirely on-premises environment for system 108, one or more of the components of a data intake and query system instead may be provided as a cloud-based service. In this context, a cloud-based service refers to a service hosted by one more computing resources that are accessible to end users over a network, for example, by using a web browser or other application on a client device to interface with the remote computing resources. For example, a service provider may provide a cloud-based data intake and query system by managing computing resources configured to implement various aspects of the system (e.g., forwarders, indexers, search heads, etc.) and by providing access to the system to end users via a network. Typically, a user may pay a subscription or other fee to use such a service. Each subscribing user of the cloud-based service may be provided with an account that enables the user to configure a customized cloud-based system based on the user's preferences.

FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of an example cloud-based data intake and query system. Similar to the system of FIG. 2, the networked computer system 300 includes input data sources 202 and forwarders 204. These input data sources and forwarders may be in a subscriber's private computing environment. Alternatively, they might be directly managed by the service provider as part of the cloud service. In the example system 300, one or more forwarders 204 and client devices 302 are coupled to a cloud-based data intake and query system 306 via one or more networks 304. Network 304 broadly represents one or more LANs, WANs, cellular networks, intranetworks, internetworks, etc., using any of wired, wireless, terrestrial microwave, satellite links, etc., and may include the public Internet, and is used by client devices 302 and forwarders 204 to access the system 306. Similar to the system of 38, each of the forwarders 204 may be configured to receive data from an input source and to forward the data to other components of the system 306 for further processing.

In some embodiments, a cloud-based data intake and query system 306 may comprise a plurality of system instances 308. In general, each system instance 308 may include one or more computing resources managed by a provider of the cloud-based system 306 made available to a particular subscriber. The computing resources comprising a system instance 308 may, for example, include one or more servers or other devices configured to implement one or more forwarders, indexers, search heads, and other components of a data intake and query system, similar to system 108. As indicated above, a subscriber may use a web browser or other application of a client device 302 to access a web portal or other interface that enables the subscriber to configure an instance 308.

Providing a data intake and query system as described in reference to system 108 as a cloud-based service presents a number of challenges. Each of the components of a system 108 (e.g., forwarders, indexers, and search heads) may at times refer to various configuration files stored locally at each component. These configuration files typically may involve some level of user configuration to accommodate particular types of data a user desires to analyze and to account for other user preferences. However, in a cloud-based service context, users typically may not have direct access to the underlying computing resources implementing the various system components (e.g., the computing resources comprising each system instance 308) and may desire to make such configurations indirectly, for example, using one or more web-based interfaces. Thus, the techniques and systems described herein for providing user interfaces that enable a user to configure source type definitions are applicable to both on-premises and cloud-based service contexts, or some combination thereof (e.g., a hybrid system where both an on-premises environment, such as SPLUNK® ENTERPRISE, and a cloud-based environment, such as SPLUNK CLOUD™, are centrally visible).

2.6. Searching Externally-Archived Data

FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of an example of a data intake and query system 108 that provides transparent search facilities for data systems that are external to the data intake and query system. Such facilities are available in the Splunk® Analytics for Hadoop® system provided by Splunk Inc. of San Francisco, Calif. Splunk® Analytics for Hadoop® represents an analytics platform that enables business and IT teams to rapidly explore, analyze, and visualize data in Hadoop® and NoSQL data stores.

The search head 210 of the data intake and query system receives search requests from one or more client devices 404 over network connections 420. As discussed above, the data intake and query system 108 may reside in an enterprise location, in the cloud, etc. FIG. 4 illustrates that multiple client devices 404 a, 404 b, . . . , 404 n may communicate with the data intake and query system 108. The client devices 404 may communicate with the data intake and query system using a variety of connections. For example, one client device in FIG. 4 is illustrated as communicating over an Internet (Web) protocol, another client device is illustrated as communicating via a command line interface, and another client device is illustrated as communicating via a software developer kit (SDK).

The search head 210 analyzes the received search request to identify request parameters. If a search request received from one of the client devices 404 references an index maintained by the data intake and query system, then the search head 210 connects to one or more indexers 206 of the data intake and query system for the index referenced in the request parameters. That is, if the request parameters of the search request reference an index, then the search head accesses the data in the index via the indexer. The data intake and query system 108 may include one or more indexers 206, depending on system access resources and requirements. As described further below, the indexers 206 retrieve data from their respective local data stores 208 as specified in the search request. The indexers and their respective data stores can comprise one or more storage devices and typically reside on the same system, though they may be connected via a local network connection. Indexers here, as elsewhere, may include functionality for processing multiple data types, such as events and metrics data types discussed in reference to Indexer 436 of FIG. 18.

If the request parameters of the received search request reference an external data collection, which is not accessible to the indexers 206 of FIG. 4 or under the management of the data intake and query system, then the search head 210 can access the external data collection through an External Result Provider (ERP) process 410. An external data collection may be referred to as a “virtual index” (plural, “virtual indices”). An ERP process provides an interface through which the search head 210 may access virtual indices.

Thus, a search reference to an index of the system relates to a locally stored and managed data collection. In contrast, a search reference to a virtual index relates to an externally stored and managed data collection, which the search head may access through one or more ERP processes 410, 412. FIG. 4 shows two ERP processes 410, 412 that connect to respective remote (external) virtual indices, which are indicated as a Hadoop or another system 414 (e.g., Amazon S3, Amazon EMR, other Hadoop® Compatible File Systems (HCFS), etc.) and a relational database management system (RDBMS) 416. Other virtual indices may include other file organizations and protocols, such as Structured Query Language (SQL) and the like. The ellipses between the ERP processes 410, 412 indicate optional additional ERP processes of the data intake and query system 108. An ERP process may be a computer process that is initiated or spawned by the search head 210 and is executed by the search data intake and query system 108. Alternatively or additionally, an ERP process may be a process spawned by the search head 210 on the same or different host system as the search head 210 resides.

The search head 210 may spawn a single ERP process in response to multiple virtual indices referenced in a search request, or the search head may spawn different ERP processes for different virtual indices. Generally, virtual indices that share common data configurations or protocols may share ERP processes. For example, all search query references to a Hadoop file system may be processed by the same ERP process, if the ERP process is suitably configured. Likewise, all search query references to a SQL database may be processed by the same ERP process. In addition, the search head may provide a common ERP process for common external data source types (e.g., a common vendor may utilize a common ERP process, even if the vendor includes different data storage system types, such as Hadoop and SQL). Common indexing schemes also may be handled by common ERP processes, such as flat text files or Weblog files.

The search head 210 determines the number of ERP processes to be initiated via the use of configuration parameters that are included in a search request message. Generally, there is a one-to-many relationship between an external results provider “family” and ERP processes. There is also a one-to-many relationship between an ERP process and corresponding virtual indices that are referred to in a search request. For example, using RDBMS, assume two independent instances of such a system by one vendor, such as one RDBMS for production and another RDBMS used for development. In such a situation, it is likely preferable (but optional) to use two ERP processes to maintain the independent operation as between production and development data. Both of the ERPs, however, will belong to the same family, because the two RDBMS system types are from the same vendor.

The ERP processes 410, 412 receive a search request from the search head 210. The search head may optimize the received search request for execution at the respective external virtual index. Alternatively, the ERP process may receive a search request as a result of analysis performed by the search head or by a different system process. The ERP processes 410, 412 can communicate with the search head 210 via conventional input/output routines (e.g., standard in/standard out, etc.). In this way, the ERP process receives the search request from a client device such that the search request may be efficiently executed at the corresponding external virtual index.

The ERP processes 410, 412 may be implemented as a process of the data intake and query system. Each ERP process may be provided by the data intake and query system, or may be provided by process or application providers who are independent of the data intake and query system. Each respective ERP process may include an interface application installed at a computer of the external result provider that ensures proper communication between the search support system and the external result provider. The ERP processes 410, 412 generate appropriate search requests in the protocol and syntax of the respective virtual indices 414, 416, each of which corresponds to the search request received by the search head 210. Upon receiving search results from their corresponding virtual indices, the respective ERP process passes the result to the search head 210, which may return or display the results or a processed set of results based on the returned results to the respective client device.

Client devices 404 may communicate with the data intake and query system 108 through a network interface 420, e.g., one or more LANs, WANs, cellular networks, intranetworks, and/or internetworks using any of wired, wireless, terrestrial microwave, satellite links, etc., and may include the public Internet.

The analytics platform utilizing the External Result Provider process described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 8,738,629, entitled “EXTERNAL RESULT PROVIDED PROCESS FOR RETRIEVING DATA STORED USING A DIFFERENT CONFIGURATION OR PROTOCOL”, issued on 27 May 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 8,738,587, entitled “PROCESSING A SYSTEM SEARCH REQUEST BY RETRIEVING RESULTS FROM BOTH A NATIVE INDEX AND A VIRTUAL INDEX”, issued on 25 Jul. 2013, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/266,832, entitled “PROCESSING A SYSTEM SEARCH REQUEST ACROSS DISPARATE DATA COLLECTION SYSTEMS”, filed on 1 May 2014, and U.S. Pat. No. 9,514,189, entitled “PROCESSING A SYSTEM SEARCH REQUEST INCLUDING EXTERNAL DATA SOURCES”, issued on 6 Dec. 2016, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

2.6.1. ERP Process Features

The ERP processes described above may include two operation modes: a streaming mode and a reporting mode. The ERP processes can operate in streaming mode only, in reporting mode only, or in both modes simultaneously. Operating in both modes simultaneously is referred to as mixed mode operation. In a mixed mode operation, the ERP at some point can stop providing the search head with streaming results and only provide reporting results thereafter, or the search head at some point may start ignoring streaming results it has been using and only use reporting results thereafter.

The streaming mode returns search results in real time, with minimal processing, in response to the search request. The reporting mode provides results of a search request with processing of the search results prior to providing them to the requesting search head, which in turn provides results to the requesting client device. ERP operation with such multiple modes provides greater performance flexibility with regard to report time, search latency, and resource utilization.

In a mixed mode operation, both streaming mode and reporting mode are operating simultaneously. The streaming mode results (e.g., the machine data obtained from the external data source) are provided to the search head, which can then process the results data (e.g., break the machine data into events, timestamp it, filter it, etc.) and integrate the results data with the results data from other external data sources, and/or from data stores of the search head. The search head performs such processing and can immediately start returning interim (streaming mode) results to the user at the requesting client device; simultaneously, the search head is waiting for the ERP process to process the data it is retrieving from the external data source as a result of the concurrently executing reporting mode.

In some instances, the ERP process initially operates in a mixed mode, such that the streaming mode operates to enable the ERP quickly to return interim results (e.g., some of the machined data or unprocessed data necessary to respond to a search request) to the search head, enabling the search head to process the interim results and begin providing to the client or search requester interim results that are responsive to the query. Meanwhile, in this mixed mode, the ERP also operates concurrently in reporting mode, processing portions of machine data in a manner responsive to the search query. Upon determining that it has results from the reporting mode available to return to the search head, the ERP may halt processing in the mixed mode at that time (or some later time) by stopping the return of data in streaming mode to the search head and switching to reporting mode only. The ERP at this point starts sending interim results in reporting mode to the search head, which in turn may then present this processed data responsive to the search request to the client or search requester. Typically the search head switches from using results from the ERP's streaming mode of operation to results from the ERP's reporting mode of operation when the higher bandwidth results from the reporting mode outstrip the amount of data processed by the search head in the streaming mode of ERP operation.

A reporting mode may have a higher bandwidth because the ERP does not have to spend time transferring data to the search head for processing all the machine data. In addition, the ERP may optionally direct another processor to do the processing.

The streaming mode of operation does not need to be stopped to gain the higher bandwidth benefits of a reporting mode; the search head could simply stop using the streaming mode results—and start using the reporting mode results—when the bandwidth of the reporting mode has caught up with or exceeded the amount of bandwidth provided by the streaming mode. Thus, a variety of triggers and ways to accomplish a search head's switch from using streaming mode results to using reporting mode results may be appreciated by one skilled in the art.

The reporting mode can involve the ERP process (or an external system) performing event breaking, time stamping, filtering of events to match the search query request, and calculating statistics on the results. The user can request particular types of data, such as if the search query itself involves types of events, or the search request may ask for statistics on data, such as on events that meet the search request. In either case, the search head understands the query language used in the received query request, which may be a proprietary language. One exemplary query language is Splunk Processing Language (SPL) developed by the assignee of the application, Splunk Inc. The search head typically understands how to use that language to obtain data from the indexers, which store data in a format used by the SPLUNK® Enterprise system.

The ERP processes support the search head, as the search head is not ordinarily configured to understand the format in which data is stored in external data sources such as Hadoop or SQL data systems. Rather, the ERP process performs that translation from the query submitted in the search support system's native format (e.g., SPL if SPLUNK® ENTERPRISE is used as the search support system) to a search query request format that will be accepted by the corresponding external data system. The external data system typically stores data in a different format from that of the search support system's native index format, and it utilizes a different query language (e.g., SQL or MapReduce, rather than SPL or the like).

As noted, the ERP process can operate in the streaming mode alone. After the ERP process has performed the translation of the query request and received raw results from the streaming mode, the search head can integrate the returned data with any data obtained from local data sources (e.g., native to the search support system), other external data sources, and other ERP processes (if such operations were required to satisfy the terms of the search query). An advantage of mixed mode operation is that, in addition to streaming mode, the ERP process is also executing concurrently in reporting mode. Thus, the ERP process (rather than the search head) is processing query results (e.g., performing event breaking, timestamping, filtering, possibly calculating statistics if required to be responsive to the search query request, etc.). It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that additional time is needed for the ERP process to perform the processing in such a configuration. Therefore, the streaming mode will allow the search head to start returning interim results to the user at the client device before the ERP process can complete sufficient processing to start returning any search results. The switchover between streaming and reporting mode happens when the ERP process determines that the switchover is appropriate, such as when the ERP process determines it can begin returning meaningful results from its reporting mode.

The operation described above illustrates the source of operational latency: streaming mode has low latency (immediate results) and usually has relatively low bandwidth (fewer results can be returned per unit of time). In contrast, the concurrently running reporting mode has relatively high latency (it has to perform a lot more processing before returning any results) and usually has relatively high bandwidth (more results can be processed per unit of time). For example, when the ERP process does begin returning report results, it returns more processed results than in the streaming mode, because, e.g., statistics only need to be calculated to be responsive to the search request. That is, the ERP process doesn't have to take time to first return machine data to the search head. As noted, the ERP process could be configured to operate in streaming mode alone and return just the machine data for the search head to process in a way that is responsive to the search request. Alternatively, the ERP process can be configured to operate in the reporting mode only. Also, the ERP process can be configured to operate in streaming mode and reporting mode concurrently, as described, with the ERP process stopping the transmission of streaming results to the search head when the concurrently running reporting mode has caught up and started providing results. The reporting mode does not require the processing of all machine data that is responsive to the search query request before the ERP process starts returning results; rather, the reporting mode usually performs processing of chunks of events and returns the processing results to the search head for each chunk.

For example, an ERP process can be configured to merely return the contents of a search result file verbatim, with little or no processing of results. That way, the search head performs all processing (such as parsing byte streams into events, filtering, etc.). The ERP process can be configured to perform additional intelligence, such as analyzing the search request and handling all the computation that a native search indexer process would otherwise perform. In this way, the configured ERP process provides greater flexibility in features while operating according to desired preferences, such as response latency and resource requirements.

2.7. Data Ingestion

FIG. 5A is a flow chart of an example method that illustrates how indexers process, index, and store data received from forwarders, in accordance with example embodiments. The data flow illustrated in FIG. 5A is provided for illustrative purposes only; those skilled in the art would understand that one or more of the steps of the processes illustrated in FIG. 5A may be removed or that the ordering of the steps may be changed. Furthermore, for the purposes of illustrating a clear example, one or more particular system components are described in the context of performing various operations during each of the data flow stages. For example, a forwarder is described as receiving and processing machine data during an input phase; an indexer is described as parsing and indexing machine data during parsing and indexing phases; and a search head is described as performing a search query during a search phase. However, other system arrangements and distributions of the processing steps across system components may be used.

2.7.1. Input

At block 502, a forwarder receives data from an input source, such as a data source 202 shown in FIG. 2. A forwarder initially may receive the data as a raw data stream generated by the input source. For example, a forwarder may receive a data stream from a log file generated by an application server, from a stream of network data from a network device, or from any other source of data. In some embodiments, a forwarder receives the raw data and may segment the data stream into “blocks”, possibly of a uniform data size, to facilitate subsequent processing steps.

At block 504, a forwarder or other system component annotates each block generated from the raw data with one or more metadata fields. These metadata fields may, for example, provide information related to the data block as a whole and may apply to each event that is subsequently derived from the data in the data block. For example, the metadata fields may include separate fields specifying each of a host, a source, and a source type related to the data block. A host field may contain a value identifying a host name or IP address of a device that generated the data. A source field may contain a value identifying a source of the data, such as a pathname of a file or a protocol and port related to received network data. A source type field may contain a value specifying a particular source type label for the data. Additional metadata fields may also be included during the input phase, such as a character encoding of the data, if known, and possibly other values that provide information relevant to later processing steps. In some embodiments, a forwarder forwards the annotated data blocks to another system component (typically an indexer) for further processing.

The data intake and query system allows forwarding of data from one data intake and query instance to another, or even to a third-party system. The data intake and query system can employ different types of forwarders in a configuration.

In some embodiments, a forwarder may contain the essential components needed to forward data. A forwarder can gather data from a variety of inputs and forward the data to an indexer for indexing and searching. A forwarder can also tag metadata (e.g., source, source type, host, etc.).

In some embodiments, a forwarder has the capabilities of the aforementioned forwarder as well as additional capabilities. The forwarder can parse data before forwarding the data (e.g., can associate a time stamp with a portion of data and create an event, etc.) and can route data based on criteria such as source or type of event. The forwarder can also index data locally while forwarding the data to another indexer.

2.7.2. Parsing

At block 506, an indexer receives data blocks from a forwarder and parses the data to organize the data into events. In some embodiments, to organize the data into events, an indexer may determine a source type associated with each data block (e.g., by extracting a source type label from the metadata fields associated with the data block, etc.) and refer to a source type configuration corresponding to the identified source type. The source type definition may include one or more properties that indicate to the indexer to automatically determine the boundaries within the received data that indicate the portions of machine data for events. In general, these properties may include regular expression-based rules or delimiter rules where, for example, event boundaries may be indicated by predefined characters or character strings. These predefined characters may include punctuation marks or other special characters including, for example, carriage returns, tabs, spaces, line breaks, etc. If a source type for the data is unknown to the indexer, an indexer may infer a source type for the data by examining the structure of the data. Then, the indexer can apply an inferred source type definition to the data to create the events.

At block 508, the indexer determines a timestamp for each event. Similar to the process for parsing machine data, an indexer may again refer to a source type definition associated with the data to locate one or more properties that indicate instructions for determining a timestamp for each event. The properties may, for example, instruct an indexer to extract a time value from a portion of data for the event, to interpolate time values based on timestamps associated with temporally proximate events, to create a timestamp based on a time the portion of machine data was received or generated, to use the timestamp of a previous event, or use any other rules for determining timestamps.

At block 510, the indexer associates with each event one or more metadata fields including a field containing the timestamp determined for the event. In some embodiments, a timestamp may be included in the metadata fields. These metadata fields may include any number of “default fields” that are associated with all events, and may also include one more custom fields as defined by a user. Similar to the metadata fields associated with the data blocks at block 504, the default metadata fields associated with each event may include a host, source, and source type field including or in addition to a field storing the timestamp.

At block 512, an indexer may optionally apply one or more transformations to data included in the events created at block 506. For example, such transformations can include removing a portion of an event (e.g., a portion used to define event boundaries, extraneous characters from the event, other extraneous text, etc.), masking a portion of an event (e.g., masking a credit card number), removing redundant portions of an event, etc. The transformations applied to events may, for example, be specified in one or more configuration files and referenced by one or more source type definitions.

FIG. 5C illustrates an illustrative example of machine data can be stored in a data store in accordance with various disclosed embodiments. In other embodiments, machine data can be stored in a flat file in a corresponding bucket with an associated index file, such as a time series index or “TSIDX.” As such, the depiction of machine data and associated metadata as rows and columns in the table of FIG. 5C is merely illustrative and is not intended to limit the data format in which the machine data and metadata is stored in various embodiments described herein. In one particular embodiment, machine data can be stored in a compressed or encrypted formatted. In such embodiments, the machine data can be stored with or be associated with data that describes the compression or encryption scheme with which the machine data is stored. The information about the compression or encryption scheme can be used to decompress or decrypt the machine data, and any metadata with which it is stored, at search time.

As mentioned above, certain metadata, e.g., host 536, source 537, source type 538 and timestamps 535 can be generated for each event, and associated with a corresponding portion of machine data 539 when storing the event data in a data store, e.g., data store 208. Any of the metadata can be extracted from the corresponding machine data, or supplied or defined by an entity, such as a user or computer system. The metadata fields can become part of or stored with the event. Note that while the time-stamp metadata field can be extracted from the raw data of each event, the values for the other metadata fields may be determined by the indexer based on information it receives pertaining to the source of the data separate from the machine data.

While certain default or user-defined metadata fields can be extracted from the machine data for indexing purposes, all the machine data within an event can be maintained in its original condition. As such, in embodiments in which the portion of machine data included in an event is unprocessed or otherwise unaltered, it is referred to herein as a portion of raw machine data. In other embodiments, the port of machine data in an event can be processed or otherwise altered. As such, unless certain information needs to be removed for some reasons (e.g. extraneous information, confidential information), all the raw machine data contained in an event can be preserved and saved in its original form. Accordingly, the data store in which the event records are stored is sometimes referred to as a “raw record data store.” The raw record data store contains a record of the raw event data tagged with the various default fields.

In FIG. 5C, the first three rows of the table represent events 531, 532, and 533 and are related to a server access log that records requests from multiple clients processed by a server, as indicated by entry of “access.log” in the source column 536.

In the example shown in FIG. 5C, each of the events 531-534 is associated with a discrete request made from a client device. The raw machine data generated by the server and extracted from a server access log can include the IP address of the client 540, the user id of the person requesting the document 541, the time the server finished processing the request 542, the request line from the client 543, the status code returned by the server to the client 545, the size of the object returned to the client (in this case, the gif file requested by the client) 546 and the time spent to serve the request in microseconds 544. As seen in FIG. 5C, all the raw machine data retrieved from the server access log is retained and stored as part of the corresponding events, 1221, 1222, and 1223 in the data store.

Event 534 is associated with an entry in a server error log, as indicated by “error.log” in the source column 537, that records errors that the server encountered when processing a client request. Similar to the events related to the server access log, all the raw machine data in the error log file pertaining to event 534 can be preserved and stored as part of the event 534.

Saving minimally processed or unprocessed machine data in a data store associated with metadata fields in the manner similar to that shown in FIG. 5C is advantageous because it allows search of all the machine data at search time instead of searching only previously specified and identified fields or field-value pairs. As mentioned above, because data structures used by various embodiments of the present disclosure maintain the underlying raw machine data and use a late-binding schema for searching the raw machines data, it enables a user to continue investigating and learn valuable insights about the raw data. In other words, the user is not compelled to know about all the fields of information that will be needed at data ingestion time. As a user learns more about the data in the events, the user can continue to refine the late-binding schema by defining new extraction rules, or modifying or deleting existing extraction rules used by the system.

2.7.3. Indexing

At blocks 514 and 516, an indexer can optionally generate a keyword index to facilitate fast keyword searching for events. To build a keyword index, at block 514, the indexer identifies a set of keywords in each event. At block 516, the indexer includes the identified keywords in an index, which associates each stored keyword with reference pointers to events containing that keyword (or to locations within events where that keyword is located, other location identifiers, etc.). When an indexer subsequently receives a keyword-based query, the indexer can access the keyword index to quickly identify events containing the keyword.

In some embodiments, the keyword index may include entries for field name-value pairs found in events, where a field name-value pair can include a pair of keywords connected by a symbol, such as an equals sign or colon. This way, events containing these field name-value pairs can be quickly located. In some embodiments, fields can automatically be generated for some or all of the field names of the field name-value pairs at the time of indexing. For example, if the string “dest=10.0.1.2” is found in an event, a field named “dest” may be created for the event, and assigned a value of “10.0.1.2”.

At block 518, the indexer stores the events with an associated timestamp in a data store 208. Timestamps enable a user to search for events based on a time range. In some embodiments, the stored events are organized into “buckets,” where each bucket stores events associated with a specific time range based on the timestamps associated with each event. This improves time-based searching, as well as allows for events with recent timestamps, which may have a higher likelihood of being accessed, to be stored in a faster memory to facilitate faster retrieval. For example, buckets containing the most recent events can be stored in flash memory rather than on a hard disk. In some embodiments, each bucket may be associated with an identifier, a time range, and a size constraint.

Each indexer 206 may be responsible for storing and searching a subset of the events contained in a corresponding data store 208. By distributing events among the indexers and data stores, the indexers can analyze events for a query in parallel. For example, using map-reduce techniques, each indexer returns partial responses for a subset of events to a search head that combines the results to produce an answer for the query. By storing events in buckets for specific time ranges, an indexer may further optimize the data retrieval process by searching buckets corresponding to time ranges that are relevant to a query.

In some embodiments, each indexer has a home directory and a cold directory. The home directory of an indexer stores hot buckets and warm buckets, and the cold directory of an indexer stores cold buckets. A hot bucket is a bucket that is capable of receiving and storing events. A warm bucket is a bucket that can no longer receive events for storage but has not yet been moved to the cold directory. A cold bucket is a bucket that can no longer receive events and may be a bucket that was previously stored in the home directory. The home directory may be stored in faster memory, such as flash memory, as events may be actively written to the home directory, and the home directory may typically store events that are more frequently searched and thus are accessed more frequently. The cold directory may be stored in slower and/or larger memory, such as a hard disk, as events are no longer being written to the cold directory, and the cold directory may typically store events that are not as frequently searched and thus are accessed less frequently. In some embodiments, an indexer may also have a quarantine bucket that contains events having potentially inaccurate information, such as an incorrect time stamp associated with the event or a time stamp that appears to be an unreasonable time stamp for the corresponding event. The quarantine bucket may have events from any time range; as such, the quarantine bucket may always be searched at search time. Additionally, an indexer may store old, archived data in a frozen bucket that is not capable of being searched at search time. In some embodiments, a frozen bucket may be stored in slower and/or larger memory, such as a hard disk, and may be stored in offline and/or remote storage.

Moreover, events and buckets can also be replicated across different indexers and data stores to facilitate high availability and disaster recovery as described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,130,971, entitled “SITE-BASED SEARCH AFFINITY”, issued on 8 Sep. 2015, and in U.S. patent Ser. No. 14/266,817, entitled “MULTI-SITE CLUSTERING”, issued on 1 Sep. 2015, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

FIG. 5B is a block diagram of an example data store 501 that includes a directory for each index (or partition) that contains a portion of data managed by an indexer. FIG. 5B further illustrates details of an embodiment of an inverted index 507B and an event reference array 515 associated with inverted index 507B.

The data store 501 can correspond to a data store 208 that stores events managed by an indexer 206 or can correspond to a different data store associated with an indexer 206. In the illustrated embodiment, the data store 501 includes a _main directory 503 associated with a _main index and a _test directory 505 associated with a _test index. However, the data store 501 can include fewer or more directories. In some embodiments, multiple indexes can share a single directory or all indexes can share a common directory. Additionally, although illustrated as a single data store 501, it will be understood that the data store 501 can be implemented as multiple data stores storing different portions of the information shown in FIG. 5B. For example, a single index or partition can span multiple directories or multiple data stores, and can be indexed or searched by multiple corresponding indexers.

In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 5B, the index-specific directories 503 and 505 include inverted indexes 507A, 507B and 509A, 509B, respectively. The inverted indexes 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B can be keyword indexes or field-value pair indexes described herein and can include less or more information that depicted in FIG. 5B.

In some embodiments, the inverted index 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B can correspond to a distinct time-series bucket that is managed by the indexer 206 and that contains events corresponding to the relevant index (e.g., _main index, _test index). As such, each inverted index can correspond to a particular range of time for an index. Additional files, such as high performance indexes for each time-series bucket of an index, can also be stored in the same directory as the inverted indexes 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B. In some embodiments inverted index 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B can correspond to multiple time-series buckets or inverted indexes 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B can correspond to a single time-series bucket.

Each inverted index 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B can include one or more entries, such as keyword (or token) entries or field-value pair entries. Furthermore, in certain embodiments, the inverted indexes 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B can include additional information, such as a time range 523 associated with the inverted index or an index identifier 525 identifying the index associated with the inverted index 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B. However, each inverted index 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B can include less or more information than depicted.

Token entries, such as token entries 511 illustrated in inverted index 507B, can include a token 511A (e.g., “error,” “itemID,” etc.) and event references 511B indicative of events that include the token. For example, for the token “error,” the corresponding token entry includes the token “error” and an event reference, or unique identifier, for each event stored in the corresponding time-series bucket that includes the token “error.” In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 5B, the error token entry includes the identifiers 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, and 12 corresponding to events managed by the indexer 206 and associated with the index _main 503 that are located in the time-series bucket associated with the inverted index 507B.

In some cases, some token entries can be default entries, automatically determined entries, or user specified entries. In some embodiments, the indexer 206 can identify each word or string in an event as a distinct token and generate a token entry for it. In some cases, the indexer 206 can identify the beginning and ending of tokens based on punctuation, spaces, as described in greater detail herein. In certain cases, the indexer 206 can rely on user input or a configuration file to identify tokens for token entries 511, etc. It will be understood that any combination of token entries can be included as a default, automatically determined, a or included based on user-specified criteria.

Similarly, field-value pair entries, such as field-value pair entries 513 shown in inverted index 507B, can include a field-value pair 513A and event references 513B indicative of events that include a field value that corresponds to the field-value pair. For example, for a field-value pair sourcetype::sendmail, a field-value pair entry would include the field-value pair sourcetype::sendmail and a unique identifier, or event reference, for each event stored in the corresponding time-series bucket that includes a sendmail sourcetype.

In some cases, the field-value pair entries 513 can be default entries, automatically determined entries, or user specified entries. As a non-limiting example, the field-value pair entries for the fields host, source, sourcetype can be included in the inverted indexes 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B as a default. As such, all of the inverted indexes 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B can include field-value pair entries for the fields host, source, sourcetype. As yet another non-limiting example, the field-value pair entries for the IP address field can be user specified and may only appear in the inverted index 507B based on user-specified criteria. As another non-limiting example, as the indexer indexes the events, it can automatically identify field-value pairs and create field-value pair entries. For example, based on the indexers review of events, it can identify IP_address as a field in each event and add the IP_address field-value pair entries to the inverted index 507B. It will be understood that any combination of field-value pair entries can be included as a default, automatically determined, or included based on user-specified criteria.

Each unique identifier 517, or event reference, can correspond to a unique event located in the time series bucket. However, the same event reference can be located in multiple entries. For example if an event has a sourcetype splunkd, host www1 and token “warning,” then the unique identifier for the event will appear in the field-value pair entries sourcetype::splunkd and host::www1, as well as the token entry “warning.” With reference to the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 5B and the event that corresponds to the event reference 3, the event reference 3 is found in the field-value pair entries 513 host::hostA, source::sourceB, sourcetype::sourcetypeA, and IP_address::91.205.189.15 indicating that the event corresponding to the event references is from hostA, sourceB, of sourcetypeA, and includes 91.205.189.15 in the event data.

For some fields, the unique identifier is located in only one field-value pair entry for a particular field. For example, the inverted index may include four sourcetype field-value pair entries corresponding to four different sourcetypes of the events stored in a bucket (e.g., sourcetypes: sendmail, splunkd, web_access, and web_service). Within those four sourcetype field-value pair entries, an identifier for a particular event may appear in only one of the field-value pair entries. With continued reference to the example illustrated embodiment of FIG. 5B, since the event reference 7 appears in the field-value pair entry sourcetype::sourcetypeA, then it does not appear in the other field-value pair entries for the sourcetype field, including sourcetype::sourcetypeB, sourcetype::sourcetypeC, and sourcetype::sourcetypeD.

The event references 517 can be used to locate the events in the corresponding bucket. For example, the inverted index can include, or be associated with, an event reference array 515. The event reference array 515 can include an array entry 517 for each event reference in the inverted index 507B. Each array entry 517 can include location information 519 of the event corresponding to the unique identifier (non-limiting example: seek address of the event), a timestamp 521 associated with the event, or additional information regarding the event associated with the event reference, etc.

For each token entry 511 or field-value pair entry 513, the event reference 501B or unique identifiers can be listed in chronological order or the value of the event reference can be assigned based on chronological data, such as a timestamp associated with the event referenced by the event reference. For example, the event reference 1 in the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 5B can correspond to the first-in-time event for the bucket, and the event reference 12 can correspond to the last-in-time event for the bucket. However, the event references can be listed in any order, such as reverse chronological order, ascending order, descending order, or some other order, etc. Further, the entries can be sorted. For example, the entries can be sorted alphabetically (collectively or within a particular group), by entry origin (e.g., default, automatically generated, user-specified, etc.), by entry type (e.g., field-value pair entry, token entry, etc.), or chronologically by when added to the inverted index, etc. In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 5B, the entries are sorted first by entry type and then alphabetically.

As a non-limiting example of how the inverted indexes 507A . . . 507B, and 509A . . . 509B can be used during a data categorization request command, the indexers can receive filter criteria indicating data that is to be categorized and categorization criteria indicating how the data is to be categorized. Example filter criteria can include, but is not limited to, indexes (or partitions), hosts, sources, sourcetypes, time ranges, field identifier, keywords, etc.

Using the filter criteria, the indexer identifies relevant inverted indexes to be searched. For example, if the filter criteria includes a set of partitions, the indexer can identify the inverted indexes stored in the directory corresponding to the particular partition as relevant inverted indexes. Other means can be used to identify inverted indexes associated with a partition of interest. For example, in some embodiments, the indexer can review an entry in the inverted indexes, such as an index-value pair entry 513 to determine if a particular inverted index is relevant. If the filter criteria does not identify any partition, then the indexer can identify all inverted indexes managed by the indexer as relevant inverted indexes.

Similarly, if the filter criteria includes a time range, the indexer can identify inverted indexes corresponding to buckets that satisfy at least a portion of the time range as relevant inverted indexes. For example, if the time range is last hour then the indexer can identify all inverted indexes that correspond to buckets storing events associated with timestamps within the last hour as relevant inverted indexes.

When used in combination, an index filter criterion specifying one or more partitions and a time range filter criterion specifying a particular time range can be used to identify a subset of inverted indexes within a particular directory (or otherwise associated with a particular partition) as relevant inverted indexes. As such, the indexer can focus the processing to only a subset of the total number of inverted indexes that the indexer manages.

Once the relevant inverted indexes are identified, the indexer can review them using any additional filter criteria to identify events that satisfy the filter criteria. In some cases, using the known location of the directory in which the relevant inverted indexes are located, the indexer can determine that any events identified using the relevant inverted indexes satisfy an index filter criterion. For example, if the filter criteria includes a partition main, then the indexer can determine that any events identified using inverted indexes within the partition main directory (or otherwise associated with the partition main) satisfy the index filter criterion.

Furthermore, based on the time range associated with each inverted index, the indexer can determine that that any events identified using a particular inverted index satisfies a time range filter criterion. For example, if a time range filter criterion is for the last hour and a particular inverted index corresponds to events within a time range of 50 minutes ago to 35 minutes ago, the indexer can determine that any events identified using the particular inverted index satisfy the time range filter criterion. Conversely, if the particular inverted index corresponds to events within a time range of 59 minutes ago to 62 minutes ago, the indexer can determine that some events identified using the particular inverted index may not satisfy the time range filter criterion.

Using the inverted indexes, the indexer can identify event references (and therefore events) that satisfy the filter criteria. For example, if the token “error” is a filter criterion, the indexer can track all event references within the token entry “error.” Similarly, the indexer can identify other event references located in other token entries or field-value pair entries that match the filter criteria. The system can identify event references located in all of the entries identified by the filter criteria. For example, if the filter criteria include the token “error” and field-value pair sourcetype::web_ui, the indexer can track the event references found in both the token entry “error” and the field-value pair entry sourcetype::web_ui. As mentioned previously, in some cases, such as when multiple values are identified for a particular filter criterion (e.g., multiple sources for a source filter criterion), the system can identify event references located in at least one of the entries corresponding to the multiple values and in all other entries identified by the filter criteria. The indexer can determine that the events associated with the identified event references satisfy the filter criteria.

In some cases, the indexer can further consult a timestamp associated with the event reference to determine whether an event satisfies the filter criteria. For example, if an inverted index corresponds to a time range that is partially outside of a time range filter criterion, then the indexer can consult a timestamp associated with the event reference to determine whether the corresponding event satisfies the time range criterion. In some embodiments, to identify events that satisfy a time range, the indexer can review an array, such as the event reference array 1614 that identifies the time associated with the events. Furthermore, as mentioned above using the known location of the directory in which the relevant inverted indexes are located (or other index identifier), the indexer can determine that any events identified using the relevant inverted indexes satisfy the index filter criterion.

In some cases, based on the filter criteria, the indexer reviews an extraction rule. In certain embodiments, if the filter criteria includes a field name that does not correspond to a field-value pair entry in an inverted index, the indexer can review an extraction rule, which may be located in a configuration file, to identify a field that corresponds to a field-value pair entry in the inverted index.

For example, the filter criteria includes a field name “sessionID” and the indexer determines that at least one relevant inverted index does not include a field-value pair entry corresponding to the field name sessionID, the indexer can review an extraction rule that identifies how the sessionID field is to be extracted from a particular host, source, or sourcetype (implicitly identifying the particular host, source, or sourcetype that includes a sessionID field). The indexer can replace the field name “sessionID” in the filter criteria with the identified host, source, or sourcetype. In some cases, the field name “sessionID” may be associated with multiples hosts, sources, or sourcetypes, in which case, all identified hosts, sources, and sourcetypes can be added as filter criteria. In some cases, the identified host, source, or sourcetype can replace or be appended to a filter criterion, or be excluded. For example, if the filter criteria includes a criterion for source S1 and the “sessionID” field is found in source S2, the source S2 can replace S1 in the filter criteria, be appended such that the filter criteria includes source S1 and source S2, or be excluded based on the presence of the filter criterion source S1. If the identified host, source, or sourcetype is included in the filter criteria, the indexer can then identify a field-value pair entry in the inverted index that includes a field value corresponding to the identity of the particular host, source, or sourcetype identified using the extraction rule.

Once the events that satisfy the filter criteria are identified, the system, such as the indexer 206 can categorize the results based on the categorization criteria. The categorization criteria can include categories for grouping the results, such as any combination of partition, source, sourcetype, or host, or other categories or fields as desired.

The indexer can use the categorization criteria to identify categorization criteria-value pairs or categorization criteria values by which to categorize or group the results. The categorization criteria-value pairs can correspond to one or more field-value pair entries stored in a relevant inverted index, one or more index-value pairs based on a directory in which the inverted index is located or an entry in the inverted index (or other means by which an inverted index can be associated with a partition), or other criteria-value pair that identifies a general category and a particular value for that category. The categorization criteria values can correspond to the value portion of the categorization criteria-value pair.

As mentioned, in some cases, the categorization criteria-value pairs can correspond to one or more field-value pair entries stored in the relevant inverted indexes. For example, the categorization criteria-value pairs can correspond to field-value pair entries of host, source, and sourcetype (or other field-value pair entry as desired). For instance, if there are ten different hosts, four different sources, and five different sourcetypes for an inverted index, then the inverted index can include ten host field-value pair entries, four source field-value pair entries, and five sourcetype field-value pair entries. The indexer can use the nineteen distinct field-value pair entries as categorization criteria-value pairs to group the results.

Specifically, the indexer can identify the location of the event references associated with the events that satisfy the filter criteria within the field-value pairs, and group the event references based on their location. As such, the indexer can identify the particular field value associated with the event corresponding to the event reference. For example, if the categorization criteria include host and sourcetype, the host field-value pair entries and sourcetype field-value pair entries can be used as categorization criteria-value pairs to identify the specific host and sourcetype associated with the events that satisfy the filter criteria.

In addition, as mentioned, categorization criteria-value pairs can correspond to data other than the field-value pair entries in the relevant inverted indexes. For example, if partition or index is used as a categorization criterion, the inverted indexes may not include partition field-value pair entries. Rather, the indexer can identify the categorization criteria-value pair associated with the partition based on the directory in which an inverted index is located, information in the inverted index, or other information that associates the inverted index with the partition, etc. As such a variety of methods can be used to identify the categorization criteria-value pairs from the categorization criteria.

Accordingly based on the categorization criteria (and categorization criteria-value pairs), the indexer can generate groupings based on the events that satisfy the filter criteria. As a non-limiting example, if the categorization criteria includes a partition and sourcetype, then the groupings can correspond to events that are associated with each unique combination of partition and sourcetype. For instance, if there are three different partitions and two different sourcetypes associated with the identified events, then the six different groups can be formed, each with a unique partition value-sourcetype value combination. Similarly, if the categorization criteria includes partition, sourcetype, and host and there are two different partitions, three sourcetypes, and five hosts associated with the identified events, then the indexer can generate up to thirty groups for the results that satisfy the filter criteria. Each group can be associated with a unique combination of categorization criteria-value pairs (e.g., unique combinations of partition value sourcetype value, and host value).

In addition, the indexer can count the number of events associated with each group based on the number of events that meet the unique combination of categorization criteria for a particular group (or match the categorization criteria-value pairs for the particular group). With continued reference to the example above, the indexer can count the number of events that meet the unique combination of partition, sourcetype, and host for a particular group.

Each indexer communicates the groupings to the search head. The search head can aggregate the groupings from the indexers and provide the groupings for display. In some cases, the groups are displayed based on at least one of the host, source, sourcetype, or partition associated with the groupings. In some embodiments, the search head can further display the groups based on display criteria, such as a display order or a sort order as described in greater detail above.

As a non-limiting example and with reference to FIG. 5B, consider a request received by an indexer 206 that includes the following filter criteria: keyword=error, partition=main, time range=3/1/17 16:22.00.000-16:28.00.000, sourcetype=sourcetypeC, host=hostB, and the following categorization criteria: source.

Based on the above criteria, the indexer 206 identifies _main directory 503 and can ignore _test directory 505 and any other partition-specific directories. The indexer determines that inverted partition 507B is a relevant partition based on its location within the _main directory 503 and the time range associated with it. For sake of simplicity in this example, the indexer 206 determines that no other inverted indexes in the _main directory 503, such as inverted index 507A satisfy the time range criterion.

Having identified the relevant inverted index 507B, the indexer reviews the token entries 511 and the field-value pair entries 513 to identify event references, or events, that satisfy all of the filter criteria.

With respect to the token entries 511, the indexer can review the error token entry and identify event references 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, indicating that the term “error” is found in the corresponding events. Similarly, the indexer can identify event references 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 in the field-value pair entry sourcetype::sourcetypeC and event references 2, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11 in the field-value pair entry host::hostB. As the filter criteria did not include a source or an IP_address field-value pair, the indexer can ignore those field-value pair entries.

In addition to identifying event references found in at least one token entry or field-value pair entry (e.g., event references 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12), the indexer can identify events (and corresponding event references) that satisfy the time range criterion using the event reference array 1614 (e.g., event references 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Using the information obtained from the inverted index 507B (including the event reference array 515), the indexer 206 can identify the event references that satisfy all of the filter criteria (e.g., event references 5, 6, 8).

Having identified the events (and event references) that satisfy all of the filter criteria, the indexer 206 can group the event references using the received categorization criteria (source). In doing so, the indexer can determine that event references 5 and 6 are located in the field-value pair entry source::sourceD (or have matching categorization criteria-value pairs) and event reference 8 is located in the field-value pair entry source::sourceC. Accordingly, the indexer can generate a sourceC group having a count of one corresponding to reference 8 and a sourceD group having a count of two corresponding to references 5 and 6. This information can be communicated to the search head. In turn the search head can aggregate the results from the various indexers and display the groupings. As mentioned above, in some embodiments, the groupings can be displayed based at least in part on the categorization criteria, including at least one of host, source, sourcetype, or partition.

It will be understood that a change to any of the filter criteria or categorization criteria can result in different groupings. As a one non-limiting example, a request received by an indexer 206 that includes the following filter criteria: partition=_main, time range=3/1/17 3/1/17 16:21:20.000-16:28:17.000, and the following categorization criteria: host, source, sourcetype would result in the indexer identifying event references 1-12 as satisfying the filter criteria. The indexer would then generate up to 24 groupings corresponding to the 24 different combinations of the categorization criteria-value pairs, including host (hostA, hostB), source (sourceA, sourceB, sourceC, sourceD), and sourcetype (sourcetypeA, sourcetypeB, sourcetypeC). However, as there are only twelve events identifiers in the illustrated embodiment and some fall into the same grouping, the indexer generates eight groups and counts as follows:

Group 1 (hostA, sourceA, sourcetypeA): 1 (event reference 7)

Group 2 (hostA, sourceA, sourcetypeB): 2 (event references 1, 12)

Group 3 (hostA, sourceA, sourcetypeC): 1 (event reference 4)

Group 4 (hostA, sourceB, sourcetypeA): 1 (event reference 3)

Group 5 (hostA, sourceB, sourcetypeC): 1 (event reference 9)

Group 6 (hostB, sourceC, sourcetypeA): 1 (event reference 2)

Group 7 (hostB, sourceC, sourcetypeC): 2 (event references 8, 11)

Group 8 (hostB, sourceD, sourcetypeC): 3 (event references 5, 6, 10)

As noted, each group has a unique combination of categorization criteria-value pairs or categorization criteria values. The indexer communicates the groups to the search head for aggregation with results received from other indexers. In communicating the groups to the search head, the indexer can include the categorization criteria-value pairs for each group and the count. In some embodiments, the indexer can include more or less information. For example, the indexer can include the event references associated with each group and other identifying information, such as the indexer or inverted index used to identify the groups.

As another non-limiting examples, a request received by an indexer 206 that includes the following filter criteria: partition=_main, time range=3/1/17 3/1/17 16:21:20.000-16:28:17.000, source=sourceA, sourceD, and keyword=itemID and the following categorization criteria: host, source, sourcetype would result in the indexer identifying event references 4, 7, and 10 as satisfying the filter criteria, and generate the following groups:

Group 1 (hostA, sourceA, sourcetypeC): 1 (event reference 4)

Group 2 (hostA, sourceA, sourcetypeA): 1 (event reference 7)

Group 3 (hostB, sourceD, sourcetypeC): 1 (event references 10)

The indexer communicates the groups to the search head for aggregation with results received from other indexers. As will be understand there are myriad ways for filtering and categorizing the events and event references. For example, the indexer can review multiple inverted indexes associated with an partition or review the inverted indexes of multiple partitions, and categorize the data using any one or any combination of partition, host, source, sourcetype, or other category, as desired.

Further, if a user interacts with a particular group, the indexer can provide additional information regarding the group. For example, the indexer can perform a targeted search or sampling of the events that satisfy the filter criteria and the categorization criteria for the selected group, also referred to as the filter criteria corresponding to the group or filter criteria associated with the group.

In some cases, to provide the additional information, the indexer relies on the inverted index. For example, the indexer can identify the event references associated with the events that satisfy the filter criteria and the categorization criteria for the selected group and then use the event reference array 515 to access some or all of the identified events. In some cases, the categorization criteria values or categorization criteria-value pairs associated with the group become part of the filter criteria for the review.

With reference to FIG. 5B for instance, suppose a group is displayed with a count of six corresponding to event references 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11 (i.e., event references 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11 satisfy the filter criteria and are associated with matching categorization criteria values or categorization criteria-value pairs) and a user interacts with the group (e.g., selecting the group, clicking on the group, etc.). In response, the search head communicates with the indexer to provide additional information regarding the group.

In some embodiments, the indexer identifies the event references associated with the group using the filter criteria and the categorization criteria for the group (e.g., categorization criteria values or categorization criteria-value pairs unique to the group). Together, the filter criteria and the categorization criteria for the group can be referred to as the filter criteria associated with the group. Using the filter criteria associated with the group, the indexer identifies event references 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11.

Based on a sampling criteria, discussed in greater detail above, the indexer can determine that it will analyze a sample of the events associated with the event references 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11. For example, the sample can include analyzing event data associated with the event references 5, 8, 10. In some embodiments, the indexer can use the event reference array 1616 to access the event data associated with the event references 5, 8, 10. Once accessed, the indexer can compile the relevant information and provide it to the search head for aggregation with results from other indexers. By identifying events and sampling event data using the inverted indexes, the indexer can reduce the amount of actual data this is analyzed and the number of events that are accessed in order to generate the summary of the group and provide a response in less time.

2.8. Query Processing

FIG. 6A is a flow diagram of an example method that illustrates how a search head and indexers perform a search query, in accordance with example embodiments. At block 602, a search head receives a search query from a client. At block 604, the search head analyzes the search query to determine what portion(s) of the query can be delegated to indexers and what portions of the query can be executed locally by the search head. At block 606, the search head distributes the determined portions of the query to the appropriate indexers. In some embodiments, a search head cluster may take the place of an independent search head where each search head in the search head cluster coordinates with peer search heads in the search head cluster to schedule jobs, replicate search results, update configurations, fulfill search requests, etc. In some embodiments, the search head (or each search head) communicates with a master node (also known as a cluster master, not shown in FIG. 2) that provides the search head with a list of indexers to which the search head can distribute the determined portions of the query. The master node maintains a list of active indexers and can also designate which indexers may have responsibility for responding to queries over certain sets of events. A search head may communicate with the master node before the search head distributes queries to indexers to discover the addresses of active indexers.

At block 608, the indexers to which the query was distributed, search data stores associated with them for events that are responsive to the query. To determine which events are responsive to the query, the indexer searches for events that match the criteria specified in the query. These criteria can include matching keywords or specific values for certain fields. The searching operations at block 608 may use the late-binding schema to extract values for specified fields from events at the time the query is processed. In some embodiments, one or more rules for extracting field values may be specified as part of a source type definition in a configuration file. The indexers may then either send the relevant events back to the search head, or use the events to determine a partial result, and send the partial result back to the search head.

At block 610, the search head combines the partial results and/or events received from the indexers to produce a final result for the query. In some examples, the results of the query are indicative of performance or security of the IT environment and may help improve the performance of components in the IT environment. This final result may comprise different types of data depending on what the query requested. For example, the results can include a listing of matching events returned by the query, or some type of visualization of the data from the returned events. In another example, the final result can include one or more calculated values derived from the matching events.

The results generated by the system 108 can be returned to a client using different techniques. For example, one technique streams results or relevant events back to a client in real-time as they are identified. Another technique waits to report the results to the client until a complete set of results (which may include a set of relevant events or a result based on relevant events) is ready to return to the client. Yet another technique streams interim results or relevant events back to the client in real-time until a complete set of results is ready, and then returns the complete set of results to the client. In another technique, certain results are stored as “search jobs” and the client may retrieve the results by referring the search jobs.

The search head can also perform various operations to make the search more efficient. For example, before the search head begins execution of a query, the search head can determine a time range for the query and a set of common keywords that all matching events include. The search head may then use these parameters to query the indexers to obtain a superset of the eventual results. Then, during a filtering stage, the search head can perform field-extraction operations on the superset to produce a reduced set of search results. This speeds up queries, which may be particularly helpful for queries that are performed on a periodic basis.

2.9. Pipelined Search Language

Various embodiments of the present disclosure can be implemented using, or in conjunction with, a pipelined command language. A pipelined command language is a language in which a set of inputs or data is operated on by a first command in a sequence of commands, and then subsequent commands in the order they are arranged in the sequence. Such commands can include any type of functionality for operating on data, such as retrieving, searching, filtering, aggregating, processing, transmitting, and the like. As described herein, a query can thus be formulated in a pipelined command language and include any number of ordered or unordered commands for operating on data.

Splunk Processing Language (SPL) is an example of a pipelined command language in which a set of inputs or data is operated on by any number of commands in a particular sequence. A sequence of commands, or command sequence, can be formulated such that the order in which the commands are arranged defines the order in which the commands are applied to a set of data or the results of an earlier executed command. For example, a first command in a command sequence can operate to search or filter for specific data in particular set of data. The results of the first command can then be passed to another command listed later in the command sequence for further processing.

In various embodiments, a query can be formulated as a command sequence defined in a command line of a search UI. In some embodiments, a query can be formulated as a sequence of SPL commands. Some or all of the SPL commands in the sequence of SPL commands can be separated from one another by a pipe symbol “|”. In such embodiments, a set of data, such as a set of events, can be operated on by a first SPL command in the sequence, and then a subsequent SPL command following a pipe symbol “|” after the first SPL command operates on the results produced by the first SPL command or other set of data, and so on for any additional SPL commands in the sequence. As such, a query formulated using SPL comprises a series of consecutive commands that are delimited by pipe “|” characters. The pipe character indicates to the system that the output or result of one command (to the left of the pipe) should be used as the input for one of the subsequent commands (to the right of the pipe). This enables formulation of queries defined by a pipeline of sequenced commands that refines or enhances the data at each step along the pipeline until the desired results are attained. Accordingly, various embodiments described herein can be implemented with Splunk Processing Language (SPL) used in conjunction with the SPLUNK® ENTERPRISE system.

While a query can be formulated in many ways, a query can start with a search command and one or more corresponding search terms at the beginning of the pipeline. Such search terms can include any combination of keywords, phrases, times, dates, Boolean expressions, fieldname-field value pairs, etc. that specify which results should be obtained from an index. The results can then be passed as inputs into subsequent commands in a sequence of commands by using, for example, a pipe character. The subsequent commands in a sequence can include directives for additional processing of the results once it has been obtained from one or more indexes. For example, commands may be used to filter unwanted information out of the results, extract more information, evaluate field values, calculate statistics, reorder the results, create an alert, create summary of the results, or perform some type of aggregation function. In some embodiments, the summary can include a graph, chart, metric, or other visualization of the data. An aggregation function can include analysis or calculations to return an aggregate value, such as an average value, a sum, a maximum value, a root mean square, statistical values, and the like.

Due to its flexible nature, use of a pipelined command language in various embodiments is advantageous because it can perform “filtering” as well as “processing” functions. In other words, a single query can include a search command and search term expressions, as well as data-analysis expressions. For example, a command at the beginning of a query can perform a “filtering” step by retrieving a set of data based on a condition (e.g., records associated with server response times of less than 1 microsecond). The results of the filtering step can then be passed to a subsequent command in the pipeline that performs a “processing” step (e.g. calculation of an aggregate value related to the filtered events such as the average response time of servers with response times of less than 1 microsecond). Furthermore, the search command can allow events to be filtered by keyword as well as field value criteria. For example, a search command can filter out all events containing the word “warning” or filter out all events where a field value associated with a field “clientip” is “10.0.1.2.”

The results obtained or generated in response to a command in a query can be considered a set of results data. The set of results data can be passed from one command to another in any data format. In one embodiment, the set of result data can be in the form of a dynamically created table. Each command in a particular query can redefine the shape of the table. In some implementations, an event retrieved from an index in response to a query can be considered a row with a column for each field value. Columns contain basic information about the data and also may contain data that has been dynamically extracted at search time.

FIG. 6B provides a visual representation of the manner in which a pipelined command language or query operates in accordance with the disclosed embodiments. The query 630 can be inputted by the user into a search. The query comprises a search, the results of which are piped to two commands (namely, command 1 and command 2) that follow the search step.

Disk 622 represents the event data in the raw record data store.

When a user query is processed, a search step will precede other queries in the pipeline in order to generate a set of events at block 640. For example, the query can comprise search terms “sourcetype=syslog ERROR” at the front of the pipeline as shown in FIG. 6B. Intermediate results table 624 shows fewer rows because it represents the subset of events retrieved from the index that matched the search terms “sourcetype=syslog ERROR” from search command 630. By way of further example, instead of a search step, the set of events at the head of the pipeline may be generating by a call to a pre-existing inverted index (as will be explained later).

At block 642, the set of events generated in the first part of the query may be piped to a query that searches the set of events for field-value pairs or for keywords. For example, the second intermediate results table 626 shows fewer columns, representing the result of the top command, “top user” which summarizes the events into a list of the top 10 users and displays the user, count, and percentage.

Finally, at block 644, the results of the prior stage can be pipelined to another stage where further filtering or processing of the data can be performed, e.g., preparing the data for display purposes, filtering the data based on a condition, performing a mathematical calculation with the data, etc. As shown in FIG. 6B, the “fields—percent” part of command 630 removes the column that shows the percentage, thereby, leaving a final results table 628 without a percentage column. In different embodiments, other query languages, such as the Structured Query Language (“SQL”), can be used to create a query.

2.10. Field Extraction

The search head 210 allows users to search and visualize events generated from machine data received from homogenous data sources. The search head 210 also allows users to search and visualize events generated from machine data received from heterogeneous data sources. The search head 210 includes various mechanisms, which may additionally reside in an indexer 206, for processing a query. A query language may be used to create a query, such as any suitable pipelined query language. For example, Splunk Processing Language (SPL) can be utilized to make a query. SPL is a pipelined search language in which a set of inputs is operated on by a first command in a command line, and then a subsequent command following the pipe symbol “|” operates on the results produced by the first command, and so on for additional commands. Other query languages, such as the Structured Query Language (“SQL”), can be used to create a query.

In response to receiving the search query, search head 210 uses extraction rules to extract values for fields in the events being searched. The search head 210 obtains extraction rules that specify how to extract a value for fields from an event. Extraction rules can comprise regex rules that specify how to extract values for the fields corresponding to the extraction rules. In addition to specifying how to extract field values, the extraction rules may also include instructions for deriving a field value by performing a function on a character string or value retrieved by the extraction rule. For example, an extraction rule may truncate a character string or convert the character string into a different data format. In some cases, the query itself can specify one or more extraction rules.

The search head 210 can apply the extraction rules to events that it receives from indexers 206. Indexers 206 may apply the extraction rules to events in an associated data store 208. Extraction rules can be applied to all the events in a data store or to a subset of the events that have been filtered based on some criteria (e.g., event time stamp values, etc.). Extraction rules can be used to extract one or more values for a field from events by parsing the portions of machine data in the events and examining the data for one or more patterns of characters, numbers, delimiters, etc., that indicate where the field begins and, optionally, ends.

FIG. 7A is a diagram of an example scenario where a common customer identifier is found among log data received from three disparate data sources, in accordance with example embodiments. In this example, a user submits an order for merchandise using a vendor's shopping application program 701 running on the user's system. In this example, the order was not delivered to the vendor's server due to a resource exception at the destination server that is detected by the middleware code 702. The user then sends a message to the customer support server 703 to complain about the order failing to complete. The three systems 701, 702, and 703 are disparate systems that do not have a common logging format. The order application 701 sends log data 704 to the data intake and query system in one format, the middleware code 702 sends error log data 705 in a second format, and the support server 703 sends log data 706 in a third format.

Using the log data received at one or more indexers 206 from the three systems, the vendor can uniquely obtain an insight into user activity, user experience, and system behavior. The search head 210 allows the vendor's administrator to search the log data from the three systems that one or more indexers 206 are responsible for searching, thereby obtaining correlated information, such as the order number and corresponding customer ID number of the person placing the order. The system also allows the administrator to see a visualization of related events via a user interface. The administrator can query the search head 210 for customer ID field value matches across the log data from the three systems that are stored at the one or more indexers 206. The customer ID field value exists in the data gathered from the three systems, but the customer ID field value may be located in different areas of the data given differences in the architecture of the systems. There is a semantic relationship between the customer ID field values generated by the three systems. The search head 210 requests events from the one or more indexers 206 to gather relevant events from the three systems. The search head 210 then applies extraction rules to the events in order to extract field values that it can correlate. The search head may apply a different extraction rule to each set of events from each system when the event format differs among systems. In this example, the user interface can display to the administrator the events corresponding to the common customer ID field values 707, 708, and 709, thereby providing the administrator with insight into a customer's experience.

Note that query results can be returned to a client, a search head, or any other system component for further processing. In general, query results may include a set of one or more events, a set of one or more values obtained from the events, a subset of the values, statistics calculated based on the values, a report containing the values, a visualization (e.g., a graph or chart) generated from the values, and the like.

The search system enables users to run queries against the stored data to retrieve events that meet criteria specified in a query, such as containing certain keywords or having specific values in defined fields. FIG. 7B illustrates the manner in which keyword searches and field searches are processed in accordance with disclosed embodiments.

If a user inputs a search query into search bar 1401 that includes only keywords (also known as “tokens”), e.g., the keyword “error” or “warning”, the query search engine of the data intake and query system searches for those keywords directly in the event data 722 stored in the raw record data store. Note that while FIG. 7B only illustrates four events, the raw record data store (corresponding to data store 208 in FIG. 2) may contain records for millions of events.

As disclosed above, an indexer can optionally generate a keyword index to facilitate fast keyword searching for event data. The indexer includes the identified keywords in an index, which associates each stored keyword with reference pointers to events containing that keyword (or to locations within events where that keyword is located, other location identifiers, etc.). When an indexer subsequently receives a keyword-based query, the indexer can access the keyword index to quickly identify events containing the keyword. For example, if the keyword “HTTP” was indexed by the indexer at index time, and the user searches for the keyword “HTTP”, events 713 to 715 will be identified based on the results returned from the keyword index. As noted above, the index contains reference pointers to the events containing the keyword, which allows for efficient retrieval of the relevant events from the raw record data store.

If a user searches for a keyword that has not been indexed by the indexer, the data intake and query system would nevertheless be able to retrieve the events by searching the event data for the keyword in the raw record data store directly as shown in FIG. 7B. For example, if a user searches for the keyword “frank”, and the name “frank” has not been indexed at index time, the DATA INTAKE AND QUERY system will search the event data directly and return the first event 713. Note that whether the keyword has been indexed at index time or not, in both cases the raw data with the events 712 is accessed from the raw data record store to service the keyword search. In the case where the keyword has been indexed, the index will contain a reference pointer that will allow for a more efficient retrieval of the event data from the data store. If the keyword has not been indexed, the search engine will need to search through all the records in the data store to service the search.

In most cases, however, in addition to keywords, a user's search will also include fields. The term “field” refers to a location in the event data containing one or more values for a specific data item. Often, a field is a value with a fixed, delimited position on a line, or a name and value pair, where there is a single value to each field name. A field can also be multivalued, that is, it can appear more than once in an event and have a different value for each appearance, e.g., email address fields. Fields are searchable by the field name or field name-value pairs. Some examples of fields are “clientip” for IP addresses accessing a web server, or the “From” and “To” fields in email addresses.

By way of further example, consider the search, “status=404”. This search query finds events with “status” fields that have a value of “404.” When the search is run, the search engine does not look for events with any other “status” value. It also does not look for events containing other fields that share “404” as a value. As a result, the search returns a set of results that are more focused than if “404” had been used in the search string as part of a keyword search. Note also that fields can appear in events as “key=value” pairs such as “user_name=Bob.” But in most cases, field values appear in fixed, delimited positions without identifying keys. For example, the data store may contain events where the “user_name” value always appears by itself after the timestamp as illustrated by the following string: “November 15 09:33:22 johnmedlock.”

The data intake and query system advantageously allows for search time field extraction. In other words, fields can be extracted from the event data at search time using late-binding schema as opposed to at data ingestion time, which was a major limitation of the prior art systems.

In response to receiving the search query, search head 210 uses extraction rules to extract values for the fields associated with a field or fields in the event data being searched. The search head 210 obtains extraction rules that specify how to extract a value for certain fields from an event. Extraction rules can comprise regex rules that specify how to extract values for the relevant fields. In addition to specifying how to extract field values, the extraction rules may also include instructions for deriving a field value by performing a function on a character string or value retrieved by the extraction rule. For example, a transformation rule may truncate a character string, or convert the character string into a different data format. In some cases, the query itself can specify one or more extraction rules.

FIG. 7B illustrates the manner in which configuration files may be used to configure custom fields at search time in accordance with the disclosed embodiments. In response to receiving a search query, the data intake and query system determines if the query references a “field.” For example, a query may request a list of events where the “clientip” field equals “127.0.0.1.” If the query itself does not specify an extraction rule and if the field is not a metadata field, e.g., time, host, source, source type, etc., then in order to determine an extraction rule, the search engine may, in one or more embodiments, need to locate configuration file 712 during the execution of the search as shown in FIG. 7B.

Configuration file 712 may contain extraction rules for all the various fields that are not metadata fields, e.g., the “clientip” field. The extraction rules may be inserted into the configuration file in a variety of ways. In some embodiments, the extraction rules can comprise regular expression rules that are manually entered in by the user. Regular expressions match patterns of characters in text and are used for extracting custom fields in text.

In one or more embodiments, as noted above, a field extractor may be configured to automatically generate extraction rules for certain field values in the events when the events are being created, indexed, or stored, or possibly at a later time. In one embodiment, a user may be able to dynamically create custom fields by highlighting portions of a sample event that should be extracted as fields using a graphical user interface. The system would then generate a regular expression that extracts those fields from similar events and store the regular expression as an extraction rule for the associated field in the configuration file 712.

In some embodiments, the indexers may automatically discover certain custom fields at index time and the regular expressions for those fields will be automatically generated at index time and stored as part of extraction rules in configuration file 712. For example, fields that appear in the event data as “key=value” pairs may be automatically extracted as part of an automatic field discovery process. Note that there may be several other ways of adding field definitions to configuration files in addition to the methods discussed herein.

The search head 210 can apply the extraction rules derived from configuration file 1402 to event data that it receives from indexers 206. Indexers 206 may apply the extraction rules from the configuration file to events in an associated data store 208. Extraction rules can be applied to all the events in a data store, or to a subset of the events that have been filtered based on some criteria (e.g., event time stamp values, etc.). Extraction rules can be used to extract one or more values for a field from events by parsing the event data and examining the event data for one or more patterns of characters, numbers, delimiters, etc., that indicate where the field begins and, optionally, ends.

In one more embodiments, the extraction rule in configuration file 712 will also need to define the type or set of events that the rule applies to. Because the raw record data store will contain events from multiple heterogeneous sources, multiple events may contain the same fields in different locations because of discrepancies in the format of the data generated by the various sources. Furthermore, certain events may not contain a particular field at all. For example, event 719 also contains “clientip” field, however, the “clientip” field is in a different format from events 713-715. To address the discrepancies in the format and content of the different types of events, the configuration file will also need to specify the set of events that an extraction rule applies to, e.g., extraction rule 716 specifies a rule for filtering by the type of event and contains a regular expression for parsing out the field value. Accordingly, each extraction rule will pertain to only a particular type of event. If a particular field, e.g., “clientip” occurs in multiple events, each of those types of events would need its own corresponding extraction rule in the configuration file 712 and each of the extraction rules would comprise a different regular expression to parse out the associated field value. The most common way to categorize events is by source type because events generated by a particular source can have the same format.

The field extraction rules stored in configuration file 712 perform search-time field extractions. For example, for a query that requests a list of events with source type “access_combined” where the “clientip” field equals “127.0.0.1,” the query search engine would first locate the configuration file 712 to retrieve extraction rule 716 that would allow it to extract values associated with the “clientip” field from the event data 720 “where the source type is “access_combined. After the “clientip” field has been extracted from all the events comprising the “clientip” field where the source type is “access_combined,” the query search engine can then execute the field criteria by performing the compare operation to filter out the events where the “clientip” field equals “127.0.0.1.” In the example shown in FIG. 7B, events 713-715 would be returned in response to the user query. In this manner, the search engine can service queries containing field criteria in addition to queries containing keyword criteria (as explained above).

The configuration file can be created during indexing. It may either be manually created by the user or automatically generated with certain predetermined field extraction rules. As discussed above, the events may be distributed across several indexers, wherein each indexer may be responsible for storing and searching a subset of the events contained in a corresponding data store. In a distributed indexer system, each indexer would need to maintain a local copy of the configuration file that is synchronized periodically across the various indexers.

The ability to add schema to the configuration file at search time results in increased efficiency. A user can create new fields at search time and simply add field definitions to the configuration file. As a user learns more about the data in the events, the user can continue to refine the late-binding schema by adding new fields, deleting fields, or modifying the field extraction rules in the configuration file for use the next time the schema is used by the system. Because the data intake and query system maintains the underlying raw data and uses late-binding schema for searching the raw data, it enables a user to continue investigating and learn valuable insights about the raw data long after data ingestion time.

The ability to add multiple field definitions to the configuration file at search time also results in increased flexibility. For example, multiple field definitions can be added to the configuration file to capture the same field across events generated by different source types. This allows the data intake and query system to search and correlate data across heterogeneous sources flexibly and efficiently.

Further, by providing the field definitions for the queried fields at search time, the configuration file 712 allows the record data store 712 to be field searchable. In other words, the raw record data store 712 can be searched using keywords as well as fields, wherein the fields are searchable name/value pairings that distinguish one event from another and can be defined in configuration file 1402 using extraction rules. In comparison to a search containing field names, a keyword search does not need the configuration file and can search the event data directly as shown in FIG. 7B.

It should also be noted that any events filtered out by performing a search-time field extraction using a configuration file can be further processed by directing the results of the filtering step to a processing step using a pipelined search language. Using the prior example, a user could pipeline the results of the compare step to an aggregate function by asking the query search engine to count the number of events where the “clientip” field equals “127.0.0.1.”

2.11. Example Search Screen

FIG. 8A is an interface diagram of an example user interface for a search screen 800, in accordance with example embodiments. Search screen 800 includes a search bar 802 that accepts user input in the form of a search string. It also includes a time range picker 812 that enables the user to specify a time range for the search. For historical searches (e.g., searches based on a particular historical time range), the user can select a specific time range, or alternatively a relative time range, such as “today,” “yesterday” or “last week.” For real-time searches (e.g., searches whose results are based on data received in real-time), the user can select the size of a preceding time window to search for real-time events. Search screen 800 also initially displays a “data summary” dialog as is illustrated in FIG. 8B that enables the user to select different sources for the events, such as by selecting specific hosts and log files.

After the search is executed, the search screen 800 in FIG. 8A can display the results through search results tabs 804, wherein search results tabs 804 includes: an “events tab” that displays various information about events returned by the search; a “statistics tab” that displays statistics about the search results; and a “visualization tab” that displays various visualizations of the search results. The events tab illustrated in FIG. 8A displays a timeline graph 805 that graphically illustrates the number of events that occurred in one-hour intervals over the selected time range. The events tab also displays an events list 808 that enables a user to view the machine data in each of the returned events.

The events tab additionally displays a sidebar that is an interactive field picker 806. The field picker 806 may be displayed to a user in response to the search being executed and allows the user to further analyze the search results based on the fields in the events of the search results. The field picker 806 includes field names that reference fields present in the events in the search results. The field picker may display any Selected Fields 820 that a user has pre-selected for display (e.g., host, source, sourcetype) and may also display any Interesting Fields 822 that the system determines may be interesting to the user based on pre-specified criteria (e.g., action, bytes, categoryid, clientip, date_hour, date_mday, date_minute, etc.). The field picker also provides an option to display field names for all the fields present in the events of the search results using the All Fields control 824.

Each field name in the field picker 806 has a value type identifier to the left of the field name, such as value type identifier 826. A value type identifier identifies the type of value for the respective field, such as an “a” for fields that include literal values or a “#” for fields that include numerical values.

Each field name in the field picker also has a unique value count to the right of the field name, such as unique value count 828. The unique value count indicates the number of unique values for the respective field in the events of the search results.

Each field name is selectable to view the events in the search results that have the field referenced by that field name. For example, a user can select the “host” field name, and the events shown in the events list 808 will be updated with events in the search results that have the field that is reference by the field name “host.”

2.12. Data Models

A data model is a hierarchically structured search-time mapping of semantic knowledge about one or more datasets. It encodes the domain knowledge used to build a variety of specialized searches of those datasets. Those searches, in turn, can be used to generate reports.

A data model is composed of one or more “objects” (or “data model objects”) that define or otherwise correspond to a specific set of data. An object is defined by constraints and attributes. An object's constraints are search criteria that define the set of events to be operated on by running a search having that search criteria at the time the data model is selected. An object's attributes are the set of fields to be exposed for operating on that set of events generated by the search criteria.

Objects in data models can be arranged hierarchically in parent/child relationships. Each child object represents a subset of the dataset covered by its parent object. The top-level objects in data models are collectively referred to as “root objects.”

Child objects have inheritance. Child objects inherit constraints and attributes from their parent objects and may have additional constraints and attributes of their own. Child objects provide a way of filtering events from parent objects. Because a child object may provide an additional constraint in addition to the constraints it has inherited from its parent object, the dataset it represents may be a subset of the dataset that its parent represents. For example, a first data model object may define a broad set of data pertaining to e-mail activity generally, and another data model object may define specific datasets within the broad dataset, such as a subset of the e-mail data pertaining specifically to e-mails sent. For example, a user can simply select an “e-mail activity” data model object to access a dataset relating to e-mails generally (e.g., sent or received), or select an “e-mails sent” data model object (or data sub-model object) to access a dataset relating to e-mails sent.

Because a data model object is defined by its constraints (e.g., a set of search criteria) and attributes (e.g., a set of fields), a data model object can be used to quickly search data to identify a set of events and to identify a set of fields to be associated with the set of events. For example, an “e-mails sent” data model object may specify a search for events relating to e-mails that have been sent, and specify a set of fields that are associated with the events. Thus, a user can retrieve and use the “e-mails sent” data model object to quickly search source data for events relating to sent e-mails, and may be provided with a listing of the set of fields relevant to the events in a user interface screen.

Examples of data models can include electronic mail, authentication, databases, intrusion detection, malware, application state, alerts, compute inventory, network sessions, network traffic, performance, audits, updates, vulnerabilities, etc. Data models and their objects can be designed by knowledge managers in an organization, and they can enable downstream users to quickly focus on a specific set of data. A user iteratively applies a model development tool (not shown in FIG. 8A) to prepare a query that defines a subset of events and assigns an object name to that subset. A child subset is created by further limiting a query that generated a parent subset.

Data definitions in associated schemas can be taken from the common information model (CIM) or can be devised for a particular schema and optionally added to the CIM. Child objects inherit fields from parents and can include fields not present in parents. A model developer can select fewer extraction rules than are available for the sources returned by the query that defines events belonging to a model. Selecting a limited set of extraction rules can be a tool for simplifying and focusing the data model, while allowing a user flexibility to explore the data subset. Development of a data model is further explained in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,788,525 and 8,788,526, both entitled “DATA MODEL FOR MACHINE DATA FOR SEMANTIC SEARCH”, both issued on 22 Jul. 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 8,983,994, entitled “GENERATION OF A DATA MODEL FOR SEARCHING MACHINE DATA”, issued on 17 Mar. 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,128,980, entitled “GENERATION OF A DATA MODEL APPLIED TO QUERIES”, issued on 8 Sep. 2015, and U.S. Pat. No. 9,589,012, entitled “GENERATION OF A DATA MODEL APPLIED TO OBJECT QUERIES”, issued on 7 Mar. 2017, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

A data model can also include reports. One or more report formats can be associated with a particular data model and be made available to run against the data model. A user can use child objects to design reports with object datasets that already have extraneous data pre-filtered out. In some embodiments, the data intake and query system 108 provides the user with the ability to produce reports (e.g., a table, chart, visualization, etc.) without having to enter SPL, SQL, or other query language terms into a search screen. Data models are used as the basis for the search feature.

Data models may be selected in a report generation interface. The report generator supports drag-and-drop organization of fields to be summarized in a report. When a model is selected, the fields with available extraction rules are made available for use in the report. The user may refine and/or filter search results to produce more precise reports. The user may select some fields for organizing the report and select other fields for providing detail according to the report organization. For example, “region” and “salesperson” are fields used for organizing the report and sales data can be summarized (subtotaled and totaled) within this organization. The report generator allows the user to specify one or more fields within events and apply statistical analysis on values extracted from the specified one or more fields. The report generator may aggregate search results across sets of events and generate statistics based on aggregated search results. Building reports using the report generation interface is further explained in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/503,335, entitled “GENERATING REPORTS FROM UNSTRUCTURED DATA”, filed on 30 Sep. 2014, and which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes. Data visualizations also can be generated in a variety of formats, by reference to the data model. Reports, data visualizations, and data model objects can be saved and associated with the data model for future use. The data model object may be used to perform searches of other data.

FIGS. 9-15 are interface diagrams of example report generation user interfaces, in accordance with example embodiments. The report generation process may be driven by a predefined data model object, such as a data model object defined and/or saved via a reporting application or a data model object obtained from another source. A user can load a saved data model object using a report editor. For example, the initial search query and fields used to drive the report editor may be obtained from a data model object. The data model object that is used to drive a report generation process may define a search and a set of fields. Upon loading of the data model object, the report generation process may enable a user to use the fields (e.g., the fields defined by the data model object) to define criteria for a report (e.g., filters, split rows/columns, aggregates, etc.) and the search may be used to identify events (e.g., to identify events responsive to the search) used to generate the report. That is, for example, if a data model object is selected to drive a report editor, the graphical user interface of the report editor may enable a user to define reporting criteria for the report using the fields associated with the selected data model object, and the events used to generate the report may be constrained to the events that match, or otherwise satisfy, the search constraints of the selected data model object.

The selection of a data model object for use in driving a report generation may be facilitated by a data model object selection interface. FIG. 9 illustrates an example interactive data model selection graphical user interface 900 of a report editor that displays a listing of available data models 901. The user may select one of the data models 902.

FIG. 10 illustrates an example data model object selection graphical user interface 1000 that displays available data objects 1001 for the selected data object model 902. The user may select one of the displayed data model objects 1002 for use in driving the report generation process.

Once a data model object is selected by the user, a user interface screen 1100 shown in FIG. 11A may display an interactive listing of automatic field identification options 1101 based on the selected data model object. For example, a user may select one of the three illustrated options (e.g., the “All Fields” option 1102, the “Selected Fields” option 1103, or the “Coverage” option (e.g., fields with at least a specified % of coverage) 1104). If the user selects the “All Fields” option 1102, all of the fields identified from the events that were returned in response to an initial search query may be selected. That is, for example, all of the fields of the identified data model object fields may be selected. If the user selects the “Selected Fields” option 1103, only the fields from the fields of the identified data model object fields that are selected by the user may be used. If the user selects the “Coverage” option 1104, only the fields of the identified data model object fields meeting a specified coverage criteria may be selected. A percent coverage may refer to the percentage of events returned by the initial search query that a given field appears in. Thus, for example, if an object dataset includes 10,000 events returned in response to an initial search query, and the “avg_age” field appears in 854 of those 10,000 events, then the “avg_age” field would have a coverage of 8.54% for that object dataset. If, for example, the user selects the “Coverage” option and specifies a coverage value of 2%, only fields having a coverage value equal to or greater than 2% may be selected. The number of fields corresponding to each selectable option may be displayed in association with each option. For example, “97” displayed next to the “All Fields” option 1102 indicates that 97 fields will be selected if the “All Fields” option is selected. The “3” displayed next to the “Selected Fields” option 1103 indicates that 3 of the 97 fields will be selected if the “Selected Fields” option is selected. The “49” displayed next to the “Coverage” option 1104 indicates that 49 of the 97 fields (e.g., the 49 fields having a coverage of 2% or greater) will be selected if the “Coverage” option is selected. The number of fields corresponding to the “Coverage” option may be dynamically updated based on the specified percent of coverage.

FIG. 11B illustrates an example graphical user interface screen 1105 displaying the reporting application's “Report Editor” page. The screen may display interactive elements for defining various elements of a report. For example, the page includes a “Filters” element 1106, a “Split Rows” element 1107, a “Split Columns” element 1108, and a “Column Values” element 1109. The page may include a list of search results 1111. In this example, the Split Rows element 1107 is expanded, revealing a listing of fields 1110 that can be used to define additional criteria (e.g., reporting criteria). The listing of fields 1110 may correspond to the selected fields. That is, the listing of fields 1110 may list only the fields previously selected, either automatically and/or manually by a user. FIG. 11C illustrates a formatting dialogue 1112 that may be displayed upon selecting a field from the listing of fields 1110. The dialogue can be used to format the display of the results of the selection (e.g., label the column for the selected field to be displayed as “component”).

FIG. 11D illustrates an example graphical user interface screen 1105 including a table of results 1113 based on the selected criteria including splitting the rows by the “component” field. A column 1114 having an associated count for each component listed in the table may be displayed that indicates an aggregate count of the number of times that the particular field-value pair (e.g., the value in a row for a particular field, such as the value “BucketMover” for the field “component”) occurs in the set of events responsive to the initial search query.

FIG. 12 illustrates an example graphical user interface screen 1200 that allows the user to filter search results and to perform statistical analysis on values extracted from specific fields in the set of events. In this example, the top ten product names ranked by price are selected as a filter 1201 that causes the display of the ten most popular products sorted by price. Each row is displayed by product name and price 1202. This results in each product displayed in a column labeled “product name” along with an associated price in a column labeled “price” 1206. Statistical analysis of other fields in the events associated with the ten most popular products have been specified as column values 1203. A count of the number of successful purchases for each product is displayed in column 1204. These statistics may be produced by filtering the search results by the product name, finding all occurrences of a successful purchase in a field within the events and generating a total of the number of occurrences. A sum of the total sales is displayed in column 1205, which is a result of the multiplication of the price and the number of successful purchases for each product.

The reporting application allows the user to create graphical visualizations of the statistics generated for a report. For example, FIG. 13 illustrates an example graphical user interface 1300 that displays a set of components and associated statistics 1301. The reporting application allows the user to select a visualization of the statistics in a graph (e.g., bar chart, scatter plot, area chart, line chart, pie chart, radial gauge, marker gauge, filler gauge, etc.), where the format of the graph may be selected using the user interface controls 1302 along the left panel of the user interface 1300. FIG. 14 illustrates an example of a bar chart visualization 1400 of an aspect of the statistical data 1301. FIG. 15 illustrates a scatter plot visualization 1500 of an aspect of the statistical data 1301.

2.13. Acceleration Technique

The above-described system provides significant flexibility by enabling a user to analyze massive quantities of minimally-processed data “on the fly” at search time using a late-binding schema, instead of storing pre-specified portions of the data in a database at ingestion time. This flexibility enables a user to see valuable insights, correlate data, and perform subsequent queries to examine interesting aspects of the data that may not have been apparent at ingestion time.

However, performing extraction and analysis operations at search time can involve a large amount of data and require a large number of computational operations, which can cause delays in processing the queries. Advantageously, the data intake and query system also employs a number of unique acceleration techniques that have been developed to speed up analysis operations performed at search time. These techniques include: (1) performing search operations in parallel across multiple indexers; (2) using a keyword index; (3) using a high performance analytics store; and (4) accelerating the process of generating reports. These novel techniques are described in more detail below.

2.13.1. Aggregation Technique

To facilitate faster query processing, a query can be structured such that multiple indexers perform the query in parallel, while aggregation of search results from the multiple indexers is performed locally at the search head. For example, FIG. 16 is an example search query received from a client and executed by search peers, in accordance with example embodiments. FIG. 16 illustrates how a search query 1602 received from a client at a search head 210 can split into two phases, including: (1) subtasks 1604 (e.g., data retrieval or simple filtering) that may be performed in parallel by indexers 206 for execution, and (2) a search results aggregation operation 1606 to be executed by the search head when the results are ultimately collected from the indexers.

During operation, upon receiving search query 1602, a search head 210 determines that a portion of the operations involved with the search query may be performed locally by the search head. The search head modifies search query 1602 by substituting “stats” (create aggregate statistics over results sets received from the indexers at the search head) with “prestats” (create statistics by the indexer from local results set) to produce search query 1604, and then distributes search query 1604 to distributed indexers, which are also referred to as “search peers” or “peer indexers.” Note that search queries may generally specify search criteria or operations to be performed on events that meet the search criteria. Search queries may also specify field names, as well as search criteria for the values in the fields or operations to be performed on the values in the fields. Moreover, the search head may distribute the full search query to the search peers as illustrated in FIG. 6A, or may alternatively distribute a modified version (e.g., a more restricted version) of the search query to the search peers. In this example, the indexers are responsible for producing the results and sending them to the search head. After the indexers return the results to the search head, the search head aggregates the received results 1606 to form a single search result set. By executing the query in this manner, the system effectively distributes the computational operations across the indexers while minimizing data transfers.

2.13.2. Keyword Index

As described above with reference to the flow charts in FIG. 5A and FIG. 6A, data intake and query system 108 can construct and maintain one or more keyword indices to quickly identify events containing specific keywords. This technique can greatly speed up the processing of queries involving specific keywords. As mentioned above, to build a keyword index, an indexer first identifies a set of keywords. Then, the indexer includes the identified keywords in an index, which associates each stored keyword with references to events containing that keyword, or to locations within events where that keyword is located. When an indexer subsequently receives a keyword-based query, the indexer can access the keyword index to quickly identify events containing the keyword.

2.13.3. High Performance Analytics Store

To speed up certain types of queries, some embodiments of system 108 create a high performance analytics store, which is referred to as a “summarization table,” that contains entries for specific field-value pairs. Each of these entries keeps track of instances of a specific value in a specific field in the events and includes references to events containing the specific value in the specific field. For example, an example entry in a summarization table can keep track of occurrences of the value “94107” in a “ZIP code” field of a set of events and the entry includes references to all of the events that contain the value “94107” in the ZIP code field. This optimization technique enables the system to quickly process queries that seek to determine how many events have a particular value for a particular field. To this end, the system can examine the entry in the summarization table to count instances of the specific value in the field without having to go through the individual events or perform data extractions at search time. Also, if the system needs to process all events that have a specific field-value combination, the system can use the references in the summarization table entry to directly access the events to extract further information without having to search all of the events to find the specific field-value combination at search time.

In some embodiments, the system maintains a separate summarization table for each of the above-described time-specific buckets that stores events for a specific time range. A bucket-specific summarization table includes entries for specific field-value combinations that occur in events in the specific bucket. Alternatively, the system can maintain a separate summarization table for each indexer. The indexer-specific summarization table includes entries for the events in a data store that are managed by the specific indexer. Indexer-specific summarization tables may also be bucket-specific.

The summarization table can be populated by running a periodic query that scans a set of events to find instances of a specific field-value combination, or alternatively instances of all field-value combinations for a specific field. A periodic query can be initiated by a user, or can be scheduled to occur automatically at specific time intervals. A periodic query can also be automatically launched in response to a query that asks for a specific field-value combination.

In some cases, when the summarization tables may not cover all of the events that are relevant to a query, the system can use the summarization tables to obtain partial results for the events that are covered by summarization tables, but may also have to search through other events that are not covered by the summarization tables to produce additional results. These additional results can then be combined with the partial results to produce a final set of results for the query. The summarization table and associated techniques are described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 8,682,925, entitled “DISTRIBUTED HIGH PERFORMANCE ANALYTICS STORE”, issued on 25 Mar. 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 9,128,985, entitled “SUPPLEMENTING A HIGH PERFORMANCE ANALYTICS STORE WITH EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL EVENTS TO RESPOND TO AN EVENT QUERY”, issued on 8 Sep. 2015, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/815,973, entitled “GENERATING AND STORING SUMMARIZATION TABLES FOR SETS OF SEARCHABLE EVENTS”, filed on 1 Aug. 2015, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

To speed up certain types of queries, e.g., frequently encountered queries or computationally intensive queries, some embodiments of system 108 create a high performance analytics store, which is referred to as a “summarization table,” (also referred to as a “lexicon” or “inverted index”) that contains entries for specific field-value pairs. Each of these entries keeps track of instances of a specific value in a specific field in the event data and includes references to events containing the specific value in the specific field. For example, an example entry in an inverted index can keep track of occurrences of the value “94107” in a “ZIP code” field of a set of events and the entry includes references to all of the events that contain the value “94107” in the ZIP code field. Creating the inverted index data structure avoids needing to incur the computational overhead each time a statistical query needs to be run on a frequently encountered field-value pair. In order to expedite queries, in most embodiments, the search engine will employ the inverted index separate from the raw record data store to generate responses to the received queries.

Note that the term “summarization table” or “inverted index” as used herein is a data structure that may be generated by an indexer that includes at least field names and field values that have been extracted and/or indexed from event records. An inverted index may also include reference values that point to the location(s) in the field searchable data store where the event records that include the field may be found. Also, an inverted index may be stored using well-know compression techniques to reduce its storage size.

Further, note that the term “reference value” (also referred to as a “posting value”) as used herein is a value that references the location of a source record in the field searchable data store. In some embodiments, the reference value may include additional information about each record, such as timestamps, record size, meta-data, or the like. Each reference value may be a unique identifier which may be used to access the event data directly in the field searachable data store. In some embodiments, the reference values may be ordered based on each event record's timestamp. For example, if numbers are used as identifiers, they may be sorted so event records having a later timestamp always have a lower valued identifier than event records with an earlier timestamp, or vice-versa. Reference values are often included in inverted indexes for retrieving and/or identifying event records.

In one or more embodiments, an inverted index is generated in response to a user-initiated collection query. The term “collection query” as used herein refers to queries that include commands that generate summarization information and inverted indexes (or summarization tables) from event records stored in the field searchable data store.

Note that a collection query is a special type of query that can be user-generated and is used to create an inverted index. A collection query is not the same as a query that is used to call up or invoke a pre-existing inverted index. In one or more embodiment, a query can comprise an initial step that calls up a pre-generated inverted index on which further filtering and processing can be performed. For example, referring back to FIG. 13, a set of events generated at block 1320 by either using a “collection” query to create a new inverted index or by calling up a pre-generated inverted index. A query with several pipelined steps will start with a pre-generated index to accelerate the query.

FIG. 7C illustrates the manner in which an inverted index is created and used in accordance with the disclosed embodiments. As shown in FIG. 7C, an inverted index 722 can be created in response to a user-initiated collection query using the event data 723 stored in the raw record data store. For example, a non-limiting example of a collection query may include “collect clientip=127.0.0.1” which may result in an inverted index 722 being generated from the event data 723 as shown in FIG. 7C. Each entry in invertex index 722 includes an event reference value that references the location of a source record in the field searchable data store. The reference value may be used to access the original event record directly from the field searchable data store.

In one or more embodiments, if one or more of the queries is a collection query, the responsive indexers may generate summarization information based on the fields of the event records located in the field searchable data store. In at least one of the various embodiments, one or more of the fields used in the summarization information may be listed in the collection query and/or they may be determined based on terms included in the collection query. For example, a collection query may include an explicit list of fields to summarize. Or, in at least one of the various embodiments, a collection query may include terms or expressions that explicitly define the fields, e.g., using regex rules. In FIG. 7C, prior to running the collection query that generates the inverted index 722, the field name “clientip” may need to be defined in a configuration file by specifying the “access_combined” source type and a regular expression rule to parse out the client IP_address. Alternatively, the collection query may contain an explicit definition for the field name “clientip” which may obviate the need to reference the configuration file at search time.

In one or more embodiments, collection queries may be saved and scheduled to run periodically. These scheduled collection queries may periodically update the summarization information corresponding to the query. For example, if the collection query that generates inverted index 722 is scheduled to run periodically, one or more indexers would periodically search through the relevant buckets to update inverted index 722 with event data for any new events with the “clientip” value of “127.0.0.1.”

In some embodiments, the inverted indexes that include fields, values, and reference value (e.g., inverted index 722) for event records may be included in the summarization information provided to the user. In other embodiments, a user may not be interested in specific fields and values contained in the inverted index, but may need to perform a statistical query on the data in the inverted index. For example, referencing the example of FIG. 7C rather than viewing the fields within summarization table 722, a user may want to generate a count of all client requests from IP_address “127.0.0.1.” In this case, the search engine would simply return a result of “4” rather than including details about the inverted index 722 in the information provided to the user.

The pipelined search language, e.g., SPL of the SPLUNK® ENTERPRISE system can be used to pipe the contents of an inverted index to a statistical query using the “stats” command for example. A “stats” query refers to queries that generate result sets that may produce aggregate and statistical results from event records, e.g., average, mean, max, min, rms, etc. Where sufficient information is available in an inverted index, a “stats” query may generate their result sets rapidly from the summarization information available in the inverted index rather than directly scanning event records. For example, the contents of inverted index 722 can be pipelined to a stats query, e.g., a “count” function that counts the number of entries in the inverted index and returns a value of “4.” In this way, inverted indexes may enable various stats queries to be performed absent scanning or search the event records. Accordingly, this optimization technique enables the system to quickly process queries that seek to determine how many events have a particular value for a particular field. To this end, the system can examine the entry in the inverted index to count instances of the specific value in the field without having to go through the individual events or perform data extractions at search time.

In some embodiments, the system maintains a separate inverted index for each of the above-described time-specific buckets that stores events for a specific time range. A bucket-specific inverted index includes entries for specific field-value combinations that occur in events in the specific bucket. Alternatively, the system can maintain a separate inverted index for each indexer. The indexer-specific inverted index includes entries for the events in a data store that are managed by the specific indexer. Indexer-specific inverted indexes may also be bucket-specific. In at least one or more embodiments, if one or more of the queries is a stats query, each indexer may generate a partial result set from previously generated summarization information. The partial result sets may be returned to the search head that received the query and combined into a single result set for the query

As mentioned above, the inverted index can be populated by running a periodic query that scans a set of events to find instances of a specific field-value combination, or alternatively instances of all field-value combinations for a specific field. A periodic query can be initiated by a user, or can be scheduled to occur automatically at specific time intervals. A periodic query can also be automatically launched in response to a query that asks for a specific field-value combination. In some embodiments, if summarization information is absent from an indexer that includes responsive event records, further actions may be taken, such as, the summarization information may generated on the fly, warnings may be provided the user, the collection query operation may be halted, the absence of summarization information may be ignored, or the like, or combination thereof.

In one or more embodiments, an inverted index may be set up to update continually. For example, the query may ask for the inverted index to update its result periodically, e.g., every hour. In such instances, the inverted index may be a dynamic data structure that is regularly updated to include information regarding incoming events.

In some cases, e.g., where a query is executed before an inverted index updates, when the inverted index may not cover all of the events that are relevant to a query, the system can use the inverted index to obtain partial results for the events that are covered by inverted index, but may also have to search through other events that are not covered by the inverted index to produce additional results on the fly. In other words, an indexer would need to search through event data on the data store to supplement the partial results. These additional results can then be combined with the partial results to produce a final set of results for the query. Note that in typical instances where an inverted index is not completely up to date, the number of events that an indexer would need to search through to supplement the results from the inverted index would be relatively small. In other words, the search to get the most recent results can be quick and efficient because only a small number of event records will be searched through to supplement the information from the inverted index. The inverted index and associated techniques are described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 8,682,925, entitled “DISTRIBUTED HIGH PERFORMANCE ANALYTICS STORE”, issued on 25 Mar. 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 9,128,985, entitled “SUPPLEMENTING A HIGH PERFORMANCE ANALYTICS STORE WITH EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL EVENTS TO RESPOND TO AN EVENT QUERY”, filed on 31 Jan. 2014, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/815,973, entitled “STORAGE MEDIUM AND CONTROL DEVICE”, filed on 21 Feb. 2014, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

2.13.3.1. Extracting Event Data Using Posting

In one or more embodiments, if the system needs to process all events that have a specific field-value combination, the system can use the references in the inverted index entry to directly access the events to extract further information without having to search all of the events to find the specific field-value combination at search time. In other words, the system can use the reference values to locate the associated event data in the field searchable data store and extract further information from those events, e.g., extract further field values from the events for purposes of filtering or processing or both.

The information extracted from the event data using the reference values can be directed for further filtering or processing in a query using the pipeline search language. The pipelined search language will, in one embodiment, include syntax that can direct the initial filtering step in a query to an inverted index. In one embodiment, a user would include syntax in the query that explicitly directs the initial searching or filtering step to the inverted index.

Referencing the example in FIG. 15, if the user determines that she needs the user id fields associated with the client requests from IP address “127.0.0.1,” instead of incurring the computational overhead of performing a brand new search or re-generating the inverted index with an additional field, the user can generate a query that explicitly directs or pipes the contents of the already generated inverted index 1502 to another filtering step requesting the user ids for the entries in inverted index 1502 where the server response time is greater than “0.0900” microseconds. The search engine would use the reference values stored in inverted index 722 to retrieve the event data from the field searchable data store, filter the results based on the “response time” field values and, further, extract the user id field from the resulting event data to return to the user. In the present instance, the user ids “frank” and “carlos” would be returned to the user from the generated results table 722.

In one embodiment, the same methodology can be used to pipe the contents of the inverted index to a processing step. In other words, the user is able to use the inverted index to efficiently and quickly perform aggregate functions on field values that were not part of the initially generated inverted index. For example, a user may want to determine an average object size (size of the requested gif) requested by clients from IP address “127.0.0.1.” In this case, the search engine would again use the reference values stored in inverted index 722 to retrieve the event data from the field searchable data store and, further, extract the object size field values from the associated events 731, 732, 733 and 734. Once, the corresponding object sizes have been extracted (i.e. 2326, 2900, 2920, and 5000), the average can be computed and returned to the user.

In one embodiment, instead of explicitly invoking the inverted index in a user-generated query, e.g., by the use of special commands or syntax, the SPLUNK® ENTERPRISE system can be configured to automatically determine if any prior-generated inverted index can be used to expedite a user query. For example, the user's query may request the average object size (size of the requested gif) requested by clients from IP address “127.0.0.1.” without any reference to or use of inverted index 722. The search engine, in this case, would automatically determine that an inverted index 722 already exists in the system that could expedite this query. In one embodiment, prior to running any search comprising a field-value pair, for example, a search engine may search though all the existing inverted indexes to determine if a pre-generated inverted index could be used to expedite the search comprising the field-value pair. Accordingly, the search engine would automatically use the pre-generated inverted index, e.g., index 722 to generate the results without any user-involvement that directs the use of the index.

Using the reference values in an inverted index to be able to directly access the event data in the field searchable data store and extract further information from the associated event data for further filtering and processing is highly advantageous because it avoids incurring the computation overhead of regenerating the inverted index with additional fields or performing a new search.

The data intake and query system includes one or more forwarders that receive raw machine data from a variety of input data sources, and one or more indexers that process and store the data in one or more data stores. By distributing events among the indexers and data stores, the indexers can analyze events for a query in parallel. In one or more embodiments, a multiple indexer implementation of the search system would maintain a separate and respective inverted index for each of the above-described time-specific buckets that stores events for a specific time range. A bucket-specific inverted index includes entries for specific field-value combinations that occur in events in the specific bucket. As explained above, a search head would be able to correlate and synthesize data from across the various buckets and indexers.

This feature advantageously expedites searches because instead of performing a computationally intensive search in a centrally located inverted index that catalogues all the relevant events, an indexer is able to directly search an inverted index stored in a bucket associated with the time-range specified in the query. This allows the search to be performed in parallel across the various indexers. Further, if the query requests further filtering or processing to be conducted on the event data referenced by the locally stored bucket-specific inverted index, the indexer is able to simply access the event records stored in the associated bucket for further filtering and processing instead of needing to access a central repository of event records, which would dramatically add to the computational overhead.

In one embodiment, there may be multiple buckets associated with the time-range specified in a query. If the query is directed to an inverted index, or if the search engine automatically determines that using an inverted index would expedite the processing of the query, the indexers will search through each of the inverted indexes associated with the buckets for the specified time-range. This feature allows the High Performance Analytics Store to be scaled easily.

In certain instances, where a query is executed before a bucket-specific inverted index updates, when the bucket-specific inverted index may not cover all of the events that are relevant to a query, the system can use the bucket-specific inverted index to obtain partial results for the events that are covered by bucket-specific inverted index, but may also have to search through the event data in the bucket associated with the bucket-specific inverted index to produce additional results on the fly. In other words, an indexer would need to search through event data stored in the bucket (that was not yet processed by the indexer for the corresponding inverted index) to supplement the partial results from the bucket-specific inverted index.

FIG. 7D presents a flowchart illustrating how an inverted index in a pipelined search query can be used to determine a set of event data that can be further limited by filtering or processing in accordance with the disclosed embodiments.

At block 742, a query is received by a data intake and query system. In some embodiments, the query can be receive as a user generated query entered into search bar of a graphical user search interface. The search interface also includes a time range control element that enables specification of a time range for the query.

At block 744, an inverted index is retrieved. Note, that the inverted index can be retrieved in response to an explicit user search command inputted as part of the user generated query. Alternatively, the search engine can be configured to automatically use an inverted index if it determines that using the inverted index would expedite the servicing of the user generated query. Each of the entries in an inverted index keeps track of instances of a specific value in a specific field in the event data and includes references to events containing the specific value in the specific field. In order to expedite queries, in most embodiments, the search engine will employ the inverted index separate from the raw record data store to generate responses to the received queries.

At block 746, the query engine determines if the query contains further filtering and processing steps. If the query contains no further commands, then, in one embodiment, summarization information can be provided to the user at block 754.

If, however, the query does contain further filtering and processing commands, then at block 750, the query engine determines if the commands relate to further filtering or processing of the data extracted as part of the inverted index or whether the commands are directed to using the inverted index as an initial filtering step to further filter and process event data referenced by the entries in the inverted index. If the query can be completed using data already in the generated inverted index, then the further filtering or processing steps, e.g., a “count” number of records function, “average” number of records per hour etc. are performed and the results are provided to the user at block 752.

If, however, the query references fields that are not extracted in the inverted index, then the indexers will access event data pointed to by the reference values in the inverted index to retrieve any further information required at block 756. Subsequently, any further filtering or processing steps are performed on the fields extracted directly from the event data and the results are provided to the user at step 758.

2.13.4. Accelerating Report Generation

In some embodiments, a data server system such as the data intake and query system can accelerate the process of periodically generating updated reports based on query results. To accelerate this process, a summarization engine automatically examines the query to determine whether generation of updated reports can be accelerated by creating intermediate summaries. If reports can be accelerated, the summarization engine periodically generates a summary covering data obtained during a latest non-overlapping time period. For example, where the query seeks events meeting a specified criteria, a summary for the time period includes only events within the time period that meet the specified criteria. Similarly, if the query seeks statistics calculated from the events, such as the number of events that match the specified criteria, then the summary for the time period includes the number of events in the period that match the specified criteria.

In addition to the creation of the summaries, the summarization engine schedules the periodic updating of the report associated with the query. During each scheduled report update, the query engine determines whether intermediate summaries have been generated covering portions of the time period covered by the report update. If so, then the report is generated based on the information contained in the summaries. Also, if additional event data has been received and has not yet been summarized, and is required to generate the complete report, the query can be run on these additional events. Then, the results returned by this query on the additional events, along with the partial results obtained from the intermediate summaries, can be combined to generate the updated report. This process is repeated each time the report is updated. Alternatively, if the system stores events in buckets covering specific time ranges, then the summaries can be generated on a bucket-by-bucket basis. Note that producing intermediate summaries can save the work involved in re-running the query for previous time periods, so advantageously only the newer events needs to be processed while generating an updated report. These report acceleration techniques are described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 8,589,403, entitled “COMPRESSED JOURNALING IN EVENT TRACKING FILES FOR METADATA RECOVERY AND REPLICATION”, issued on 19 Nov. 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 8,412,696, entitled “REAL TIME SEARCHING AND REPORTING”, issued on 2 Apr. 2011, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,589,375 and 8,589,432, both also entitled “REAL TIME SEARCHING AND REPORTING”, both issued on 19 Nov. 2013, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

2.14. Security Features

The data intake and query system provides various schemas, dashboards, and visualizations that simplify developers' tasks to create applications with additional capabilities. One such application is the an enterprise security application, such as SPLUNK® ENTERPRISE SECURITY, which performs monitoring and alerting operations and includes analytics to facilitate identifying both known and unknown security threats based on large volumes of data stored by the data intake and query system. The enterprise security application provides the security practitioner with visibility into security-relevant threats found in the enterprise infrastructure by capturing, monitoring, and reporting on data from enterprise security devices, systems, and applications. Through the use of the data intake and query system searching and reporting capabilities, the enterprise security application provides a top-down and bottom-up view of an organization's security posture.

The enterprise security application leverages the data intake and query system search-time normalization techniques, saved searches, and correlation searches to provide visibility into security-relevant threats and activity and generate notable events for tracking. The enterprise security application enables the security practitioner to investigate and explore the data to find new or unknown threats that do not follow signature-based patterns.

Conventional Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems lack the infrastructure to effectively store and analyze large volumes of security-related data. Traditional SIEM systems typically use fixed schemas to extract data from pre-defined security-related fields at data ingestion time and store the extracted data in a relational database. This traditional data extraction process (and associated reduction in data size) that occurs at data ingestion time inevitably hampers future incident investigations that may need original data to determine the root cause of a security issue, or to detect the onset of an impending security threat.

In contrast, the enterprise security application system stores large volumes of minimally-processed security-related data at ingestion time for later retrieval and analysis at search time when a live security threat is being investigated. To facilitate this data retrieval process, the enterprise security application provides pre-specified schemas for extracting relevant values from the different types of security-related events and enables a user to define such schemas.

The enterprise security application can process many types of security-related information. In general, this security-related information can include any information that can be used to identify security threats. For example, the security-related information can include network-related information, such as IP addresses, domain names, asset identifiers, network traffic volume, uniform resource locator strings, and source addresses. The process of detecting security threats for network-related information is further described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,826,434, entitled “SECURITY THREAT DETECTION BASED ON INDICATIONS IN BIG DATA OF ACCESS TO NEWLY REGISTERED DOMAINS”, issued on 2 Sep. 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 9,215,240, entitled “INVESTIGATIVE AND DYNAMIC DETECTION OF POTENTIAL SECURITY-THREAT INDICATORS FROM EVENTS IN BIG DATA”, issued on 15 Dec. 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,173,801, entitled “GRAPHIC DISPLAY OF SECURITY THREATS BASED ON INDICATIONS OF ACCESS TO NEWLY REGISTERED DOMAINS”, issued on 3 Nov. 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,248,068, entitled “SECURITY THREAT DETECTION OF NEWLY REGISTERED DOMAINS”, issued on 2 Feb. 2016, U.S. Pat. No. 9,426,172, entitled “SECURITY THREAT DETECTION USING DOMAIN NAME ACCESSES”, issued on 23 Aug. 2016, and U.S. Pat. No. 9,432,396, entitled “SECURITY THREAT DETECTION USING DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATIONS”, issued on 30 Aug. 2016, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes. Security-related information can also include malware infection data and system configuration information, as well as access control information, such as login/logout information and access failure notifications. The security-related information can originate from various sources within a data center, such as hosts, virtual machines, storage devices and sensors. The security-related information can also originate from various sources in a network, such as routers, switches, email servers, proxy servers, gateways, firewalls and intrusion-detection systems.

During operation, the enterprise security application facilitates detecting “notable events” that are likely to indicate a security threat. A notable event represents one or more anomalous incidents, the occurrence of which can be identified based on one or more events (e.g., time stamped portions of raw machine data) fulfilling pre-specified and/or dynamically-determined (e.g., based on machine-learning) criteria defined for that notable event. Examples of notable events include the repeated occurrence of an abnormal spike in network usage over a period of time, a single occurrence of unauthorized access to system, a host communicating with a server on a known threat list, and the like. These notable events can be detected in a number of ways, such as: (1) a user can notice a correlation in events and can manually identify that a corresponding group of one or more events amounts to a notable event; or (2) a user can define a “correlation search” specifying criteria for a notable event, and every time one or more events satisfy the criteria, the application can indicate that the one or more events correspond to a notable event; and the like. A user can alternatively select a pre-defined correlation search provided by the application. Note that correlation searches can be run continuously or at regular intervals (e.g., every hour) to search for notable events. Upon detection, notable events can be stored in a dedicated “notable events index,” which can be subsequently accessed to generate various visualizations containing security-related information. Also, alerts can be generated to notify system operators when important notable events are discovered.

The enterprise security application provides various visualizations to aid in discovering security threats, such as a “key indicators view” that enables a user to view security metrics, such as counts of different types of notable events. For example, FIG. 17A illustrates an example key indicators view 1700 that comprises a dashboard, which can display a value 1701, for various security-related metrics, such as malware infections 1702. It can also display a change in a metric value 1703, which indicates that the number of malware infections increased by 63 during the preceding interval. Key indicators view 1700 additionally displays a histogram panel 1704 that displays a histogram of notable events organized by urgency values, and a histogram of notable events organized by time intervals. This key indicators view is described in further detail in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/956,338, entitled “KEY INDICATORS VIEW”, filed on 31 Jul. 2013, and which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

These visualizations can also include an “incident review dashboard” that enables a user to view and act on “notable events.” These notable events can include: (1) a single event of high importance, such as any activity from a known web attacker; or (2) multiple events that collectively warrant review, such as a large number of authentication failures on a host followed by a successful authentication. For example, FIG. 17B illustrates an example incident review dashboard 1710 that includes a set of incident attribute fields 1711 that, for example, enables a user to specify a time range field 1712 for the displayed events. It also includes a timeline 1713 that graphically illustrates the number of incidents that occurred in time intervals over the selected time range. It additionally displays an events list 1714 that enables a user to view a list of all of the notable events that match the criteria in the incident attributes fields 1711. To facilitate identifying patterns among the notable events, each notable event can be associated with an urgency value (e.g., low, medium, high, critical), which is indicated in the incident review dashboard. The urgency value for a detected event can be determined based on the severity of the event and the priority of the system component associated with the event.

2.15. Data Center Monitoring

As mentioned above, the data intake and query platform provides various features that simplify the developer's task to create various applications. One such application is a virtual machine monitoring application, such as SPLUNK® APP FOR VMWARE® that provides operational visibility into granular performance metrics, logs, tasks and events, and topology from hosts, virtual machines and virtual centers. It empowers administrators with an accurate real-time picture of the health of the environment, proactively identifying performance and capacity bottlenecks.

Conventional data-center-monitoring systems lack the infrastructure to effectively store and analyze large volumes of machine-generated data, such as performance information and log data obtained from the data center. In conventional data-center-monitoring systems, machine-generated data is typically pre-processed prior to being stored, for example, by extracting pre-specified data items and storing them in a database to facilitate subsequent retrieval and analysis at search time. However, the rest of the data is not saved and discarded during pre-processing.

In contrast, the virtual machine monitoring application stores large volumes of minimally processed machine data, such as performance information and log data, at ingestion time for later retrieval and analysis at search time when a live performance issue is being investigated. In addition to data obtained from various log files, this performance-related information can include values for performance metrics obtained through an application programming interface (API) provided as part of the vSphere Hypervisor™ system distributed by VMware, Inc. of Palo Alto, Calif. For example, these performance metrics can include: (1) CPU-related performance metrics; (2) disk-related performance metrics; (3) memory-related performance metrics; (4) network-related performance metrics; (5) energy-usage statistics; (6) data-traffic-related performance metrics; (7) overall system availability performance metrics; (8) cluster-related performance metrics; and (9) virtual machine performance statistics. Such performance metrics are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/167,316, entitled “CORRELATION FOR USER-SELECTED TIME RANGES OF VALUES FOR PERFORMANCE METRICS OF COMPONENTS IN AN INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENT WITH LOG DATA FROM THAT INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENT”, filed on 29 Jan. 2014, and which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

To facilitate retrieving information of interest from performance data and log files, the virtual machine monitoring application provides pre-specified schemas for extracting relevant values from different types of performance-related events, and also enables a user to define such schemas.

The virtual machine monitoring application additionally provides various visualizations to facilitate detecting and diagnosing the root cause of performance problems. For example, one such visualization is a “proactive monitoring tree” that enables a user to easily view and understand relationships among various factors that affect the performance of a hierarchically structured computing system. This proactive monitoring tree enables a user to easily navigate the hierarchy by selectively expanding nodes representing various entities (e.g., virtual centers or computing clusters) to view performance information for lower-level nodes associated with lower-level entities (e.g., virtual machines or host systems). Example node-expansion operations are illustrated in FIG. 17C, wherein nodes 1733 and 1734 are selectively expanded. Note that nodes 1731-1739 can be displayed using different patterns or colors to represent different performance states, such as a critical state, a warning state, a normal state or an unknown/offline state. The ease of navigation provided by selective expansion in combination with the associated performance-state information enables a user to quickly diagnose the root cause of a performance problem. The proactive monitoring tree is described in further detail in U.S. Pat. No. 9,185,007, entitled “PROACTIVE MONITORING TREE WITH SEVERITY STATE SORTING”, issued on 10 Nov. 2015, and U.S. Pat. No. 9,426,045, also entitled “PROACTIVE MONITORING TREE WITH SEVERITY STATE SORTING”, issued on 23 Aug. 2016, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

The virtual machine monitoring application also provides a user interface that enables a user to select a specific time range and then view heterogeneous data comprising events, log data, and associated performance metrics for the selected time range. For example, the screen illustrated in FIG. 17D displays a listing of recent “tasks and events” and a listing of recent “log entries” for a selected time range above a performance-metric graph for “average CPU core utilization” for the selected time range. Note that a user is able to operate pull-down menus 1742 to selectively display different performance metric graphs for the selected time range. This enables the user to correlate trends in the performance-metric graph with corresponding event and log data to quickly determine the root cause of a performance problem. This user interface is described in more detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/167,316, entitled “CORRELATION FOR USER-SELECTED TIME RANGES OF VALUES FOR PERFORMANCE METRICS OF COMPONENTS IN AN INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENT WITH LOG DATA FROM THAT INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENT”, filed on 29 Jan. 2014, and which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

2.16. IT Service Monitoring

As previously mentioned, the data intake and query platform provides various schemas, dashboards and visualizations that make it easy for developers to create applications to provide additional capabilities. One such application is an IT monitoring application, such as SPLUNK® IT SERVICE INTELLIGENCE™, which performs monitoring and alerting operations. The IT monitoring application also includes analytics to help an analyst diagnose the root cause of performance problems based on large volumes of data stored by the data intake and query system as correlated to the various services an IT organization provides (a service-centric view). This differs significantly from conventional IT monitoring systems that lack the infrastructure to effectively store and analyze large volumes of service-related events. Traditional service monitoring systems typically use fixed schemas to extract data from pre-defined fields at data ingestion time, wherein the extracted data is typically stored in a relational database. This data extraction process and associated reduction in data content that occurs at data ingestion time inevitably hampers future investigations, when all of the original data may be needed to determine the root cause of or contributing factors to a service issue.

In contrast, an IT monitoring application system stores large volumes of minimally-processed service-related data at ingestion time for later retrieval and analysis at search time, to perform regular monitoring, or to investigate a service issue. To facilitate this data retrieval process, the IT monitoring application enables a user to define an IT operations infrastructure from the perspective of the services it provides. In this service-centric approach, a service such as corporate e-mail may be defined in terms of the entities employed to provide the service, such as host machines and network devices. Each entity is defined to include information for identifying all of the events that pertains to the entity, whether produced by the entity itself or by another machine, and considering the many various ways the entity may be identified in machine data (such as by a URL, an IP address, or machine name). The service and entity definitions can organize events around a service so that all of the events pertaining to that service can be easily identified. This capability provides a foundation for the implementation of Key Performance Indicators.

One or more Key Performance Indicators (KPI's) are defined for a service within the IT monitoring application. Each KPI measures an aspect of service performance at a point in time or over a period of time (aspect KPI's). Each KPI is defined by a search query that derives a KPI value from the machine data of events associated with the entities that provide the service. Information in the entity definitions may be used to identify the appropriate events at the time a KPI is defined or whenever a KPI value is being determined. The KPI values derived over time may be stored to build a valuable repository of current and historical performance information for the service, and the repository, itself, may be subject to search query processing. Aggregate KPIs may be defined to provide a measure of service performance calculated from a set of service aspect KPI values; this aggregate may even be taken across defined timeframes and/or across multiple services. A particular service may have an aggregate KPI derived from substantially all of the aspect KPI's of the service to indicate an overall health score for the service.

The IT monitoring application facilitates the production of meaningful aggregate KPI's through a system of KPI thresholds and state values. Different KPI definitions may produce values in different ranges, and so the same value may mean something very different from one KPI definition to another. To address this, the IT monitoring application implements a translation of individual KPI values to a common domain of “state” values. For example, a KPI range of values may be 1-100, or 50-275, while values in the state domain may be ‘critical,’ ‘warning,’ ‘normal,’ and ‘informational’. Thresholds associated with a particular KPI definition determine ranges of values for that KPI that correspond to the various state values. In one case, KPI values 95-100 may be set to correspond to ‘critical’ in the state domain. KPI values from disparate KPI's can be processed uniformly once they are translated into the common state values using the thresholds. For example, “normal 80% of the time” can be applied across various KPI's. To provide meaningful aggregate KPI's, a weighting value can be assigned to each KPI so that its influence on the calculated aggregate KPI value is increased or decreased relative to the other KPI's.

One service in an IT environment often impacts, or is impacted by, another service. The IT monitoring application can reflect these dependencies. For example, a dependency relationship between a corporate e-mail service and a centralized authentication service can be reflected by recording an association between their respective service definitions. The recorded associations establish a service dependency topology that informs the data or selection options presented in a GUI, for example. (The service dependency topology is like a “map” showing how services are connected based on their dependencies.) The service topology may itself be depicted in a GUI and may be interactive to allow navigation among related services.

Entity definitions in the IT monitoring application can include informational fields that can serve as metadata, implied data fields, or attributed data fields for the events identified by other aspects of the entity definition. Entity definitions in the IT monitoring application can also be created and updated by an import of tabular data (as represented in a CSV, another delimited file, or a search query result set). The import may be GUI-mediated or processed using import parameters from a GUI-based import definition process. Entity definitions in the IT monitoring application can also be associated with a service by means of a service definition rule. Processing the rule results in the matching entity definitions being associated with the service definition. The rule can be processed at creation time, and thereafter on a scheduled or on-demand basis. This allows dynamic, rule-based updates to the service definition.

During operation, the IT monitoring application can recognize notable events that may indicate a service performance problem or other situation of interest. These notable events can be recognized by a “correlation search” specifying trigger criteria for a notable event: every time KPI values satisfy the criteria, the application indicates a notable event. A severity level for the notable event may also be specified. Furthermore, when trigger criteria are satisfied, the correlation search may additionally or alternatively cause a service ticket to be created in an IT service management (ITSM) system, such as a systems available from ServiceNow, Inc., of Santa Clara, Calif.

SPLUNK® IT SERVICE INTELLIGENCE™ provides various visualizations built on its service-centric organization of events and the KPI values generated and collected. Visualizations can be particularly useful for monitoring or investigating service performance. The IT monitoring application provides a service monitoring interface suitable as the home page for ongoing IT service monitoring. The interface is appropriate for settings such as desktop use or for a wall-mounted display in a network operations center (NOC). The interface may prominently display a services health section with tiles for the aggregate KPI's indicating overall health for defined services and a general KPI section with tiles for KPI's related to individual service aspects. These tiles may display KPI information in a variety of ways, such as by being colored and ordered according to factors like the KPI state value. They also can be interactive and navigate to visualizations of more detailed KPI information.

The IT monitoring application provides a service-monitoring dashboard visualization based on a user-defined template. The template can include user-selectable widgets of varying types and styles to display KPI information. The content and the appearance of widgets can respond dynamically to changing KPI information. The KPI widgets can appear in conjunction with a background image, user drawing objects, or other visual elements, that depict the IT operations environment, for example. The KPI widgets or other GUI elements can be interactive so as to provide navigation to visualizations of more detailed KPI information.

The IT monitoring application provides a visualization showing detailed time-series information for multiple KPI's in parallel graph lanes. The length of each lane can correspond to a uniform time range, while the width of each lane may be automatically adjusted to fit the displayed KPI data. Data within each lane may be displayed in a user selectable style, such as a line, area, or bar chart. During operation a user may select a position in the time range of the graph lanes to activate lane inspection at that point in time. Lane inspection may display an indicator for the selected time across the graph lanes and display the KPI value associated with that point in time for each of the graph lanes. The visualization may also provide navigation to an interface for defining a correlation search, using information from the visualization to pre-populate the definition.

The IT monitoring application provides a visualization for incident review showing detailed information for notable events. The incident review visualization may also show summary information for the notable events over a time frame, such as an indication of the number of notable events at each of a number of severity levels. The severity level display may be presented as a rainbow chart with the warmest color associated with the highest severity classification. The incident review visualization may also show summary information for the notable events over a time frame, such as the number of notable events occurring within segments of the time frame. The incident review visualization may display a list of notable events within the time frame ordered by any number of factors, such as time or severity. The selection of a particular notable event from the list may display detailed information about that notable event, including an identification of the correlation search that generated the notable event.

The IT monitoring application provides pre-specified schemas for extracting relevant values from the different types of service-related events. It also enables a user to define such schemas.

2.17. Multi-Tier Architecture

An architecture supporting multi-tier deployment may be advantageous in focusing the resources of an enterprise. An enterprise may have different system users, or groups of users, at different locations, with different roles and responsibilities. A multi-tier architecture may permit effective and efficient deployment of data input and query system (DIQS) instances with user-appropriate applications. DIQS instances supporting lower-tier, focused, work group oriented applications, for example, may be tailored to meet the specific needs of the associated application(s). Such tailoring may reduce installation size and operating burden both in terms of computing resources, space resources, and administrative overhead. Further DIQS instances for lower-tiers may be tightly packaged with a related lower-tier application, such that each is preconfigured for integrated operation with the other in an optimal way. Such integrated instances may all but eliminate administrative requirements for deployment that are not site-dependent.

Such lower-tier deployments may have interfaces to higher-tier deployments to reduce duplications of computing and human effort, to share functionality across the boundary, and to interoperate to provide feature integrations, for example. An illustrative example may be helpful. In the example, an enterprise may have deployed a lower-tier Entity Monitor application (EMA) that provides entity monitoring to a local workgroup of users tasked with the reliable operation of a bank of server racks. That same enterprise may have deployed a higher-tier service monitoring system (SMS) application that is used by the staff of a networks operation center to monitor major services provided by the enterprise information technology (IT) environment. (SPLUNK® IT SERVICE INTELLIGENCE™ is an example of such an SMS.) Enterprise email and customer-facing web page delivery may be examples of such services, and the services are performed by entities such as the servers in the racks monitored by the EMA. In the example enterprise, the deployed EMA may maintain a collection of entity definitions having information about the server entities, and the EMA may perform analytics against machine data pertaining to the entities a produce valuable metrics or representations reflective of the entities. Similarly, the deployed SMS may maintain its own collection of entity definitions having information about a broad set of entities including the server entities, and the SMS may perform analytics against machine data pertaining to the entities and produce valuable metrics or representations reflective of the entities in a broader context, such as the importance of an entity to maintaining the operation of a critical system service. The EMA and the SMS each has information the other does not, and may not be able to produce on its own, regarding an overlapping set of entities. Interfaces enable synergistic operational combinations.

In an embodiment, the lower-tier applications and the higher-tier applications interface to provide: one or more of mapped groupings of entities to the higher-tier services, both automatically and manually, business-level metrics which can be tied to data from the lower-tier application to create an end-to-end analysis of infrastructure impact on business outcomes; multiple lower-tier application instances together with other tools and custom data in the higher-tier application; identification of anomalous entities in the higher-tier application for correlation across the enterprise, improved interface at the higher-tier application for management of entities, and end to end navigation for monitoring and troubleshooting issues (service to entity).

In an embodiment, lower-tier monitoring applications integrate natively with the higher-tier application to provide one or more entity sharing, transition from services to entity metrics analysis, management and actions on alerts from entities in a Notable Events framework, and application of advanced machine language available in the higher-level monitoring application to entities for clustering and reliability forecasting.

Users, such as system administrators and site reliability engineers, for example, are tasked with maintaining the overall health, availability, reliability and performance of one or more entities within an enterprise system in an information technology (IT) environment. Each entity may be a computing device, a virtual computing device, a group of computing devices or a group of virtual computing devices at a specific site or multiple sites within the enterprise system. Typically, these users monitor approximately entities of 800 to 1,000 computing devices.

Lower-tier applications, programs, or solutions of an event-based data intake and query system provide an analytics driven tool for infrastructure monitoring and troubleshooting of the entities that represent a subset of the enterprise system. While a higher-tier application of an event-based data intake and query system, such as the SPLUNK® ENTERPRISE system developed by Splunk Inc. of San Francisco, Calif. can analyze machine data across the enterprise system, the lower-tier application searches the machine data from the entities and provides entity-level metrics related to the performance of the selected entities with the enterprise system.

Embodiments of the lower-tier application are directed to monitoring performance of an entity at an entity-level using key performance indicators derived from machine data from the entity. Implementations of the lower-tier application provide users with metrics related to the performance of a monitored entity within an enterprise system in an information technology environment. The lower-tier-tier application allows users to monitor entities from a bottom-up perspective and provide visualization to trouble shoot entity related issues.

In an embodiment, lower-tier applications provide an analytic-driven IT operations tool that unifies metrics and logs for trouble shooting and monitoring hybrid IT infrastructure.

In a further embodiment, the lower-tier applications are single team focused and provide simple tagging and grouping, reliability scoring on entities and groups anomaly detection and adaptive thresholding for easy tuning; 24 hours of alerts and notifications with ability to mute alerts; metrics analysis workspace built into product; in-application collection guidance; self-service, and easy deployment.

In an embodiment, the lower-tier applications and the higher-tier applications interface to provide one or more of map groupings of entities to the higher-tier services, both automatically and manually, business-level metrics which can be tied to data from the lower-tier application to create an end to end analysis of infrastructure impact on business outcomes; multiple lower-tier application instances together with other tools and custom data in the higher-tier application; identification of anomalous entities in the higher-tier application for correlation across the enterprise, improved interface at the higher-tier application for management of entities, and end to end navigation for monitoring and troubleshooting issues (service to entity).

In an embodiment, lower-tier monitoring applications integrate natively with the higher-tier application to provide one or more entity sharing, transition from services to entity metrics analysis, management and actions on alerts from entities in a Notable Events framework, and application of advanced machine language available in the higher-level monitoring application to entities for clustering and reliability forecasting.

In some embodiments, the lower-tier application does not permit clustering. Further, the user is not permitted to write applications that use the search engine, but is provided with graphic user interfaces for visualization of the entity-level metrics. The lower-tier applications comprise a single use, single channel solution.

Lower-tier applications may generally be considered to have more focused functionality than a higher-tiered application. Accordingly, a data input and query system (DIQS) with the functionality to sustain a higher-tiered application has no difficulty sustaining a lower-tiered application. However, it may be advantageous for a DIQS deployment strictly supporting a lower-tier application, or applications, to have no more complexity than what is required to support those lower-tier applications. Such a tailoring of the DIQS may simplify deployment, and reduce ongoing administration and overhead and operational costs.

FIG. 18 shows a block diagram of an example of a data intake and query system 108 that supports the application level functionality of a lower-tier application in one embodiment. FIG. 18 represents an adaptation of the data input and query system 108 of FIG. 4 and like elements have common numbering as between the two figures, and the descriptions thereof are not repeated here. Notable differences for the example embodiment illustrated in FIG. 18 are described now. Client devices 404 a, 404 b, and 404 n, of FIG. 4 are replaced in FIG. 18 by lower tier application 401 which acts as the client in relation to the underlying data input and query system (DIQS) 108. High functionality, direct user access to the underlying DIQS may generally not be provided. The DIQS may be adapted, supplied, configured, and provisioned to effect support for requests presented by the lower tier application, in an embodiment. As one example, DIQS 108 of FIG. 18 may exclude support for External Result Provider (ERP) processing as indicated by the dashed lines around and connecting ERP processes 412, RDBMS ERP 416, and Hadoop ERP 414. In one embodiment, a developer or provider of the lower-tier application may configure the DIQS functionality to only include what is required by the lower-tier application, perhaps through a user interface directed to building a customized DIQS configuration instance. In one embodiment, a customized DIQS instance may be able to be shared by a number of lower-tier applications such as 401.

In comparison to the DIQS 108 of FIG. 4, the DIQS 108 of FIG. 18 is shown to also include indexer instance 436 having data store 438. Indexer 436 and data store 438 operate just as described for indexers 206 and data stores 208 of FIG. 4—and any indexer 208 and data store 208 may comport with the details next described for indexer 436 and data store 438 of FIG. 18. Indexer 436 of FIG. 18 when processing the data of its associated data store 438 may distinguish and discriminate between different types or classes of data in its data store. Data store 438 is shown to include Event Data 430 a storing data of an event data type and Metric Data 430 b of metric data type. Event type data is already described in detail elsewhere in this written description. Metric type data may be data that is characteristically small per occurrence, high in volume, primarily numeric, and perhaps highly structured. An example of data with those characteristics may be performance or parameter measurements being constantly reported by networked devices such as computing machines in information technology environments, automated machinery on the shop floor of a factory, or sensors on the windmills of an energy farm. An indexer such as 436 having multiple data type capability may use functional processing specialized to the data type when responding to requests from search head 210 or receiving data from a forwarder 204. For example, indexer 436 may use different processing to effect the formatting, storage, indexing, retrieval, consolidation, aggregation, and such, of metric type data than it does for event type data in order to maximize or optimize the processing of each type of data to improve overall DIQS performance and functionality. Lower tier application 401 may invoke the processing of DIQS 108 for multiple types of data and, in one embodiment, the types of data supported by the indexers (206, 436) may be configurable for an instance of DIQS 108 customized to the lower tier application. These and other embodiments are possible.

Embodiments of the higher-tier application are directed to monitoring performance of a system at a service-level using key performance indicators derived from machine language. Implementations of the higher-tier application provide users with metrics related to the performance of a monitored service, such as services pertaining to an information technology environment. The higher-tier application allows users to monitor services from a top-down perspective and provide through customizable graphic user interfaces visualization to trouble shoot service related issues. Higher-tier applications permit clustering and users are permitted to create customer applications that use the search engine.

One example of a higher-tier application is an IT monitoring application, such as SPLUNK® IT SERVICE INTELLIGENCE™, which performs monitoring and alerting operations. Appendix A includes U.S. Patent Publication No. US2017/0147681A1, entitled “Portable Control Modules in a Machine Data Driven Service Monitoring System, filed on Jan. 9, 2017, which provides robust description of the IT SERVICE INTELLIGENCE™ higher-tier application.

3.0. Triage Model Processing for Notable or Alert Events

Applications as already discussed, such as the SPLUNK® IT SERVICE INTELLIGENCE™ and SPLUNK® ENTERPRISE SECURITY, implement systems that perform monitoring and alerting for a targeted system or environment. The growing complexity of such monitored systems or environments, the rapid expansion of the volume of machine data such environments are capable of generating, and the growing effectiveness and sophistication of the technologies employed by the monitoring systems to ferret out impending or actual alert conditions, can lead to an overwhelming volume of alert information. The voluminous alert information produced by an implementation may also cross spectrums of urgency, severity, importance, purpose, and other characteristics. Accordingly, identifying and appropriately surfacing alert information representing the most important conditions to address or correct is an increasingly difficult job but one of growing significance. Such triaging may bear the same degree of importance here as it does in a medical context. Downtime, decreased functionality, and impacted performance experienced by a monitored environment can be expensive in monetary terms to its owner, in terms of consumed or wasted computing resources, in terms of lost opportunity, in terms of downstream impacts resulting from system failure or subpar performance, and in other terms. Inventive aspects next described may be implemented in the context of a monitoring system to overcome substantial hurdles to efficiently, effectively, and automatically identify, surface, address, remedy, and dispatch the most important alerts and any operational conditions of the monitored system represented thereby. In an embodiment, relevant alert information may be referred to and represented as notable event information, incident information, critical alert information, or otherwise designated information. An understanding of inventive aspects and the types, classes, categories, or designations of information which, in respect of, they can be advantageously practiced will become apparent to one of skill and art by consideration of the illustrated figures and the descriptions that follow.

FIG. 19 depicts a system diagram of an operating environment including a notable event processing system in one embodiment. Operating environment 1900 is shown to include monitored system/environment 1910, source machine data 1912, notable event generator/source 1916, and greater notable event processing system 1920. Greater notable event processing system 1920 is shown to include data intake and query system (DIQS) 108, collected machine data store 1922, monitoring system 1930, monitoring data store including notable events 1932, notable event processing system (NEPS) 1940, and NEPS data store 1942. Greater notable event processing system 1920 indicates for this example embodiment that DIQS 108, monitoring system 1930, and NEPS 1940 may execute in closely integrated fashion such as where the data intake and query system 108 not only provides for the collection, representation, and search processing of machine data, but also provides an operating platform for applications utilizing its capabilities such as monitoring system 1930 and NEPS 1940. Embodiments may vary as to the degree and mechanisms of integration among constituent components without departing from inventive aspects taught herein.

Monitored system/environment 1910 represents a system or environment in operation having electronic or other technologies that produce data reflecting its operation. Monitored system 1910 may be a commercial, industrial, residential, or other system. Examples of such monitored systems may include information technology (IT) systems of an enterprise, a network of automated and/or sensor-equipped machinery on a factory floor, a chemical processing plant, or a refinery, a deployed field of wind turbines, or a home security system, to name a few. During the course of operation of any such monitored system/environment 1910, components of or ancillary to the environment may produce machine data reflecting its states, conditions, measurements, or the like. Such machine data 1912 is conveyed to data intake and query system 108 in one embodiment. Data intake and query system (DIQS) 108 may process the machine data 1912 as described elsewhere in the contents of this application to produce, maintain, and make searchable a data store having the collected machine data and possibly derivations thereof 1922. Monitoring system 1930 in one embodiment may invoke functionality of DIQS 108, perhaps by an application programming interface (API), to query the store of collected machine data 1922 in order to extract or derive information useful to characterize past, present, and predicted performance of various aspects or components of monitored system 1910 including, for example, key performance indicators (KPIs). Meaningful results of monitoring system 1930 operation may be reflected in a data store of monitoring data 1932, perhaps persistently.

In an embodiment, monitoring system 1930 may implement processing functions to identify certain conditions as notable events with respect to the monitored system 1910. A condition or event may be identified as a notable event by satisfying criteria indicating a superior degree of immediate or future usefulness in performing monitoring system functions as compared with the majority of, the substantial majority of, or substantially all of, the conditions or events discernible for the monitored system from the collected machine data. In an embodiment, a notable event may directly correspond to a single event or metric entry of the machine data. In an embodiment, a notable event may correspond to a recognized pattern among multiple event, metric, or other entries of the machine data. Many embodiments are possible for recognizing events or conditions from machine data of increased importance to achieving monitoring system processing objectives. In an embodiment, a notable event may be recognized and recorded to reflect a condition requiring urgent attention such as the failure of a critical component. In an embodiment, a notable event may be recognized and recorded to reflect meaningful but nonurgent descriptive information for a system state or summary perhaps most useful in the future to reflect historical system operation. Accordingly, the collection of notable events found in monitoring data store 1932 as produced by monitoring system 1930 may include notable events having a variety of purposes, importances, urgencies, relevances, and such as may be ascribed to them.

In one embodiment, notable event processing system (NEPS) 1940, which may be a subsystem or component of monitoring system 1930 in an embodiment, may provide processing to improve the effective use of the notable event data of data store 1932. In one embodiment, NEPS 1940 may implement processing to recognize or discriminate between and among the variety of purposes, importances, urgencies, relevances, and such of notable events to direct and condition their processing. In one embodiment, for example, NEPS 1940 may include processing that identifies notable events representing an urgent condition that may be automatically correctable, and processes those events according to their urgency by invoking a corresponding automatic action for each. In one embodiment, for example, NEPS 1940 may include processing to visualize notable event data of 1932 in a user interface where aspects of the visualization are determined by characteristics, properties, dimensions, or the like ascribed to them, possibly to indicate a purpose, importance, urgency, relevance, or the like. Many embodiments are possible. The processing of NEPS 1940 may create new information that may be reflected in NEPS data store 1942. Such information may include new information that is relevant to a particular notable event instance and which may be combined in some fashion with information of the particular notable event instance to produce an enhanced record of the instance for improved downstream processing. Information of such an enhanced record may include an indication of a dispositive automatic action taken to resolve an error condition associated with the particular notable event instance to divert the instance in the future from repeatedly consuming expensive, high-priority processing resources better allocated to other unresolved, urgent notable events.

Collected machine data 1922, monitoring data 1932, and NEPS data 1942 are illustrated as logically distinct data stores for purposes of illustration. One of skill appreciates that the data stores may be embodied with variety in underlying physical, logical, functional, platform mechanisms, or the like, and with variety in any degree of integration between or among them. For example, data stores 1922, 1932, 1942 may all be implemented with functionality of data intake and query system 108, exposing the data of each for use via query mechanisms of DIQS 108. Many embodiments are possible.

Similarly, while the foregoing discussion described machine data of a DIQS being processed by a monitoring system to produce notable events which are in turn processed by a notable event processing system to produce an enhanced notable event representation, for example, notable event instances may arise through other avenues. Notable event generator/source 1916 of FIG. 19 represents one or more systems or components, external to notable event processing system 1940/1920, that supply information instances that may be immediately processable or recognizable as notable event instances. Notable event generator/source 1916 is illustrated as able to inject such information instances into the environment 1900 of FIG. 19 as (i) machine data 1912 for monitored system/environment 1910 subject to the ingestion processing of DIQS 108, as (ii) independent input data to DIQS 108 for collection, storage, search, as (iii) input data to monitoring system 1930 for inclusion among its notable event data of 1932, and or as (iv) directed notable event input data to NEPS 1940 for subjection to its notable event management processing. In one example, monitored system/environment 1910 may include notable event generator/source 1916 functionality. Many embodiments are possible.

An example of a monitoring system capable of producing notable events for which notable event management processing such as described here may be desired is the aforementioned SPLUNK® IT SERVICE INTELLIGENCE™. One of skill may further consider example embodiments for notable event creation and use as represented in U.S. Pat. No. 9,294,361, entitled “Monitoring Service-Level Performance Using a Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Correlation Search,” issued on Mar. 22, 2016, and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2017-0046374 A1, entitled “Automatic Event Group Action Interface,” published Feb. 16, 2017, in respect of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 15/276,750, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all valid purposes.

FIG. 20 depicts a system diagram illustrating computing resources and processes implementing multiple phases of notable event processing in one embodiment. System 2000 is shown to include data sources 102, networks 104, DIQS 108, data resources data store 2010, notable event stream 2028 models data store 2050, action message 2072, action target 2070, modeler interface apparatus 2002, user interface apparatus 2004, and related processing including model-based inbound notable event processing 2060. Data resources data store 2010 is shown to have a number of components including machine data 2012, original notable events data 2014, notable event post-creation data 2016, notable event paradata 2018, environmental data 2020, command configuration and control (CCC) data 2022 other data 2024, and enhanced notable event data 2026. Models data store 2050 is shown to include score model template data 2052, score model instance data 2054, action model template data 2056, and action model instance data 2058.

In an embodiment, the illustrated components of data resources 2010 of FIG. 20 may be generally described as follows. Machine data 2012 may represent the machine data from monitored system or environment ingested by DIQS 108 and stored and made searchable. Notable events data 2014 may represent a collection of notable event instances as first produced, identified, or recognized, for example, by a monitoring system such as 1930 of FIG. 19, and as reflected in a data store such as 1932 of FIG. 19. Notable event post-creation data 2016 of FIG. 20 may represent information about particular notable events or their processing arising after notable event creation. In an embodiment such information may include workflow telemetry information about the status or position of the notable event in a notable event processing workflow, and/or a record or history of transactions or processing performed in regards to the notable event including, for example, those involving user interface events. User interface event information may include, for example, information about whether a user clicked on an event and the actions initiated or indicated by the user with respect to the event. In an embodiment, such information may include other notable event-related data such as information reflecting the membership of a notable event in a notable event group, a the position of a notable on a display to the user, and perhaps its relative position, and many others. Embodiments may vary as to the items of notable event post-creation data in computer storage. In an embodiment, items, copies, or aggregations of notable event post-creation data may share the characteristic of arising from the existence of the notable event and/or existing because of the notable event. Notable event paradata 2018 may represent additional information that in contrast, in an embodiment, may likely exist independently of the existence of the notable event instance, yet may be correlated to the notable event instance, perhaps as useful in making a determination, particularly a modeled determination, to somehow characterize or score the notable event or identify future processing related to it. In one embodiment, paradata for a particular notable event may include information regarding other notable events that are members of a same notable event group. In one embodiment, paradata for a particular notable event may include a list of identified on-duty support personnel qualified to facilitate a subsequent step of workflow processing anticipated for the notable event instance, for example. In an embodiment, paradata for a particular notable event may include system status information such as an identification and/or quantification of other workloads running at the time, resource utilization, and such. In an embodiment, paradata for a particular notable event may include certain information of, related to, or similar to enhanced notable event-type data for one or more other notable event instances that may be determined to be similar to the current notable event instance by some measure of similarity, or summations or other representations including such. Notable event instances in an embodiment may be determined to be similar based on notable-event type, time-of-day information, calendar time information, and/or any other factors. In one embodiment, information for similar notable event instances included somehow as paradata of the current instance may include information about actions taken, action performers, outcomes, and resolution time, for example. Environmental data 2020 may represent static or dynamic information describing past, present, or predicted components, participants, or conditions of monitored environment 1910. In an embodiment, environmental data 2020 may not require any specific correlation to a particular notable event instance because of its general applicability, for example. Examples of environmental data may include equipment identifications and specifications; software version or revision information; location and facilities information, personnel information including identification, schedules, qualifications, and contact information; and any and all others.

Command configuration and control (CCC) data 2022 may represent information that directs, controls, determines, or the like, operational processing performed by a lesser or greater NEPS such as represented by 1940 and 1920 of FIG. 19. In a sense, CCC data store 2022 of FIG. 20 in combination with the hardware and/or software that accesses information of CCC 2022 to condition processing operations, and hardware and/or software that provides an interface for establishing and/or maintaining the contents of CCC data store 2022, operates as the control panel for the NEPS where a traditional control panel of a simpler system or appliance with all its knobs, buttons, switches, lights, LEDs, gauges, numeric displays, and the like, cannot suffice. In one embodiment, hardware and/or software that provides an interface for establishing and/or maintaining the contents of CCC data store 2022 (not distinctly shown) may include graphical user interfaces (GUIs) to visualize certain contents of CCC data store 2022 and provide interactive elements enabling a user to add or change the content of data store 2022. In one embodiment, a RESTful interface may be employed. In one embodiment, a graphical user interface may include depictions of physical buttons, gauges, indicators, and the like, to display CCC data and effect its change. Other information 2024 may represent any and all other information as may be useful to deliver a desired system though not specifically described and discussed, and illustrates the non-limiting nature of the example system 2000 of FIG. 20.

Enhanced notable event data 2026 may represent information in an embodiment that extends beyond information of the original notable event instance to include additional, related information surrounding the notable event and its processing, as may be useful, for example, for applying triage models and/or directing future workflow processing for a notable event instance. In the embodiment illustrated by system 2000 of FIG. 20, enhanced notable event data 2026 is shown to be produced by the processing of block 2030. At block 2030, processing may be performed to determine enhanced notable event data for corresponding notable event instances. The processing of block 2030 may reasonably use information of any of the components illustrated for data resources 2010 to produce a new or updated instance of enhanced notable event data in an enhanced notable event data store 2026. In an embodiment, the processing of block 2030, as well as other processing depicted and described in relation to system 2000 of FIG. 20 generally, may be controlled or conditioned based on information included and command configuration and control data 2022. In an embodiment such as depicted by system 2000 that implements triaging processing for notable events, the processing of block 2030 may be denominated as a Phase 1, or “watch” phase, of intelligent notable event triaging. In an embodiment, the processing of block 2030 may operate asynchronously of other triaging processing and may operate on a relatively continuous basis. In one embodiment, the processing of block 2030 may be event driven where the processing receives notification of any add/change/delete events regarding data used to create and/or maintain enhanced notable event data 2026. In one embodiment, the processing of block 2030 may be search or polling driven where, on a continuous or timed basis, the processing queries data sources to identify any add/change/delete events of consequence. Many embodiments are possible. An example instance of enhanced notable event data is described below in reference to FIG. 21.

In an embodiment that implements triaging processing for notable events such as depicted by system 2000, the processing of blocks 2040, 2042, and 2044, may be denominated as a Phase 2, or model construction phase, of intelligent notable event triaging. The example embodiment, as illustrated, includes two types or categories of triage models: score models and action models. Further, the example embodiment, as illustrated, illustrates each model, regardless of type, represented by two components: a model template and a model instance. Other embodiments are possible and one of skill after consideration of the material of this written description will appreciate and understand how to adapt inventive aspects for such an embodiment. For example, an embodiment may consolidate the template and the instance described for the illustrated embodiment into a single entity and adapt the processing accordingly. Many embodiments are possible.

At block 2040, a complete model is constructed and appropriately represented in a model data store such as 2050 of FIG. 20, where it can be accessed and received by subsequent processing in order to direct, control, or condition such processing to effect triage modeling against notable event instances. Processing of block 2040 in an embodiment may include executing development tools functions and processing user interactions therewith to reach a complete model. Model construction in one embodiment is further discussed below in relation to FIG. 22, and illustrative model representations are discussed below in relation to FIGS. 23-26.

In an illustrative example represented by FIG. 20, construction of a complete model by the processing of block 2040 results in creation of both a model template and a corresponding model instance. In such an embodiment, the model template may include one or more substitution variables or value placeholders in its content, and a corresponding model instance may include values to replace the variables or placeholders of the template, the combination of which is sufficient to allow processing of the model against one or more notable events or event groups to produce a model result for the subject events/groups.

In an embodiment, the processing of block 2040 to construct a complete model may result in the creation of a score model template 2052 and a score model instance 2054. Score models of an embodiment may be categorized as such in that each score model perhaps produces a numerical or categorical result that characterizes a subject notable event or group. Score models of an embodiment may be categorized as such in that each score model perhaps produces a result that principally is of informational value, is passive in nature, and/or is principally limited to the scope of internal processing performed by the notable event processing system. Score models may also variously be referred to, herein, as rank models, filter models, and such, as may be suggestive of an intended, likely, or effective use. For example, a score model may be referred to as a rank model where the model result is perhaps a numeric value useful to rank a notable event instance against others on some measure or criteria, in an embodiment. For example, a score model may be referred to as a filter model or the model result is perhaps a numeric or categorical value useful as the target of selection criteria to perform filtering, sorting, subsetting, or similar operations on notable events.

In an embodiment, the processing of block 2040 to construct a complete model may result in the creation of an action model template 2056 and an action model instance 2058. Action models of an embodiment may be categorized as such in that each action model perhaps produces a result indicative of a process action to be performed in regards to the subject notable event. In an embodiment, such a process action may be a particular action or action sequence in an automatic, semiautomatic, manual, or hybrid workflow, predefined by a user. In an embodiment, such a process action may be a particular action or action sequence in an automatic, semiautomatic, manual, or hybrid workflow predefined by the system developer or provider. In an embodiment, such a process action may be unconditionally performed after determination by the model, or conditionally performed. In an embodiment, an action model may perhaps produce a result including multiple process actions. In such an embodiment, the multiple process actions may represent a list of available actions, a list of alternative actions, a list of mutually exclusive actions, and/or combinations of such. In an embodiment, a modeled process action may include attribute, property, or metadata information including, for example, a recommendation indicator, value, or weight, that represents by some measure a degree to which the process action has been modeled to be a recommended action. Many embodiments are possible. Action models of an embodiment may be categorized as such in that each action model perhaps produces a result that principally identifies and action step or sequence. Action models of an embodiment may be categorized as such in that each action model perhaps produces a result that principally identifies and action step or sequence that may be invoked or executed in whole or in part by the internal processing performed by the notable event processing system. Action models of an embodiment may be categorized as such in that each action model perhaps produces a result that principally identifies and action step or sequence that may be invoked or executed in whole or in part by processing external to the notable event processing system such as the processing of a monitored system or environment as may have produced machine data underlying the original notable event instance. Action steps or sequences in the results of an action embodiment may be action steps or sequences that are performed in whole or in part by computer controlled systems, other automation, and/or human users or operators prompted by devices or mechanisms with user interface components. Many embodiments are possible.

Blocks 2042 and 2044 of the model construction phase of intelligent notable event triaging may represent, for the illustrated embodiment, processing as occurs subsequent to the original creation of a model at block 2040. The processing of blocks 2042 and 2044 may represent maintenance or reconstruction processing for completed models. At block 2042, a determination is made whether a model is to be rebuilt or refreshed. In an embodiment, the processing of block 2042 may be event-driven such as an example where a rebuild/refresh determination is made after a series of results from a particular model have deviated some threshold degree beyond an expected or desired measure. In an embodiment, the processing of block 2042 may be schedule-driven such as an example where a rebuild/refresh a determination is made periodically according to some frequency or other schedule. Other embodiments are possible. In an embodiment, processing to refresh a model 2044 may include making a replacement or change to a model instance without altering the underlying model template. In one example where a template includes a placeholder for a weight, factor, coefficient or such, for a particular model feature, and the placeholder value represented in a corresponding model instance may be derived from historical data for a recent period, processing to refresh the model may include newly deriving the placeholder value using data for the most recent period and including the newly derived value in the model instance. In an embodiment, processing to rebuild a model may include some, much, or all of the processing of block 2040 resulting in both a new or revised model template and model instance. In an embodiment, such model maintenance or reconstruction processing may occur in the background on an automatic or substantially automatic basis. Many embodiments are possible.

Block 2060 depicts processing as may be included in an embodiment to productively utilize constructed models of 2050 to effect triage modeling against notable event instances. In an embodiment, the notable event instances may arrive at block 2060 in real time or near real-time, perhaps as a stream, queue, collection, or such, of original notable event instances of 2014 as illustrated by 2028. For any score model determined to be applicable to or associated with an inbound notable event instance of 2028, the processing of block 2062 will produce a result for that model in respect of that notable event instance. Similarly, for any action model determined to be applicable to or associated with an inbound notable event instance of 2028, the processing of block 2066 will produce a result for that model in respect of that notable event instance. In an embodiment, such determinations and processing may be denominated as a Phase 3, or model results generation phase, of intelligent notable event triaging. In an embodiment, generated model results may be included amongst stored data resources 2010, and perhaps as a new or revised instance of enhanced notable event data 2026.

In an embodiment, generated model results produced at block 2062 may be used as depicted at block 2064 to determine, direct, or condition ongoing or future processing performed to effect the operation of the notable event processing system. As one example, processing of the NEPS to cause the display of a user interface having presentation components representing one or more notable event instances may be conditioned by generated results for a relevance score model stored at 2010 in determining or specifying a particular aspect of visual appearance of the presentation components, such as the color. That is to say, the results of a score model for a notable event may be used to determine the color in which it is displayed on a user interface such as 2004, in one example.

In an embodiment, generated model results produced at block 2066 may be used as depicted at block 2068 to incite, invoke, trigger, initiate, perform, or otherwise engage processing to effect an action in regards to a notable event instance. As one example, a generated result of block 2066 indicating a “reboot” action for a router or server device in the monitored system/environment, for example, may be utilized by the processing of block 2068 to formulate, direct, and send an action message 2072 to an action target 2070 via network 104 to thereby cause the action target (e.g., the router or the server) to perform a reboot operation in normal course. In one embodiment, the action message content may be substantially represented in the model result. In one embodiment, the action message content may be derived at least in part from information of the model result. Many embodiments are possible. While the foregoing example was illustrated and discussed in relation to an external action, one of skill will appreciate embodiments are not so limited.

In an embodiment, processing described in relation to blocks 2064 and 2068 may be denominated as a Phase 4, or model results use phase, of intelligent notable event triaging. In an embodiment, representations of Phase 4 processing may be included amongst stored data resources 2010, and perhaps as a new or revised instance of enhanced notable event data 2026.

The foregoing discussion regarding system 2000 of FIG. 20 is undertaken largely in reference to individual notable event instances, in part, to simplify the discussion. One of skill appreciates by consideration hereof that aspects of processing and representation discussed in regards to notable event instances may be readily applied to identified notable event groups each including multiple individual notable event instances, with or without the need for understandable adaptations. Examples of such notable event grouping may be appreciated by consideration of FIG. 34ZD1 through FIG. 34ZD10 and the related discussion of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2017-0046374 A1, entitled “Automatic Event Group Action Interface,” published Feb. 16, 2017, in respect of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 15/276,750, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference for all valid purposes.

FIG. 21 depicts an illustrative data structure for enhanced notable event data in one embodiment. The instance 2100 of an enhanced notable event data representation, record, collection, structure, group, organization, format, or such, corresponding to a particular notable event instance is shown in FIG. 21 to have notable event instance data 2110, NEPS data 2112, workflow/processing history data 2120, other data 2114, and triage model results information entries 2130 and 2150. Workflow/processing history data 2120 is shown to include workflow/processing history entries 2122, 2124, and 2126. Triage model results information entry 2130 is shown to include model instance ID information 2132, evaluation timestamp information 2134, status information 2136, other metadata 2138, model result value information 2140, and model rationale description information 2142. Triage model result information entry 2150 is shown to be configured with the same content as entry 2130.

Notable event instance data 2110 may include the data of the original or initial notable event instance, in whole or in part, to which the information of enhanced notable event data instance 2100 generally pertains. NEPS data 2112 may include, for example, status, checkpoint, flag, indicator, scratchpad, or other information created and maintained by or for NEPS processing functions in order to facilitate the orderly, coordinated, and meaningful operation of NEPS processing functions; such information corresponding perhaps particularly to the instance of enhanced notable event data 2100 and/or an underlying notable event as represented by 2110. Each of entries 2122, 2124, and 2126, of workflow/processing history data 2120 is shown to include: “Type” information which may identify a designated type for the entry as may be determined based on its source, use, content, categorization, or other factors, in an embodiment; “Timestamp” information which may indicate a start time, end time, creation time, entry time, reference time, and/or other time associated with the entry; “Data or Reference” information which may include, directly or by reference, any or all information useful for describing an event, step, process, or the like, in a workflow/processing timeline or history related to the underlying notable event instance as represented by 2110; and “Other Metadata” information as may be useful in an embodiment to represent or utilize an entry of workflow/processing history data 2120.

Triage model results information entries 2130 and 2150 represent instances of model results as may be reflected in enhanced notable event data in an embodiment by the processing of block 2062 or 2066 of FIG. 20, for example. The contents of triage model results information entry 2130 of FIG. 21 are discussed for this example is illustrated. Model Instance ID 2132 may include information that specifically identifies the definition of a model that produced the results. Such information may include information to specifically identify a particular template and/or instance representation reflected in a models data store, such as 2050 of FIG. 20, for example, and may perhaps include version and revision information. Evaluation timestamp information 2134 of FIG. 21 may include information about a start time, end time, duration, or such, descriptive of the model processing that produced the model results reflected by entry 2130. Status information 2136 may include any information to indicate or characterize a status associated with the modeling result or model instance reflected by entry 2130 and may include values such as “Active”, “Suspended”, and “Expired”, for example. Other metadata 2138 may include any other information useful in an embodiment to characterize or utilize the model result represented by the entry. In one embodiment, for example, other metadata 2138 may include a confidence score reflecting some measure of the reliability of the model result determined after its production. Model result value(s) 2140 may include information that represents one or more values produced by performing processing directed by a model definition identified at 2132 against information included in and/or related to the notable event represented at 2110. In one embodiment, such information may be the information of an instance of enhanced notable event data which preceded the instance illustrated by 2100, such as an earlier instance not including entry 2130. Model rationale description 2142 may include information produced, for example, by the processing of block 2062 or 2066 of FIG. 20 during the application of the model instance to the notable event instance, to document, record, reflect, or explain some or all of the features, factors, decision points, logic paths, or other elements, that were determinative or contributory to the result produced by the model.

Other data 2114 may include any information associated with or related to notable event 2110 or different information of enhanced notable event data 2100 as may be useful to the description and processing of the notable event by the NEPS.

One of skill will appreciate that an embodiment may benefit from the repeated, iterative, recursive, additive, or compounded processing related to a particular notable event over some useful lifetime, and that such subsequent processing might be conducted more efficiently by reducing unnecessary repetition and duplication by utilizing enhanced notable event data such as represented by 2100 of FIG. 21 previously produced. Accordingly, an embodiment may consider an enhanced notable event data instance as a notable event instance or an original notable event instance in regards to processing described herein where not logically precluded.

One of skill further appreciates that enhanced notable event data instance 2100 of FIG. 21 depicts one possible logical view of a collection of data items or components of varying descriptions. Embodiments may vary as to the content, representation, format, structure, and physical embodiment of such a collection without departing from inventive aspects taught herein. Data items or components may be included in such a collection directly, indirectly, implicitly, explicitly, or any other way as practiced in the art without departing from inventive aspects taught herein, unless reason, logic, or specific requirements stated in the teachings demand otherwise. One of skill appreciates that the enhanced notable event data instance 2100 of FIG. 21 is but one possible example useful to teach and improve an understanding of inventive aspects taught herein, and does not limit the practice of the inventive aspects.

FIG. 22 depicts a system diagram for notable event processing including certain feedback in one embodiment. Triage modeling system 2200 is shown to include data resources 2210, model construction processing 2220, stored model 2240, notable event instances 2028, operational model processing 2252, telemetry data processing 2254, modeler user interface apparatus 2002, and user interface apparatus 2004. Data resources 2210 is shown to include enhanced notable event data 2212, applied model telemetry data 2214, and other data 2216. Model construction processing 2220 is shown to include modeling component 2222, training component 2224, and testing component 2226. Modeling component 2222 is shown to include feature determination component 2232, model type determination component 2234, and control/configuration parameter determination component 2236. Stored model 2240 is shown to include self-referential feature 2242.

Data resources 2210 may correspond to data resources 2010 of FIG. 20. Similarly, enhanced notable event data 2212 of FIG. 22 may correspond to enhanced notable event data 2026 of FIG. 20, and other data 2216 of FIG. 22 may correspond to other data 2024 of FIG. 20. Applied model telemetry data 2214 of FIG. 22 may find correspondence in an embodiment to notable event post-creation data 2016 of FIG. 20, other data 2024, or such, or may be included within an instance of enhanced notable event data such as 2026 of FIG. 20 or 2212 of FIG. 22, in an embodiment.

Model construction processing 2220 of FIG. 22 may correspond to processing earlier illustrated and discussed in relation to block 2040 of FIG. 20. Model construction processing 2220 may broadly use data resources as may be represented by 2210, and is not limited to the specific data resources 2212, 2214, and 2216, specifically shown in FIG. 22 for purposes of the immediate discussion. Model construction processing 2220 of FIG. 22 may include components as necessary or desired to effect the construction of triaging models in an embodiment. Model construction processing 2220 is shown to have a modeling component 2222 which may provide the functionality needed to develop a stored representation of a triaging model. Feature determination component 2232 of model construction processing 2220 represents processing as may be implemented in an embodiment to determine a specific identification set, list, group, collection, or the like, of one or more data fields, items, components, features, factors, or such which provide input values for the prospective model which are used to determine its result. Such processing, in one embodiment, may include processing to receive input from a user identifying a type, quality, character, purpose, semantic, or such, of the desired model output (e.g., a predicted probability that a condition represented by a subject notable event will self-resolve within 10 minutes of its creation), and to automatically identify a set of one or more data features known or likely to be useful, efficient, and/or effective, to producing that desired model output. Such processing, in one embodiment, may include functionality to prompt for and gather user input to direct processing sequences to ultimately identify a set of one or more data features known or likely to be useful, efficient, and/or effective, for producing the desired model output. Such embodiments may vary as to the degree of user interaction throughout the process of identifying a feature set. Such embodiments may include a semiautomatic embodiment where processes solicit user input for selecting from available options, indicating approval or acceptance, supplying authorization or credentials, or such, within a substantially automated or pre-programmed workflow for identifying a feature set. Such embodiments may include an analyst-directed embodiment where user input is chiefly responsible for determining the sequence of processing used to arrive at an identified feature set. In an embodiment, any interaction required by the system with an analyst/modeler may be effected by information displays on a user interface device such as 2002 and by receiving signals from the user interface device which indicate user interactions in relation to the displays. Many embodiments are possible.

Model determination component 2234 of model construction processing 2220 represents processing as may be implemented in an embodiment to determine a simple or compound model type, category, design, class, or such, that indicates the processing applied to the set of input features such as may be determined at block 2232 in order to produce the triaging model result. In one embodiment, the processing of block 2234 may automatically process the feature set against one or more permutations or combinations of known model types to determine a first model type that provides a threshold measure of confidence, for example, producing a correct result 90% of the time given historical norms. In such an embodiment, known model types may include one or more model types used to effect artificial intelligence (AI) or machine learning (ML), such as anomaly detectors, classifiers, clusterers, regressors, time series analyzers, deep learning models, reinforcement learning models, and others; and more specifically, linear regression, logistic regression, cluster analysis, naïve Bayes classification, decision tree classifiers, random forest classifiers, gradient-boosted tree classifiers, and many other model types or paradigms. In one embodiment, the processing of block 2234 may automatically determine characteristics of the feature set (e.g. all numeric features) and therefrom determine a model type, ranked list of model types, or such, that are estimated by program logic to have usefulness, efficiency, and/or effectiveness in producing a triaging model result from the input features. In one embodiment, the processing of block 2234 may include a semiautomatic embodiment where processes solicit user input for selecting from available options, indicating approval or acceptance, supplying authorization or credentials, or such, within a substantially automated or pre-programmed workflow for identifying a model type for the prospective model. Embodiments may include an analyst-directed embodiment where user input is chiefly responsible for determining the sequence of processing used to arrive at an identification of a model type for the prospective model. Many embodiments are possible.

Control/configuration parameter determination component 2236 of model construction processing 2220 represents processing as may be implemented to effect processing which identifies, ascertains, or determines certain control and/or configuration information as may be included in a stored representation of a triaging model in an embodiment. In an embodiment, such information may include information directly related to inputs, processing, or outputs of the model. In an embodiment, such information may include information related to the use, operation, administration, or such, of the model definition within the notable event processing system including, for example, information indicating model state (e.g., active, inactive, suspended, superseded, deprecated, etc.), model times or time frames (e.g., creation time, first use time, last use time, expiration, active time-of-day windows, refresh times, rebuild times, etc.), and others. In an embodiment, the control/configuration parameter determination of component 2236 may be wholly or partly automatic, semiautomatic, analyst-determined, and may include combinations thereof.

Components 2232, 2234, and 2236 of model construction processing 2220 are shown in FIG. 22 to be each interconnected with the others by a bidirectional arrow indicating potential processing flows. Such a depiction conveys that model construction may effectively be implemented as a dynamic, variable, flexible, and/or iterative process, where information or determinations arising in later processing may indicate or suggest modifications to information or determinations arising in earlier processing, with appropriate adjustment and reprocessing. Automatic, semiautomatic, analyst-driven, and hybrid embodiments may all benefit by the accommodation of such dynamism of processing flow. Many embodiments are possible.

In one embodiment, a prospective or precursor triaging model definition results from the processing of block 2222. Embodiments may vary as to the degree of completion the prospective model represents toward a deployment-ready model. In one embodiment, for example, where an input feature may be associated in the model/type with a corresponding weighting factor or coefficient, the prospective model representation produced at 2222 may include an initial weighting factor value. In one embodiment, where an input feature may be associated in the model/type with a corresponding weighting factor or coefficient, this prospective model representation may include empty weighting factor values that are populated by subsequent processing of 2220. Many embodiments are possible.

A prospective triaging model definition produced by the processing of block 2222 becomes an input to training component 2224 of the example triage modeling system 2200 depicted in FIG. 22. In an embodiment, the processing of training component 2224 may determine from a set of sample data (not specifically shown) and the prospective triaging model definition, additional or revised informational values to be included in a deployment-ready model. The set of sample data may include information for multiple instances of all of the input features of the model. In an embodiment, a set of sample data may include manufactured or simulated data, possibly reflecting a certain timeframe, period, or duration, about a monitored or hypothetical system or environment. In an embodiment, a set of sample data may include actual historical data for a certain timeframe, period, or duration about a monitored system or environment. Such sample data may include actual or manufactured notable event instances, of a type to which the model under development is intended to apply, and related information such as enhanced notable event data. Many embodiments are possible. At the completion of the processing of component 2224, a testing-ready model definition exists. A testing-ready model of one embodiment may include all of the information indicating the inputs, processing, and outputs for a determination, application, execution, or such, of the model against a particular notable event instance—given an identification of a particular notable event instance and an affirmative indication to process the model against it. A testing-ready model of one embodiment may or may not include values for other information of a triage model definition such as operational and administrative information as described, for example, in relation to the processing of block 2236.

A testing-ready model definition produced by the processing of block 2224 in this illustrative example becomes an input to test component 2226 of the example triage modeling system 2200 depicted in FIG. 22. In an embodiment, the processing of test component 2226 produces a result set from processing the model against a set of test data. The test data may be composed of data after the fashion of the sample data discussed in relation to the processing of block 2224. In an embodiment, the test data set may be smaller than the sample data set. In an embodiment, the test data set may not intersect the sample data set. In an embodiment, the sample data set and the test data set may each be a non-overlapping extraction from a larger modeling source data set such as a historical data set or a manufactured data set. Each of the test data set and sample data set include relevant notable event instances to which the model under construction may pertain or be associated, and each of the test data set and the sample data set include instances of information for model features. The set of results produced by the processing of test component 2226 is evaluated to determine whether the model meets one or more threshold performance requirement criterion for a deployable model. Such a criterion may include, for example, maintaining a maximum deviation of applied model results from actual historical values. Many embodiments are possible.

Successful completion of the processing of model construction processing 2220 of FIG. 22 results in a stored deployment model definition 2240. Model definition 2240 may correspond to the combination of a model template and model instance, such as 2052 and 2054 of FIG. 20, in an embodiment. Model definition 2240 of FIG. 22 is shown to include self-referential feature 2242. Self-referential feature 2242 represents a model feature such as determined by the processing of block 2232. In one embodiment, self-referential feature 2242 may represent an information feature of telemetry data reflecting one or more earlier executions of a deployment model against notable event data. For example, self-referential feature 2242 may incorporate into the model the result of a most recent execution of the selfsame model against the same underlying notable event at an earlier time, perhaps five minutes ago. In one embodiment, self-referential feature 2242 may represent an information feature of telemetry data reflecting recorded executions of a particular deployment model against one or more notable events of the same type. In one embodiment, self-referential feature 2242 may represent an information feature of telemetry data reflecting recorded executions of a particular deployment model against one or more notable events of different types. In one embodiment, self-referential feature 2242 may represent an information feature of telemetry data reflecting one or more recorded executions of a different deployment model against the immediate underlying notable event instance. Many embodiments are possible where a model feature incorporates information previously produced by model processing functionality of a notable event processing system.

Triage modeling system 2200 shows operational/deployment model 2240 as an input to the processing of block 2252. Processing block 2252 performs the model-based inbound notable event processing as earlier described in relation of block 2060 of FIG. 20. Accordingly notable event instances 2028 and user interface apparatus 2004 of FIG. 20 are repeated here in FIG. 22 in relationship to processing block 2252. The notable events processing of block 2252 includes the execution/application of a triaging model in respect of notable event instances to determine corresponding model result instances and includes the utilization of such results in certain downstream processing. Accordingly, notable events processing block 2252 of FIG. 22 represents what has earlier been described as Phases 3 and 4 of triage model processing for a notable event processing system (NEPS). Notable events processing block 2252 is also suggested in the depiction of triage modeling system 2200 to include instrumentation processing to generate instances of applied model telemetry data 2214. Such instances of applied model telemetry data may reflect information arising from each or any instance of the execution of a triaging model against notable events. Such information may predominantly reflect or characterize the model execution, the notable event, or some combination, in one embodiment. Such model execution telemetry data may reflect any states, conditions, determinations, or processing arising from the execution of model 2240 as determined by identifying, detecting, capturing, recording, or the like, any such states, conditions, determinations, or processing, and representing the same as telemetry data in computer storage such as the applied model telemetry data 2214 of data resources 2210. In one example embodiment, applied telemetry model data 2214 may include information about the time required and resources utilized to make a prediction using the model, an accuracy determined for the prediction, and subsequent processing that employed the prediction. Embodiments may vary widely as to the types, frequency, and representations of telemetry data which may effectively represent in a detailed or summary fashion partial snapshots of states of a system over time. In one embodiment, instrumentation functionality may capture a pinhole view into overall state by recording a number of values at a moment in time. Such captured values may be instantaneous values, aggregates, or statistical summaries. In one embodiment, instrumentation functionality may capture information about the states of a program's memory, execution, software environment, hardware environment, user input, or others. Many embodiments are possible. Triage model results information entry 2130 is but one example of applied model telemetry data in one embodiment where certain applied model telemetry data (e.g. 2214 of FIG. 22) may be integrated into enhanced notable event data (e.g. 2212 of FIG. 22). Such integration of model telemetry data may be useful where an embodiment includes instances of model telemetry data having a direct or substantial correlation with few or singular notable event instances.

Example triage modeling system 2200 of FIG. 22 is shown to include additional processing outside of the notable events processing of block 2252 that also produces applied model telemetry data 2214. Processing block 2254 represents processing to determine special model telemetry data. Processing block 2254 may represent instrumentation processing in one embodiment that executes independently of, and perhaps asynchronously with, the Phase 3 and 4 processing represented at block 2252. The processing of block 2254 may include determining telemetry data about an operational/deployment model that possibly represents or characterizes multiple model executions across multiple notable events, states or changes in the operating environment relevant to the model, state changes for the model itself such as a suspension or expiration event, or recognizable patterns or trends in recent model results, for example. In one example embodiment, processing of block 2254 may include determining a measure of the accuracy of the model or instances of its predictions, a trend over time as regards a measure of its accuracy such as an average increase or decrease in deviations of actual from predicted or a maximum or range of deviations of actual from predicted, or a trend over time as regards a measure of its cost in terms of time or computing resources. In one embodiment, processing of block 2254 may include determining metrics or measurement of historical performance including metrics of accuracy, precision, recall, root-mean-square error (RMSE), coefficients of determination (R²), and others. In one embodiment, processing of block 2254 may include determining metrics or measurements of resource consumption including time-per-inference, memory usage, model size, or others. In one embodiment, processing of block 2254 may include determining, identifying, collecting, or the like, feedback information including measurements or indicators of recommendation rejections (i.e., a recommendation is ignored based on user input or automatic processing of a downstream system component), or of triaging time trends (e.g., shorter or longer triaging times). Many embodiments are possible. The processing to determine special model telemetry data as represented by block 2254 may include storing such data as applied model telemetry data 2214. In an embodiment triage modeling system 2200, information of applied model telemetry data 2214, whether regular, special, or otherwise, may be useful in providing the data of a self-referential feature 2242 of an operational/deployment model 2240, as may have been introduced during the construction of model 2240 by the processing of block 2232, for example.

One of skill in consideration of what is taught by the foregoing will appreciate the variety of possible embodiments for models with self-referential features and model telemetry data. One of skill upon such consideration may also appreciate benefits as may accrue to such embodiments including the improved operation of triaging models with feedback mechanisms for self-learning, adaptation, self-healing, or such. Such benefits may include improvements in the reliability, effectiveness, accuracy, efficiency, or such, of both the model processing and the notable event processing overall; and/or a reduction in computing resources and human interactions required to maintain a stable of deployed models. From the examples illustrated and discussed, one of skill will have the understanding to practice inventive aspects well beyond the examples themselves and, accordingly, will understand that the details discussed for example embodiments do not limit the practice of inventive aspects taught herein.

FIG. 23 illustrates an example triaging model specification. Conceptual model 2300 is an equation useful for representing a linear regression-based model type. Linear regression has been chosen as the model type in this example for its simplicity and relatively widespread understandability, in order that an understanding of the inventive aspects disclosed herein is not obscured with unnecessary detail. Consideration of the example, illustrations, and discussion presented in regards to conceptual model 2300 of FIG. 23, and of the sample embodiments of computer storage representations for such a model as depicted in FIGS. 24-26, serve to aid the development of an understanding of the practice of inventive aspects as taught herein to one of skill in the art. Accordingly, one of skill in the art will readily appreciate a distinction between inventive aspects that may be broadly practiced and the details of specific examples used for purposes of illustration.

The conceptual model equation 2300 of FIG. 23 is seen as “Predicted First Action Delay=(A·SR_(ServicePriority))+(B·SR_(InipactedUserCount))+(C·SR_(TechsonDutycount))+(D·P₁)+(E·1)”. Model 2300 can therefrom be understood to represent a hypothetical model that produces a value representing a predicted delay until some first action regarding a notable event instance to which it is applied. Such a model can be understood to be a score type, class, or category of model as previously discussed in relation to FIG. 20. In one embodiment, the predicted first action delay value produced by the model may represent units of time such as seconds, minutes, tenths-of-hours, or such. In one embodiment, the predicted first action delay value produced by the model may represent a position on a spectrum of small to large delays without any direct or linear correspondence to specific time measurements. In such an embodiment, the predicted first action delay model results may be mapped in ranges to some secondary model result values that provide a succinct, textual, alternative, and/or normalized representation of the result. For example, model values determined in respect to the equation in the range of 75-100 may take on a secondary value of 1 meaning “short”, in the range of 25-74 may take on a secondary value of two meaning “typical”, and in the range of 1-24 may take on a secondary value of 3 meaning “long”. In one embodiment, the predicted first action delay value produced by the model may not represent units of time, nor may it represent a position on a spectrum, but rather may represent a value mostly useful to perform a relative comparison between different notable events scored by the same model. Many embodiments are possible.

An examination of model 2300 reveals that five components go into the production of the predicted first action delay model result value. Each component includes a model feature (data item) and an associated weighting factor or coefficient. The components are as follows. Model feature SR_(ServicePriority), in this hypothetical example, is a value from a search result that indicates a service priority, and is associated with the coefficient A. Model feature SR_(ImpactedUserCount), in this hypothetical example, is a value from a search result that indicates a count of impacted users, and is associated with the coefficient B. Model feature SR_(TechsOnDutyCount), in this hypothetical example, is a value from a search result that indicates a count of technicians on duty, and is associated with the coefficient C. Model feature P₁, in this hypothetical example, is a parameter value that perhaps indicates a systemwide value for the notable event processing system, and is associated with the coefficient D. Model feature 1, in this hypothetical example, is the identity constant value of one which leaves allows the component value to be determined entirely by the trained coefficient, and is associated with the coefficient E. Further examination of model 2300 reveals that the model result value indicating a predicted first action delay can be determined by summing the result of multiplying each model feature by its coefficient. While a discussion of conceptual model 2300 is useful to develop an understanding of a model and its parts in one example, a discussion of a computer-based implementation of such a model may be more useful to illuminate inventive aspects for practice in an automated notable event processing system as described herein.

FIGS. 24-26 depict computer-based implementations for representing triaging models. FIGS. 24-26 are based on an embodiment having a bifurcated model representation such as discussed in relation to FIG. 20 that includes model template and model instance portions, such as 2052 and 2054 of FIG. 20 which portions together constitute a complete score model instance, and 2056 and 2058 of FIG. 20 which portions together constitute a complete action model instance. FIG. 24 depicts a representation for a model template as may support a score-type model such as 2300 of FIG. 23. FIGS. 25-26 each depict a representation for a model instance as may support a score-type model such as 2300 of FIG. 23, and as may be used in conjunction with the template representation of FIG. 24 to effect execution of the represented model against a notable event instance. The depictions represented by FIGS. 24-26 are illustrative examples and one of skill can appreciate after consideration thereof how to adapt such examples or alternatively implement an embodiment to accommodate the various model types supported by such an embodiment.

FIG. 24 depicts one computer storage representation of an example triaging model template. Template representation 2400 is depicted as a tabular data structure containing information in one embodiment to represent a template for conceptual model 2300 of FIG. 23 as previously discussed. Template representation 2400 is shown to include header row 2410, and data rows 2420, 2422, 2424, 2426, 2428, each representing a single model component. Each row of template representation 2400 is shown to include an information value for each of columns 2442, 2444, 2446, 2448, 2450, and 2552. Header row 2410 which is included to facilitate this explanation contains a field name, designation, or semantic for the information values in the corresponding columns of each of the data rows. Information values shown in column 2442 are indicated to identify an equation subpart. Column 2442 suggests that a model template of this embodiment may be complex or compound, determining results independently for multiple equation subparts and possibly combining them into a single result according to an implemented methodology. For ease of illustration, all of the model components illustrated here and represented in the data rows of representation 2400 are indicated to belong to the same and only equation subpart, designated as “1”. Information values shown in column 2444 are indicated to identify a function. The value indicated in column 2444 identifies a processing function, perhaps a mathematical operation, that is to be used to combine the value determined for the model component represented by the data row with those of other model components of the same equation subpart. In accordance with conceptual model 2300 of FIG. 23, all data rows of representation 2400 of FIG. 24 are shown as identifying an “Add” function in order to affect the summing operation specified in the conceptual model. Information values shown in column 2446 are indicated to specify whether the model component utilizes a coefficient. In accordance with conceptual model 2300 of FIG. 23, all data rows of representation 2400 of FIG. 24 are shown to indicate a “Y” representing that “yes” each of these data components includes the coefficient. Information value shown in column 2448 are indicated to specify an identification of a coefficient value, a “Coefficient ID”, such as the name of a field or variable holding the coefficient value. In this illustrative embodiment, a coefficient ID appearing in column 2448 is used to identify, correlate, or associate a coefficient value included in a representation of a model instance definition corresponding to the model template of representation 2400. Information values shown in column 2550 are indicated to designate a type associated with the source of the data variable (i.e., feature) of the model component represented by a data row. In accordance with conceptual model 2300 of FIG. 23: data rows 2420, 2422, and 2424 are shown to have a Variable Source Type of “Search” in column 2450 indicating that the model feature value is returned in a search result; data row 2426 is shown to have a Variable Source Type of “Parameter” in column 2450 indicating that the model feature value is a parameter, such as a defined system parameter; and data row 2428 is shown to have a Variable Source Type of “Constant” column 2450 indicating that the model feature value is established by the coefficient alone. Information value shown in column 2552 are indicated to provide an identification of the source for the model feature value, and the content and meaning of such a Variable Source ID may depend, for example, on the associated Variable Source Type of column 2450, in an embodiment. In accordance with conceptual model 2300 of FIG. 23: data row 2420 is shown with the value “PFAD_ServicePriority.txt” in column 2452 which for a “Search” Variable Source Type indicates the name of the file specifying a search query producing a value for the model feature SR_(ServicePriority); data row 2422 is shown with the value “PFAD_ImpactedUserCount.txt” in column 2452 which indicates the name of the file specifying a search query producing a value for the model feature SR_(ImpactedUserCount); data row 2424 is shown with the value “PFAD_TechOnDutyCount.txt” in column 2452 which indicates the name of the file specifying a search query producing a value for the model feature SR_(TechsOnDutyCount); data row 2426 is shown with the value “1” in column 2452 which for a “Parameter” Variable Source Type indicates the ordinal position of the desired parameter value within a sequence of one or more parameter values in an embodiment; and data row 2428 is shown with the value “25” in column 2452 which for a “Constant” Variable Source Type indicates the value of the model factor, itself, rather than an identification of some other source. Accordingly, column 2452 is the variable source for a model feature having a Variable Source Type of “Constant”, rather than being a Variable Source ID.

Upon consideration of model template representation 2400 of FIG. 24, one of skill appreciates how the representation 2400 embodies conceptual model 2300 of FIG. 23 in an effective computer readable form. One of skill further appreciates how the representation 2400 includes sufficient information to direct processing in order to determine values for the model feature of each model component, to direct processing to integrate content of a companion model instance (i.e., coefficient values) to determine values for the coefficients of the model template, and to direct processing in order to combine together fully instantiated model component values (i.e., any specified coefficient value and the model feature value). Two possible representations for a model instance definition compatible with the model template definition illustrated by representation 2400 of FIG. 24 are next discussed in relation to FIG. 25 and FIG. 26.

FIGS. 25 and 26 each depict an illustrative computer representation of a model instance component of an example triaging model definition. Model instance representation 2500 of FIG. 25 is shown to include header information section 2502 and body information section 2520. Header information section 2502 is shown to include ID component 2510, time component 2512, enabled status indicator component 2514, suspended status indicator component 2516, and other information component 2518. ID component 2510 may include information useful to uniquely identifying the represented model instance. In one embodiment, such an ID component may include version and/or revision information in addition to a base ID. In one embodiment, such an ID component may include information for correlating the represented model instance with its corresponding template. Other embodiments are possible. Time component 2512 may include any information designating points in time, time ranges, durations, schedules, frequencies, and such, as may be meaningfully associated with the represented model instance. Examples include creation time, expiration time, valid time windows, first use time, last used time, and others. Enabled status indicator component 2514 may include information to indicate a state of enablement for the model instance represented by 2500 perhaps in regards to its general availability for use during production processing. Example states may include enabled, disabled, expired, deprecated, and others. Suspended status indicator component 2516 may include information to indicate a state of suspension for the model instance represented by 2500 perhaps in regard to some specific aspect of availability or appropriateness for use during production processing. As one example, the suspended status indicator component 2516 may indicate that the represented model instance is presently suspended from active use because the current time-of-day is outside of a window of applicability associated with the model instance. Example status indicator values may include active, suspending, suspended, resuming, and others. Other information component 2518 may include any information useful to effect processing related to the use, administration, and any other aspects, of the model instance of representation 2500.

Body information section 2520 of representation 2500 of FIG. 25 is shown to include a textual information format that reflects model information for combination with an associated model template to render a complete and executable triaging model definition. The textual information of this illustrated example comports with the standard representation or encoding format known as JavaScript Object Notation (or JSON). The content of body information section 2520 accordingly indicates that a data object named ModelInstance_PFAD_1 at 2530 (a model instance definition in pertinent part) subsumes an array of data objects each having a “CoefficientID” key and corresponding value, and a “Value” key and its corresponding value. Data object representation 2534 is an example of one element of the array of data objects. Data object representation 2534 is shown to indicate an object useful for mapping a Coefficient ID of a model template representation such as 2400 of FIG. 24 to a specific value in order to execute the model against a notable event instance. Data object representation 2534 of FIG. 25 is shown to have a value of “B” for key “CoefficientID” which corresponds to Coefficient ID “B” appearing in column 2448 of data row 2422 of FIG. 24. Data object representation 2534 of FIG. 25 is shown to have a value of “−0.001” for key “Value” which is correlated to the Coefficient ID “B” appearing in column 2448 of data row 2422 of FIG. 24 in order to execute the model represented thereby. Model instance coefficient values represented in the other elements of the array of data objects are similarly mapped or correlated.

Model instance representation 2600 of FIG. 26 is shown to include header information section 2602 and body information section 2604. Header information section 2602 shows a duplication of the information illustrated and described for header information section 2502 of FIG. 25 and such description will not be repeated here. Body information section 2604 of FIG. 26 is shown to include a textual information format that reflects model information for combination with an associated model template to render a complete and executable triaging model definition. The textual information of this illustrated example comports with the standard representation or encoding format known as Comma Separated Values (or CSV). The content of body information section 2604 includes line 2610 which provides an ordered list of field or data item names or identifiers that correspond by ordinal position to the data values provided in subsequent lines. Each subsequent line is shown to include a value corresponding to each of the field names represented in line 2610. The individual field names or values appearing in a line are separated one from another by commas in the illustrated embodiment. One of skill may appreciate that the CSV encoded information of body information section 2604 of FIG. 26 may be considered or represented as a table or table-like data structure and, particularly, as a lookup table for mapping CoefficientID's of its first column to coefficient values of its second column. Accordingly, the value “56” may be readily mapped as the coefficient value for the model component represented in the model template by data row 2420 of FIG. 24, the value “−0.001” may be readily mapped as the coefficient value for the model component represented in the model template by data row 2422, the value “−0.25” may be readily mapped is the coefficient value for the model component represented in the model template by data row 2424, the value “4” may be readily mapped as the coefficient value for the model component represented in the model template by data row 2426, and the value “120” may be readily mapped as the coefficient value for the model component represented in the model template by data row 2428.

As with the model instance definition representation 2500 of FIG. 25, the model instance definition representation 2600 of FIG. 26 may be efficiently and effectively combined with the associated model template definition representation 2400 of FIG. 24 to result in a complete model instance that is executable against a notable event instance by a notable event processing system (NEPS). The above embodiments are understandably illustrative of the many embodiments that are possible which may practice inventive aspects taught herein.

FIG. 27 depicts a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of processing for scoring models. System flow 2700 is shown to include model data store 2702, notable event data store 2704, and related processing. The processing of system flow 2700 appearing above line 2701 represents processing an embodiment for executing model instances against notable event instances. Such is the processing contemplated by block 2062 of FIG. 20 and referred to elsewhere herein as triage modeling Phase 3 processing of a notable event processing system (NEPS). The processing of system flow 2700 of FIG. 27 appearing below line 2701 represents processing of an embodiment that utilizes model results determined in Phase 3 to determine or condition its operation. Such is the processing contemplated by block 2064 of FIG. 20 and referred to elsewhere herein as triage modeling Phase 4 processing of an NEPS.

At block 2710 of FIG. 27, information of a notable event instance is received by the Phase 3 functional processing. In one embodiment, the received notable event instance may be an original notable event instance. In one embodiment, a notable event instance may be an enhanced notable event data instance. In one embodiment, a notable event instance may be either an original notable event instance or an enhanced notable event data instance. In one embodiment, receiving the notable event instance may include receiving a reference to information representing the notable event instance such as a pointer. In one embodiment, receiving the notable event instance may include receiving an identifier for the notable event instance such as a notable event instance ID number. In one embodiment, receiving the notable event instance may include receiving the data of a representation of the contents of the notable event instance. Many embodiments are possible.

At block 2712, one or more score models that have correspondence or association with the notable event instance received at 2710 are determined or identified. In one embodiment, a notable event type included in the information of the notable event instance is correlated to one or more score model instances. In one embodiment, such correlation may be effected by searching for deployed model instances having the same notable event type reflected in their definition, perhaps as in the other information component 2518 of model instance representation 2500 of FIG. 25. In such an embodiment, the deployed model instances may be included among the data of model data store 2702. In one embodiment, such correlation may be effected by performing a search in a lookup table implementation using the notable event type as the search key and returning any and all deployed model instances listed in the lookup table as corresponding to that notable event type. Many embodiments are possible.

At block 2714, a current model is received into a processing loop beginning at block 2714. At the first entry into the processing of block 2714, the current model may be the first entry in a list of models that results from the processing of block 2712. In an embodiment, the processing to receive the current model may include receiving location or identifying information for a deployed model instance. In an embodiment, the processing to receive the current model may include accessing, retrieving, moving, or such, the information of the model representation using identifying or location information for the representation. In an embodiment, the processing to receive the current model may include accessing, retrieving, moving, or such, a representation of the model passed or transmitted to the processing of block 2714, perhaps as part of its invocation. Representations of deployed model instances may be included among the data of model data store 2702. Many embodiments are possible.

At block 2716, a determination is made whether the current model is usable for present purposes, i.e., to produce a corresponding model result in respect of a notable event instance. In one embodiment, the processing of 2716 may determine from information in the model instance representation or elsewhere whether the model instance is associated with a disabled state and therefore not usable. In one embodiment, the processing of 2716 may determine from information in the model instance representation or elsewhere whether the model instance is associated with a suspended state and therefore not usable. Implementations may vary as to the number and character of determinations made in the processing of block 2716 in order to determine the usability of a current model. In one embodiment, any model successfully received by the processing of block 2714 is determined to be usable. Many embodiments are possible.

If the processing of block 2716 determines that the current model is unusable, processing proceeds to block 2718. At block 2718 a determination is made whether models determined by the processing of block 2712 remain unprocessed. If so, such an unprocessed model is designated as the current model and processing returns to the top of the loop at block 2714. If not, processing proceeds to block 2722 which ends the Phase 3 processing shown for system flow 2700 of FIG. 27.

If the processing of block 2716 determines that the current model is usable, processing proceeds to block 2724. At block 2724, the current model is executed or applied against the notable event instance received at block 2710. In an embodiment, executing or applying the current model may include accessing information of the model definition to direct or condition subsequent processing to identify, access, and/or retrieve input information, and to produce a model result therefrom. For example, information of the model definition may be direct processing to perform a search query and collect its result as input data. For example, information of the model definition may direct processing to combine multiple input data items in a specific way, such as by summing or averaging. Many embodiments are possible. With a model result in hand, processing proceeds to block 2726.

At block 2726, the model results produced at block 2724 is recorded, reflected, associated, or otherwise related to the notable event instance received at block 2710. In one embodiment, information reflecting the execution of the model against the notable event instance, including the produced result, is included in the enhanced notable event data instance corresponding to the subject notable event instance. Such enhanced notable event data instances may be included among the data of notable event data store 2704. Model results information entry 2130 of FIG. 21 is an example of such information. In one embodiment, information reflecting the execution of the model against the notable event instance, including the produced result, is reflected in computer storage of a model results table along with a cross reference to the subject notable event instance. Many embodiments are possible. Processing then proceeds to block 2718 for a possible return to the top of the processing loop if unprocessed models remain.

At block 2730 of FIG. 27, Phase 4 functional processing receives information of a modeled result for a notable event instance as previously produced by the Phase 3 processing already described. In an embodiment, the processing to receive the modeled result may include accessing, retrieving, moving, or such, information of a modeled result as may be included among the information of notable event data store 2704, for example. In an embodiment, the processing to receive the modeled result may include accessing, retrieving, moving, or such, a representation of the model passed or transmitted to the processing of block 2730, perhaps as part of its invocation. Many embodiments are possible.

At block 2732, the model result received at block 2730 is used to determine or direct certain processing, perhaps particularly in relation to the corresponding notable event instance. For example, functional processing to generate a user interface display presenting an apparent list representing multiple notable event instances may include an aspect that sequentially builds the presentation list. Such an aspect may include processing to determine the next notable event instance to be represented during the build of the presentation list, and such processing to determine, select, or identify the notable event instance may be dependent or conditioned on the score model result information. Many embodiments utilizing modeled result information for notable event instances are possible. Continuing with the example just discussed, processing may proceed to block 2734 where the generated user interface display including content-related or appearance-related aspects determined at least in part using modeled result data, is caused to be displayed on a user interface device (not shown).

After consideration of the foregoing, one of skill can appreciate that the Phase 4 processing described above is but one illustrative example of the many worthwhile uses of modeled result data. The practice of inventive aspects as disclosed herein is not limited to the details and examples discussed.

FIG. 28 depicts a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of processing for action models. System flow 2800 is shown to include model data store 2702, notable event data store 2704, and related processing. The processing of system flow 2800 appearing above line 2801 represents processing an embodiment for executing model instances against notable event instances. Such is the processing contemplated by block 2062 of FIG. 20 and referred to elsewhere herein as triage modeling Phase 3 processing of a notable event processing system (NEPS). The processing of system flow 2800 of FIG. 28 appearing below line 2801 represents processing of an embodiment that utilizes model results determined in Phase 3 to determine or condition its operation. Such is the processing contemplated by block 2064 of FIG. 20 and referred to elsewhere herein as Phase 4 triage model processing of an NEPS. The Phase 3 processing depicted for system flow 2800 can be seen to essentially duplicate the Phase 3 processing depicted and described for system flow 2700 of FIG. 27. One understandable difference may be that the model data of 2702 used in the processing of blocks 2812 and 2814 of system flow 2800 of FIG. 28 would be data representative of action model instances rather than score model instances. An embodiment, too, may perform the Phase 3 processing depicted for FIG. 27 or FIG. 28 for all model instances regardless of type as may be associated with a received notable event instance. Further elaboration on the Phase 3 processing depicted for system flow 2800 of FIG. 28 is unnecessary other than to specifically call out that the processing represented by blocks 2810, 2812, 2814, 2816, 2818, 2820, 2822, 2824, and 2826 of FIG. 28 correspond to the processing already discussed in relation to blocks 2710, 2712, 2714, 2716, 2718, 2720, 2722, 2724, and 2726 of FIG. 27, respectively. In contrast, the Phase 4 processing depicted for system flow 2800 of FIG. 28 appears more elaborate than the Phase 4 processing depicted and discussed for system flow 2700 of FIG. 27. That discussion now begins.

The Phase 4 processing of system flow 2800 of FIG. 28 is shown to begin at block 2830. The processing of block 2830 largely duplicates the processing described for processing block 2730 of FIG. 27 other than that the received result is one produced by a triaging action model rather than a triaging scoring model. In an embodiment, the processing to receive the modeled result may include accessing, retrieving, moving, or such, information of a modeled result as may be included among the information of notable event data store 2704 of FIG. 28, for example. In an embodiment, the processing to receive the modeled result may include accessing, retrieving, moving, or such, a representation of the model passed or transmitted to the processing of block 2830, perhaps as part of its invocation.

At block 2832, a determination is made whether the result from the action model includes multiple action candidates or recommendations. If not, processing proceeds to block 2836. If so, processing proceeds to block 2834 where functionality to ascertain a user selection from among the multiple action candidates or recommendations is exercised. In one embodiment, the processing of block 2834 may include processing to cause the display of a presentation on a user interface device that includes representations for each of the action recommendations in the modeled output with corresponding interactive elements or processes enabling a user to indicate an identification or selection of one or more of the action recommendations as desired actions to be performed. The processing of block 2834 may include processing to receive signal information indicative of any user interaction with the interactive elements and, in response thereto, modify or augment a representation of the modeled output to reflect the indications made by the user. In one embodiment, actions in the modeled output that were not indicated for selection by the user may be deleted from the group, set, list, collection, or such, of action recommendations in the modeled output. In one embodiment, actions in the modeled output are each flagged or tagged with information to indicate selection, non-selection, or some other state, as indicated by the user interaction. Many embodiments are possible. In one embodiment, a user interface device utilized by processing of block 2834 may be a telephone coupled to automatic interactive voice response (IVR) apparatus. In such an embodiment, presentation of information to the user may include text-to-speech processing, and interactive elements may include structured periods during the phone call where audio transmitted from the user is monitored to detect indications of user input such as keypress tones or speech meaningfully processed by voice recognition functionality. In one embodiment, a user interface device utilized by processing of block 2834 may be a personal computing apparatus such as a notebook or tablet computer. In such an embodiment, presentation of information to the user may principally utilize a display screen of the device, and interactive elements may include interactive components visualized on the display screen and backed by processing logic to meaningfully receive and react to user inputs signaled with a keyboard, touchpad, mouse, touchscreen, microphone, or other user interface input mechanism, that are targeted to the visualized interactive component. Well known graphical user interface (GUI) systems and functionality may be utilized for this processing. Many embodiments are possible. When the user selection processing of block 2834 is complete, processing may proceed to block 2836.

At block 2836, a determination is made as to whether any one or more actions of the modeled output require user input indicating approval before invocation of the action. If not, processing proceeds to block 2842. If so, processing proceeds to block 2838. In one embodiment, the processing of block 2838 mimics the processing already described for block 2834, but adapted to the objective of receiving indications of user approval rather than indications of user selection. In one embodiment the processing of block 2838 includes invoking the functionality of a security system, authorization system, role-based access control (RBAC) system, or such, in which the recommended action of the model result requiring user approval is defined as a resource and the credentials of the approving user are checked for authorization to that resource. Accordingly, in such an embodiment, the user approval processing of block 2038 may essentially represent, in whole or in part, user authorization processing. Many embodiments are possible. At the completion of the processing of block 2838, processing may proceed to block 2842.

At block 2842, a determination is made whether an action recommendation of the model result (perhaps, a selected and approved action recommendation) is an action to be automatically performed. Such a determination may be made using information of the model output alone or in combination with other information available to the NEPS. If so, processing proceeds to block 2846. If not, processing proceeds to block 2844.

At block 2844, a non-automatic action recommendation of a modeled result may be placed in a queue. In one embodiment, the queue may be specific to a particular notable event instance and may be included in an enhanced notable event data instance that represents or corresponds to the underlying notable event instance. In one embodiment, a single queue for the NEPS may gather all of the nonautomatic recommended actions of modeling results. Many embodiments are possible. In one embodiment, actions queued by the processing of 2844 may be subjected to subsequent processing which may result in the performance of the queued action or its deletion from the queue. Many embodiments are possible.

At block 2846 a determination is made whether an action recommendation of the model result (perhaps, a selected, approved, and automatic action recommendation) meets certain standards defined to and enforced by NEPS processing. (In one embodiment, block 2846 may include processing to modify or adjust an action recommendation, possibly within prescribed bounds, to comply with defined standards.) If so, processing proceeds to block 2848. If not, processing proceeds to block 2844 where the standard-failing action is queued. As one example, a defined standard may be that no more than five server reboot actions may be performed within a 15-minute. In one embodiment, such standards may be represented by definitions that are built-in features of an NEPS. In one embodiment, such standards may be represented by definitions that are populated at least in part by user inputs to a graphical user interface. In one embodiment, such standards may be built-in and/or user-defined. Many embodiments are possible. Useful categories of standards as may be enforced by the processing of block 2846 may include reversibility standards which gate the performance of an action based on some measure or indicator of its reversibility or the complexity thereof; permissions standards which gate the performance of an action based on some measure or indicator of the sensitivity, level or classification of a permission necessary to perform the action such as needing administrator (admin) privileges; intrusiveness standards which gate the performance of an action based on some measure or indicator of intrusion or impairment to a system component or user, such as may ascribe different intrusion measures for actions that entail sending an email, versus sending a text, versus a soft failover, versus a system reboot, etc.; and/or impact standards which gate the performance of an action based on some measure or indicator of a system component, user class, or such as may be impacted by the action, such as may ascribe different measures or indicators for actions that affect major processing systems versus minor processing systems, versus customers, versus employees, versus security components, versus informal informational requests, etc. In one embodiment, the defined standards are built in by the system developer. In one embodiment, the defined standards result from processing user interaction with one or more interfaces for that purpose. In one embodiment, defined standards may include developer-defind standards and user-defined standards. In one embodiment, certain defined standards may be automatically derived from other standards or system information. For example, in such an embodiment, an automatically defined standard implementing a round-robin assignment policy may be created where a first user-defined standard prohibits sequential assignments to the same technician and a second developer-defined standard implements load-balancing of assignment actions for notable event instances across eligible assignees in a relevant group. Many embodiments are possible.

At block 2848, processing is performed to signal, cause, initiate, invoke, trigger, or otherwise advance and/or complete the processing of the modeled action recommendation, or any preprocessing that in normal course advances toward the performance of the modeled action recommendation. In one embodiment, the processing of block 2848 may include sending an action message 2072 via network 104 to an action target which performs processing to advance toward a complete performance of the recommended action. In one example, the recommended action may be to reboot a router device, which is the action target 2070. In such an example, the processing of block 2848 may include generating and sending action message 2072 with the appropriate format and content to be recognized by the router as a proper reboot command. In one example, the recommended action may be to perform a controlled shutdown of the database subsystem. The database subsystem may not be equipped to initiate a controlled shutdown operation in response to an action message but may, for security reasons, require user input at a local keyboard to initiate such a shutdown. In such an example, the action target (or, initial action target) 2070 may be a user interface device that conveys instructions to a human technician or operator, and action message 2072 may include the proper format and content to produce a display at the action target instructing the operator or technician to initiate the controlled shutdown at the local keyboard. In one embodiment, action targets are external to the system implementing the NEPS processing, such as devices, systems, components, or such of a monitored system or environment. In one embodiment, action targets may be internal to the system implementing the NEPS processing and may include functionality monitor, process, and/or relay the action invocations as represented by a action messages. Many embodiments are possible.

FIG. 29 depicts a user interface display exhibiting triage model determinations in a navigable topology interface. Interface display 2900 of FIG. 29 represents a user interface display as may be caused to display during the operation of a service monitoring system, for example. Such a service monitoring system may perform processing as depicted and described in relation to monitoring system 1930 of FIG. 19 as may operate in conjunction with a notable event processing system such as 1940 of FIG. 19. Such a notable event processing system is presumed for this example to include functionality for triage model processing as already described and discussed. Interface display 2900 is shown to include system header and menubar 2910, application header and menubar 2912, and principal display area 2914. Principal display area 2914 presents a topology display and navigation interface of one embodiment. The presented topology uses nodes to depict services implemented in a monitored system/environment, and connecting lines to depict directional dependencies. Central service node 2930 of this example is used to represent a service of particular focus. Depending-on service nodes 2940 and 2942 of this example each represent a service as indicated by the topology to be operationally dependent on the service represented by central service node 2930. Depending-from service nodes 2920, 2922, and 2924 of this example each represent a service as indicated by the topology on which the service represented by central service node 2930 depends operationally. The service node representations of interface display 2900 may be interactive, for example, to enable user selection of a new service node to become the central service node. Additional considerations regarding embodiments of such topology visualizations with navigation aspects may be found, for example, in FIG. 75C and FIG. 75D and the related discussion of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2017-0046374 A1, entitled “Automatic Event Group Action Interface,” published Feb. 16, 2017, in respect of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 15/276,750, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference for all valid purposes.

Notably, three of the service nodes depicted in interface display 2900 of FIG. 29 are shown with adornment badges the content and appearance of which are determined, during processing to generate a representation for the interface display, based at least in part on triaging model results. In one hypothetical example, processing to generate display 2900 accesses data representing a set or subset of enhanced notable event data instances as may be associated with the service represented by a particular node. Such a subset may include, for example, the enhanced notable event data instances indicated to have an “unresolved” or “open” status.

In one aspect, the hypothetical processing to generate display 2900 accesses triaging model results of the set or subset of enhanced notable event data instances, determines the maximum result found from among the model results produced by a scoring model that predicts an urgency value, and conditions the selection of a badge shape based on that determination. For example, modeled urgency values for the set or subset of enhanced notable event data instances associated with the service represented by node 2930 included a maximum urgency value used to determine the star shape of badge 2932; modeled urgency values for the set or subset of enhanced notable event data instances associated with the service represented by node 2924 included a maximum urgency value used to determine the star shape of badge 2928; and modeled urgency values for the set or subset of enhanced notable event data instances associated with the service represented by node 2922 included a maximum urgency value used to determine the circle shape of badge 2926.

In one aspect, the hypothetical processing to generate display 2900 accesses triaging model results of the set or subset of enhanced notable event data instances, determines the median result found from among the model results produced by a scoring model that predicts a relevance value, and conditions the selection of a badge color based on that determination. For example, modeled relevance values for the set or subset of enhanced notable event data instances associated with the service represented by node 2930 produced a median relevance value used to determine the black color of badge 2932; modeled relevance values for the set or subset of enhanced notable event data instances associated with the service represented by node 2924 produced a median relevance value used to determine the black color of badge 2928; and modeled relevance values for the set or subset of enhanced notable event data instances associated with the service represented by node 2922 produced a median relevance value used to determine the orange color of badge 2926.

In one aspect, the hypothetical processing to generate display 2900 accesses triaging model results of the set or subset of enhanced notable event data instances, determines a count of the number of queued, unperformed, automatic-execution type results found from among the model results produced by relevant action models, and determines the badge text displayed. For example, qualifying action model results for the set or subset of enhanced notable event data instances associated with the service represented by node 2930 produced a count value of 3 used to determine the text of badge 2932; qualifying action model results for the set or subset of enhanced notable event data instances associated with the service represented by node 2924 produced a count value of 7 used to determine the text of badge 2928; and qualifying action model results for the set or subset of enhanced notable event data instances associated with the service represented by node 2922 produced a count value of 1 used to determine the text of badge 2926.

One of skill will appreciate that the general and specific examples discussed in relation to FIG. 29 serve to illustrate the usefulness of triaging model results in downstream processing both for their inherent informational value and for their use, directly or by derivation, to direct, control, condition, or otherwise influence processing operations of a notable event processing system or a monitoring system, for example. Many uses, implementations, and embodiments are possible, and the details and chosen examples do not limit or constrain the practice of inventive aspects taught herein.

FIG. 30 depicts a user interface display exhibiting triage model determinations in a notable event triaging interface. Interface display 3000 of FIG. 30 represents a user interface display as may be caused to display during the operation of a notable event processing system or an associated monitoring system. A user interface display such as interface display 3000 may be effected during processing to visualize notable event related information to a system user and to enable the user interact with live notable event instances or their representations. Such user interactions in an embodiment may be useful for introducing user inputs into automated administrative processing for notable events (e.g., status changes), into automated workflow processing for the resolution or disposition of notable events, and/or into other automated system processing related to notable events. In in one embodiment, such automated processing may be automatic, semiautomatic, manual, or hybrid. Embodiments may vary.

User interface display 3000 of FIG. 30 is shown to include system header and menubar 3010, application header and menubar 3012, triaging display header information area 3014, and triaging display detail information area 3016. Triaging display header information area 3014 is shown to include a display title 3020, “NOTABLE EVENT TRIAGE”, and a number of interactive elements enabling a user to trigger or determine processing affecting content or formatting of detail information area 3016. Interactive component 3022 is illustrated as an interactive checkbox (in the checked or selected state) with the label, “Show Low Relevance results”, which may enable a user of the embodiment to signal an indication of whether low relevance results should be included or excluded from detail information area 3016 by the processing which generates and causes the display of interface 3000. In an embodiment, low relevance results may be notable event instances (or groups) that each have an associated modeled relevance value produced by an execution of a score-type triaging model against the event or group that falls below a certain threshold. In an embodiment, such a threshold may be a fixed, constant, built-in, or hardcoded value, a systemwide parameter value determined by an administrator, a user-specified value reflected in a user profile, or any other appropriate value source. Interactive component 3024 is illustrated as an interactive checkbox (in the checked or selected state) with the label, “Show High Relevance Events from event groups”, which may enable a user of the embodiment to signal an indication of whether high relevance notable event instances that are part of an event group should be broken out for individual display from the event group. In an embodiment, high relevance events may be notable event instances that each have an associated modeled relevance value produced by an execution of a score-type triaging model against the event that exceeds a certain threshold. In respect of the illustrated example, the relevant threshold value may be indicated by the user through interaction with interactive component 3028. Interactive component 3028 is illustrated as an interactive slide control with: a virtual slider slot indicating the range of slider movement; value indicators 0, 0.5, and 1 placed at the low, midpoint, and high positions, respectively, along the virtual slider slot; and a virtual interactive slider control knob which may be repositioned along the virtual slider slot by user interaction to indicate the threshold value for determining “high relevance” events. Interactive component 3026 is illustrated as an interactive checkbox (in the checked or selected state) with the label, “Show recent auto-executes”, which may enable a user of the embodiment to signal an indication of whether notable events for which modeled actions have been automatically performed should be excluded from detail information area 3016 at the initiation or completion of the automatic action or whether they should continue to be included in detail information area 3016 for some period of time (equating to “recent”) thereafter.

Triaging display detail information area 3016 is shown to include information presented in a tabular format. Row 3050 is a column heading row containing identifiers, field names, designators, semantic descriptions, associated keys, or such, applicable to the values appearing in the corresponding column in the subsequent data rows. Each data row implements a table entry corresponding to a notable event instance, perhaps as represented during processing by an enhanced notable event data instance. Data rows include rows 3052, 3054, 3056, 3058, 3060, 3062, 3064, 3066, and 3068.

The column headings shown in row 3050 include “Severity” in column 3030 indicating that the values in the column indicate a severity, criticality, or importance designation or measure ascribed to the notable event represented in the data row; “Event Group” in column 3032 indicating that the values in the column relate to a group of which the notable event represented in the data row is a member, and may include an identifier for the event group (e.g., G0421753) and a count of the members in the event group (e.g., 25), for example; “Event Type Code” in column 3034 indicating that the values in the column identify an event type, class, category, or such, that subsumes, represents, or is otherwise associated with the notable event represented in the data row; “Event Description” in column 3036 indicating that the values in the column represent a description of the notable event instance represented in the data row; “Modeled Relevance” in column 3038 indicating that the values in the column were produced by executing a score-type triaging model for a predictive relevance measure against the notable event represented in the data row; “Modeled Action” in column 3040 indicating that the values in the column were produced by executing at least one action-type triaging model against the notable event represented in the data row; “Approved” in column 3042 indicating that the contents in the column relate to user inputs for approving modeled actions associated with the notable event represented in the data row; “Execute” in column 3044 indicating that the contents in the column relate to user inputs or performance of modeled actions associated with the notable event represented in the data row; “Confirm” in column 3046 indicating that the contents in the column relate to user confirmation of user inputs or defaults appearing in other columns of the data row representing a notable event; and “NE Source” in column 3048 indicating that the values in the column identify a source of the notable event represented in the data row and may include values as illustrated such as “REST” indicating a representational state transfer (RESTful) interface for injecting notable event information into the system as the source, “EXTTKT” indicating an external trouble ticketing system as the source, “CORRSRCH” indicating a correlation search execution of a monitoring system as the source, and others.

Header row 3050 is also shown to include interactive element 3084 in “Confirm” column 3046. Interactive element 3084 is illustrated as an interactive button labeled “ALL” which may enable a user to signal confirmation of user inputs or defaults appearing in other columns of all the data rows representing notable events. Such generalized confirmation processing stands in contrast to the specific confirmation processing that may result through user interaction with an interactive button labeled “confirm” appearing in a data row, such as “confirm” button 3082 of row 3058, where interaction with a “confirm” button such as 3082 results in confirmation processing only as to user input or default values indicated for the row in which the button appears. In an embodiment, user interaction with general confirmation button 3084 or a specific confirmation button such as 3082 may invoke processing that includes disabling relevant confirmation button(s) and related user input controls, or replacing relevant confirmation button(s) with a timestamp indicating the time of confirmation such as timestamp 3088 in column 3046 of row 3060, which presumably for this example replaced the earlier presentation of a row-specific “confirm” button such as 3082.

In one embodiment, timestamp 3088 may not have resulted from processing associated with a specific user interaction but rather from processing to automatically invoke a modeled action. In the example presented by row 3060 according to the embodiment, an empty column 3042 indicates that the modeled action, “Assign to DB,” did not require user approval, and the “Auto” designation 3086 in column 3044 indicates that the modeled action was configured for automatic performance. In accordance with the example, processing ensued so that (i) the affirmative automatic selection of the modeled action was indicated by checkbox 3080, which checkbox is shown in a grayed-out or disabled state preventing interaction by the user to make changes, (ii) the modeled action was presumably at least invoked, and (iii) the timestamp “14:24:55” was recorded and incorporated as display value 3088 of user interface display 3000. Other embodiments are possible.

Row 3052 illustrates an example where, according to one embodiment, the modeled action requires processing to determine a user's approval, which approval may be signaled by a user through interaction with checkbox 3070. The presence of checkbox 3070 in column 3042 is suggestive of the defined need for a user approval for the modeled action. Checkbox 3070 of interface display 3000 is shown to be accompanied by a green star icon 3074. Such a green star icon appearing in interface display 3000 may indicate in an embodiment that a related user selection or interaction component is a recommended selection or interaction, or corresponds to a modeled action that is a recommended modeled action. In an embodiment, a recommended status value used in processing to determine, condition, or effect the presentation of a green star icon in interface display 3000 may be included in a modeled result or be derived therefrom. Row 3052 further illustrates an example where, according to an embodiment, the modeled action is such as may be caused, initiated, invoked, triggered, performed, or otherwise advanced toward its performance and completion by automated processing of the notable event processing system, related monitoring system, or other coupled system, apparatus, component, or the like. The presence of a checkbox in column 3044 is suggestive of the defined, determined, or otherwise known executability of the modeled action. In an embodiment, user interaction with a checkbox of column 3044 may signal user identification or selection of a modeled action to be executed. In an embodiment, a desire signaled by a user to execute a modeled action may engage processing that invokes the modeled action after an affirmative selection in column 3044 is subjected to confirmation processing invoked by user interaction with an element of column 3046.

Row 3054 illustrates an example where, according to one embodiment, the modeled action requires processing to determine a user's approval but which is not invokable by automated processing. Checkbox 3072 in column 3042 includes an “X” indicating a selected state. In one embodiment, such a selected state may be a default value for a recommended modeled action as indicated by the companion green star icon. In one embodiment, such a selected state may only result through user interaction to reduce the possibility for the unintended performance of modeled actions by requiring deliberate, affirmative user input to signal an approval. Many embodiments are possible.

Row 3056 illustrates an example where, according to one embodiment, multiple actions are included among the model results. The first two modeled actions 3076 appearing in column 3040 are indicated to be mutually exclusive options by the use of interactive radio button control elements to signify their selection states. The second of the two options is shown to be in the selected state perhaps because of its recommended status as indicated by the companion green star icon. The remaining modeled actions appearing in column 3040 are not indicated to be mutually exclusive options as evidenced by the use of interactive checkboxes to signify their selection states. While in the example of row 3056 mutually exclusive modeled actions are suggested not to be invokable by automated processing, and the nonexclusive modeled actions are suggested to be invokable by automated processing, the correlation is coincidental to the hypothetical example and may not be a requirement imposed by an embodiment.

Row 3058 illustrates an example where, according to one embodiment the modeled action requires no approval and is executable, however, execution is not configured to be automatic. Checkbox 3078 and column 3044 is shown to be in the selected state. The selected state may be the result of the recommended status of the modeled action as indicated by the companion green star icon, or may be the result of user interaction with checkbox 3078. Regardless, in an embodiment, execution, though selected for the model action, will not be incited or invoked before user confirmation is determined as by the processing of user interaction with an element such as 3082 of column 3046.

One of skill will appreciate after consideration of the user interface 3000 of FIG. 30, the related description thereof, and the examples discussed therewith, some of the many aspects that exist for using triaging model results for their informational value including in displays to system users and for their employment to direct, control, condition, or otherwise influence operational processing of a system. One of skill appreciates that many embodiments are possible and the practice of inventive aspects disclosed herein is not limited by the examples and details of illustrative embodiments.

Interface display 3000 of FIG. 30 is also shown to include display portion 3090 which is repeated in an enlarged form in FIG. 31 to illustrate additional user interface functionality related to interface display example 3000 of FIG. 30.

FIG. 31 depicts a user interface display exhibiting triage model rationale information. The interface display depicted by FIG. 31 represents display portion 3090 of interface display 3000 of FIG. 30 as it might appear during the course of certain user interaction. In this example, a user may utilize a human interface device or component such as a mouse, touchpad, touchscreen, or similar, to position a cursor 3102 over a modeled action descriptor or identifier such as the “Reboot ROUTER3” descriptor as it appears in FIG. 31, reflecting the content of row 3058 of FIG. 30 at column 3040. In an embodiment, maintaining the cursor at such a position for a period of time may trigger hover-over event processing associated with the displayed descriptor. In an embodiment, the hover-over event processing may cause the display of a pop-up display component such as callout box 3104 of FIG. 31. Callout box 3104 may be populated from information retrieved, for example, from a model result entry of an enhanced notable event data instance corresponding to the notable event instance represented by the row containing the descriptor to which the cursor points. For example, callout box 3104 may be populated from information retrieved from model rationale description 2142 of model result entry 2130 as depicted in FIG. 21. In one embodiment, the callout box may display rationale description information of enhanced notable event data without any conversion, transformation, modification, or such, any more than necessary to achieve its display. In one embodiment, the callout box may display a converted, transformed, modified, or otherwise derived representation of rationale description information of enhanced notable event data. In one embodiment, the production of such a derived representation may include recasting information of the rationale description into a natural language form. In one embodiment, the production of such a derived representation may include ranking items of the rationale description information and including only a maximum number of the highest ranked items. Many embodiments are possible.

FIG. 32 depicts a system diagram illustrating integration of notable event processing and event group processing in one embodiment. Such event group processing may be a component part of a monitoring system, for example, that permits the consolidation of perhaps numerous notable events under a group identification. The group identification may then be used in various representations or processing as a single substitute, alternative, or representative, for perhaps a large number of individual notable event treatments that might otherwise be required. Additional considerations regarding embodiments related to event group processing may be found, for example, in FIG. 34ZD1 through FIG. 34ZD10 and the related discussion of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2017-0046374 A1, entitled “Automatic Event Group Action Interface,” published Feb. 16, 2017, in respect of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 15/276,750, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference for all valid purposes.

System 3200 of FIG. 32 is shown to include notable event data collection 3210, grouping data store 3230, user interface apparatus 3202, and related processing. Notable event data collection 3210 is depicted as a set, group, collection, aggregation, or the like of multiple notable event data instances. Such an instance is shown to include a notable event data portion 3212 and a related enhancement data portion 3214. It may be appreciated that such an instance may be embodied as an enhanced notable event data instance such as 2100 of FIG. 21 where the notable event data portion 3212 of FIG. 32 corresponds to initial notable event instance data 2110 of FIG. 21 and the related enhancement data portion 3214 of FIG. 32 corresponds to the remainder of the content shown for enhanced notable event data instance 2100 of FIG. 21.

The processing represented by block 3220 of FIG. 32 includes processing to determine triaging model outputs for notable event instances. Such may be certain processing, such as Phase 3 processing, depicted and previously discussed in relation to FIG. 27, FIG. 28, and block 2060 of FIG. 20, for example. System 3200 of FIG. 32 shows that notable event data collection 3210 is both an input and an output for the processing of block 3220, particularly suggesting that model outputs determined in relation to particular notable event instances are reflected in data collection 3210, perhaps as enhancement data 3214.

The processing represented by block 3222 of FIG. 32 includes processing to determine event group membership for notable event instances. Grossly stated, the processing of block 3222 puts notable events into groups. Configuration data 3234 of grouping data store 3230 may provide information that directs, controls, or conditions the processing of block 3222. Such configuration data may include, for example, criteria for identifying notable event instances that should be related in a group. System 3200 of FIG. 32 shows that notable event data collection 3210 is both an input and an output for the processing of block 3222. Notable event data collection 3210 may serve as an input to the processing of block 3222, for example, by providing the processing of block 3222 with instances of notable events for which to determine group membership. Notable event data collection 3210 may serve as an output to the processing of block 3222, for example, by providing the processing of block 3222 with a storage location to indicate the current group membership of a notable event instance, in one embodiment. The processing of block 3222 may maintain group membership information, perhaps including a notable event instance identifiers, as membership data 3236 of grouping data store 3230, in an embodiment. Arrow 3228 of the depiction of system 3200 indicates that in addition to the primary output of the processing of block 3222, i.e., assignments of notable event instances into notable event groups, instrumentation functionality included in or related to the processing of block 3222 may generate telemetry data regarding group membership assignments and/or the determination thereof, which may be reflected in a notable event data collection 3210, in the illustrated embodiment.

Because the determined model outputs for notable event instances as created by the processing of 3220 of system 3200 are reflected as enhancement data 3214 for a particular notable event instance 3212, and because the processing of block 3222 to determine event group membership has access to such enhancement data in the course of its processing, system 3200 represents an embodiment where triage model processing may be integrated with event group processing, particularly at the group membership determination phase, as mediated through notable event data collection 3210. In such an embodiment, certain of configuration data 3234 may indicate or define what or how triaging model outputs reflected in enhancement data 3214 are to be used to direct, influence, or condition group membership determinations made by the processing of block 3222. In an embodiment, configuration data 3234 may include information that is built-in or otherwise provided by a software vendor. In an embodiment, configuration data 3234 may include user-defined information. Such user-defined information may be created and maintained by relevant functionality of the processing of block 3224.

In an embodiment, processing of block 3224 may cause the display of interactive user interface components on a user interface device such as 3202 that enable a user to respond with indications of desired configuration data such as notable event grouping criteria, for example. Other aspects of functionality of block 3224 may include processing to effect workflow operations in regards to notable event groups and their members, lifecycle operations in regards to notable event groups, and such. Such other aspects of the functionality of block 3224 may include processing to effect useful user interaction via a user interface device such as 3202. Many embodiments are possible.

FIG. 33 depicts a user interface display having interactive elements related to an integration of notable event processing and event group processing in one embodiment. Interface display 3300 represents in interface display as might be presented on a user interface device during a course of processing to create or maintain command/configuration/control data of a system that conditions, controls, or directs operational processing performed by a system to establish or maintain the membership of notable event groups. Display interface 3300 may be an expansion or adaptation, for example, of a user interface display such as 90900 of FIG. 34ZD2 of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2017-0046374 A1, entitled “Automatic Event Group Action Interface,” published Feb. 16, 2017, in respect of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 15/276,750, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference for all valid purposes, as it is there illustrated and discussed. Interface display 3300 of FIG. 33 is shown to include system title bar 3310 and application menu/navigation bar 3312. Interface display 3300 of FIG. 33 is further shown to include triage determination criteria section 3320 which may be used to incorporate triage modeling results into the filtering criteria used by an embodiment to determine event group membership. Triage determination criteria section 3320 is shown to include section header 3322 displaying the text “Split events by triage determinations”, which may enable user interaction to selectively collapse or expand the presentation of section 3320. Triage determination criteria section 3320 is shown to further include section body 3324.

Section body 3324 is shown to include multiple interactive components. User interaction with such components, in an embodiment, may cause underlying or related processing functionality to condition or direct its processing in response to the user interactions. Such conditioned or directed processing may, at least in part, determine the content of certain command/configuration/control (CCC) data of a system, which CCC data conditions, controls, or directs operational processing performed by a system to establish or maintain the membership of notable event groups. While sometimes discussed in terms of resulting consequences or effects caused ostensibly by user action directly, one of skill appreciates that this shorthand form used to simplify the discussion actually implies a technological reality where the resulting consequences or effects are caused by automated processing, including the automated processing related to effecting user interfaces to deliver system outputs and receive system inputs necessary or desirable for achieving the objectives of the automated processing.

Section body 3324 is shown to include interactive component 3330 illustrated as a checkbox in the unselected state with the label “Split by Actions”. Interaction by the user with the checkbox of 3330 to place it in the selected state may establish appropriate CCC data to cause operational event group processing to utilize results from action-type triage models when determining event group membership. Additional interactive elements of 3324 enable a user to more further refine the specification of such processing. Interactive element 3332, for example, is illustrated as a radio button in the selected state with the label “Identical Default Actions”, and as such may establish appropriate CCC data to cause operational event group processing to place in their own event group the appropriate candidate notable event instances determined to have the same modeled default action. Interactive element 3334, as another example, is illustrated as a radio button in the unselected state with the label “Common Candidate Actions”, and may, if in the selected state, establish appropriate CCC data to cause operational event group processing to place in their own event group the appropriate candidate notable event instances determined to have a particular action in common somewhere among the determined action-type model results of each. Moreover section body 3324 includes additional interactive elements to further refine such “Common Candidate Actions” event group processing. Interactive element 3336, for example, is illustrated as a checkbox in the unselected state with the label “Limit to top [count] candidates”, where “[count]” is implemented as interactive elements for specifying a particular value for the count. The currently specified value for the count is presented by text box 3340 and the value may be changed by user interaction with spinner controls 3342. Accordingly, placing checkbox 3336 into the selected state in an embodiment may cause processing to establish appropriate CCC data to cause operational event instances determined to have a particular action in common somewhere among a highest ranking number of determined action-type model results of each, wherein that number is the count value indicated at 3340.

Section body 3324 is shown to include interactive component 3350 illustrated as a checkbox in the selected state with the label “Split by Relevance Score”. Interaction by the user with the checkbox of 3350 to place it in the selected state may establish appropriate CCC data to cause operational event group processing to utilize results from a score-type triage model that produces a relevance value when determining event group membership. Additional interactive elements of 3324 enable a user to specify an additional aspect of such processing. The additional aspect involves mapping the relevance value to a corresponding range so that the associated notable event instance may be added to the membership of a notable event group all the members of which have relevance values in the same range. Multiple slider component 3360 may be used to define the limits or extents of the various ranges. The example of FIG. 33 is discussed using an example depicting three ranges. More or fewer ranges are possible in an interactive element such as 3358 may be engaged by the user to adapt the user interface to specify an additional range. Multiple slider 3360 is shown to include a vertical virtual slot as may represent the full range of values possible for a relevance score in one embodiment. Multiple slider 3360 is shown with the labels 0.0, 0.5, and 1.0, at the lowest, middle, and highest positions, respectively, along the virtual vertical slot. Multiple slider 3360 is shown with three slider control knobs, 3372, 3374, and 3376. Slider control knob 3372 is colored red and is placed at the position corresponding to the value 0.5 along the slot. A colored band with red coloring extends along the slot from the 0.0 position up to slider control knob 3372 indicating the range of values specified by slider control knob 3372. Slider control knob 3374 is colored yellow and is placed at the position corresponding to the value 0.75 along the slot. A colored band with yellow coloring extends along the slot from the 0.5 position of slider control knob 3372 up to slider control knob 3374 indicating the range of values specified by slider control knob 3374. Slider control knob 3376 is colored blue and displaced at the position corresponding to the value 1.0 along the slot. A colored band with blue coloring extends along the slot from the 0.75 position of slider control knob 3374 up to slider control knob 3376 indicating the range of values specified by slider control knob 3376. Each of the ranges specified by the slider control knobs has a corresponding interactive element depicted as a checkbox that may be dynamically labeled according to the positions of the slider control knobs of 3360. The value range specified by slider control knob 3372 has corresponding interactive element 3352 shown in the unselected state and labeled with the value range “>0.00 and ≤0.50” on a red colored background to match the color of the corresponding slider control knob 3372. The value range specified by slider control knob 3374 has corresponding interactive element 3354 shown in the selected state and labeled with the value range “>0.50 and ≤0.75” on a yellow colored background to match the color of the corresponding slider control knob 3374. The value range specified by slider control knob 3376 has corresponding interactive element 3356 shown in the selected state and labeled with the value range “>0.75 and ≤1.00” on a blue colored background to match the color of the corresponding slider control knob 3376. In one embodiment, the selection states depicted for interactive elements 3352, 3354, and 3356, may establish appropriate CCC data to cause operational event group processing to add appropriate candidate notable event instances with modeled relevance scores in the range of 0.75 to 1.00 to the membership of a first notable event group, and to add appropriate candidate notable event instances with modeled relevance scores in the range of 0.50 to 0.75 to the membership of a second notable event group, and to ignore the creation of an event group for notable event instances with modeled relevance scores in the range of 0.00 to 0.50.

One of skill will appreciate by consideration of the foregoing illustrative and exemplary uses of modeled results in various aspects of processing related to event grouping. Again, one of skill understands that the practice of inventive aspects taught herein is not limited by the particular examples or details discussed in order to convey an understanding of inventive matter.

FIG. 34 depicts a user interface display manifesting elements related to a configured integration of notable event processing and event group processing in one embodiment. Display interface 3400 of FIG. 34 may include the presentation of elements related to certain event group processing that relies at least in part on results produced by executing triaging model instances against notable event instances, which results may be reflected in computer storage and associated in or with a representation of the corresponding notable event instance, including notable event instances placed into the membership of various notable event groups by the event group processing functionality of an embodiment. A substantial portion of the format and content depicted for interface display 3400 of FIG. 34, and implied related processing, may pertain without specific regard to any use or nonuse of triage model results produced by notable event processing system functionality in an embodiment. Accordingly, aspects of interface display 3400 not discussed below may be readily appreciated by consideration of a user interface display such as 91600 of FIG. 34ZD9 of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2017-0046374 A1, entitled “Automatic Event Group Action Interface,” published Feb. 16, 2017, in respect of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 15/276,750, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference for all valid purposes, as it is there illustrated and discussed.

Interface display 3400 of FIG. 34 is shown to include notable event/group list entries 3410 and 3420. Each of list entries 3410 and 3420 represents a notable event group having over 100 notable event instances in its membership as indicated by the information appearing at its respective position 3412. Each of list entries 3410 and 3420 is shown to display a merge arrow symbol or icon at its respective position 3414. The merge arrow symbol or icon of this illustrated embodiment may indicate earlier processing to determine one or more potentially useful options for regrouping or merging the memberships of the groups displaying the icon. List entry 3410 displays merge icon 3412 and list entry 3420 displays merge icon 3422. The interface display 3400 depicts a rendition of the interface display as it may occur at a time when a user as interacted with in interface device to place cursor symbol 3402 over one of the merge icons, in this case merge icon 3422, for a certain period. As a result of the cursor placement, the processing that implements and/or utilizes interface display 3400 may invoke certain hover-over event processing associated with the merge icons. In an embodiment, such hover-over event processing may cause the display of pop-up component 3430. Pop-up interface display component 3430 is shown to include the title “Regroup/Merge/options”, option selection interactive elements 3442 and 3444, processing option selection element 3432, and action button 3434. Each of option selection interactive elements 3442 and 3444 is depicted as an interactive checkbox in the selected state with a companion label or text element containing a description of the available user selectable option. In an embodiment, such available user selectable options are determined by event group processing that recognizes patterns of group membership and correlates those patterns to one or more adjustments to group existence and/or group membership, possibly identifying such candidate adjustments that have the greatest or some threshold usefulness to the processing of event groups according to some measure, perhaps, for example, a measure that favors a smaller number of active notable event groups while maintaining some minimum threshold of likely short-term resolution or dispatch. Many embodiments are possible. In the illustrative example of FIG. 34, such options generation or recommendation processing recognized that 120 of 150 events of a first group (e.g. as represented by entry 3410) and 175 of 180 events of a second group (e.g. as represented by entry 3420) have a common recommended action identified as “Ignore and Close” as produced for each of the events by triage model executions, and recommended the merger of those 295 events with the common recommended action as evidenced by its presentation for selection at 3442. In the illustrative example of FIG. 34, such options generation or recommendation processing also recognized that 29 of 150 events of a first group (e.g. as represented by entry 3410) and two of 180 events of a second group (e.g. as represented by entry 3420) have a common recommended action “Assign to GG” as produced for each of the events by triage model executions, and recommended the merger of those 31 events with the common recommended action as evidenced by its presentation for selection at 3444. Because the merger action of 3442 and the merger action of 3444 are depicted in the selected state in this illustrated example, user interaction with the “Merge Selected” action button 3434 may invoke processing to effect both of the described mergers. Because the “Removed from source” processing option represented at 3432 is also shown to be in the selected state, the merger processing will effectively “move” rather than “copy” the member events from their original group to the merged group. Accordingly, at the end of such merger processing the original first group exists with 120 and 29 of its 150 events relocated to merged groups leaving only one event in its membership which may, in an embodiment, entail processing to terminate the original first group leaving its sole member to stand as an individual notable event instance. At the end of such merger processing the original second group exists with 175 and two of its 180 events relocated to merged groups leaving only three events in its membership which may, in an embodiment, until processing to terminate the original second group leaving its three members to stand as individual notable event instances. At the end of such merger processing a new first merged group exists with 120 and 175, or 295 events in its membership all having a recommended action of “Ignore and Close”. At the end of such merger processing a new second merged group exists with 29 and 2, or 31 events in its membership all having a recommended action of “Assign to GG”. From the foregoing illustrative example of group membership reprocessing based on modeled aspects of member events one can readily appreciate the benefits of improved processing efficiency and effectiveness that may result by incorporating the use of modeled results in many aspects of processing related to notable events.

4.0. Computing System Architecture

FIG. 35 is a block diagram illustrating a high-level example of a hardware architecture of a computing system in which an embodiment may be implemented. For example, the hardware architecture of a computing system 9150 can be used to implement any one or more of the functional components described herein (e.g., metrics ingestion component 202, metrics catalog and search component 204, metrics analysis component 206, metrics sharing component 208, or metrics store component 210). The computing system 9150 can also be used to implement any of a forwarder, indexer, search head, data store, or a computing resource. In some embodiments, one or multiple instances of the computing system 9150 can be used to implement the technologies described herein, where multiple such instances can be coupled to each other via one or more networks.

The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. For example, the computing system 9150 includes one or more processing devices 9152, one or more memory devices 9154, one or more communication devices 9156, one or more input/output (I/O) devices 9158, and one or more mass storage devices 9160, all coupled to each other through an interconnect 9162.

The interconnect 9162 may be or include one or more conductive traces, buses, point-to-point connections, controllers, adapters, and/or other conventional connection devices. Each of the processing devices 9152 controls, at least in part, the overall operation of the processing of the computing system 9150 and can be or include, for example, one or more general-purpose programmable microprocessors, digital signal processors (DSPs), mobile application processors, microcontrollers, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or the like, or a combination of such devices.

Each of the memory devices 9154 can be or include one or more physical storage devices, which may be in the form of random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM) (which may be erasable and programmable), flash memory, miniature hard disk drive, or other suitable type of storage device, or a combination of such devices. Each mass storage device 9160 can be or include one or more hard drives, digital versatile disks (DVDs), flash memories, or the like. Each memory device 9154 and/or mass storage device 9160 can store (individually or collectively) data and instructions that configure the processing device(s) 9152 to execute operations to implement the techniques described above.

Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer (e.g., processing devices 452). Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, the computer system 9150 will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices.

Each communication device 9156 may be or include, for example, an Ethernet adapter, cable modem, Wi-Fi adapter, cellular transceiver, baseband processor, Bluetooth or Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) transceiver, or the like, or a combination thereof. Depending on the specific nature and purpose of the processing devices 9152, each I/O device 9158 can be or include a device such as a display (which may be a touch screen display), audio speaker, keyboard, mouse or other pointing device, microphone, camera, etc. Note, however, that such I/O devices 9158 may be unnecessary if the processing device 9152 is embodied solely as a server computer.

The computing system 9150 can include clients or servers. A client and server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other. In the case of a client device, the communication devices(s) 9156 can be or include, for example, a cellular telecommunications transceiver (e.g., 3G, LTE/4G, 5G), Wi-Fi transceiver, baseband processor, Bluetooth or BLE transceiver, or the like, or a combination thereof. In the case of a server, the communication device(s) 9156 can be or include, for example, any of the aforementioned types of communication devices, a wired Ethernet adapter, cable modem, DSL modem, or the like, or a combination of such devices.

Embodiments of the subject matter and the functional operations described in this specification can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. Embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer program products, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a computer readable medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus.

A software program or algorithm, when referred to as “implemented in a computer-readable storage medium,” includes computer-readable instructions stored in a memory device (e.g., memory device(s) 454). A processor (e.g., processing device(s) 452) is “configured to execute a software program” when at least one value associated with the software program is stored in a register that is readable by the processor. In some embodiments, routines executed to implement the disclosed techniques may be implemented as part of OS software (e.g., MICROSOFT WINDOWS® or LINUX®) or a specific software application, algorithm component, program, object, module, or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.”

The computer readable medium can be a machine readable storage device, a machine readable storage substrate, a memory device, a composition of matter effecting a machine readable propagated signal, or a combination of one or more of them. The term “data processing apparatus” encompasses all apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers. The apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a data store management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of them, a propagated signal is an artificially generated signal, e.g., a machine generated electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signal, that is generated to encode information for transmission to suitable receiver apparatus.

A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) typically includes one or more instructions set at various times in various memory devices of a computing device, which, when read and executed by at least one processor (e.g., processing device(s) 9152), will cause a computing device to execute functions involving the disclosed techniques. In some embodiments, a carrier containing the aforementioned computer program product is provided. The carrier is one of an electronic signal, an optical signal, a radio signal, or a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium (e.g., the memory device(s) 9154).

A computer program can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a standalone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., on or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub-programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.

The computer system 9150 can be embedded in another device, e.g., a mobile telephone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a mobile audio player, a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver, to name just a few. Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of nonvolatile memory, media, and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto optical disks; and CD ROM and DVD ROM disks. The processor (e.g., processing devices 452) and the memory (e.g., memory device 9154) can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.

To provide for interaction with a user, architecture provider or reviewer, embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented with a display device of the I/O devices 9158, e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) to LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor, for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device, e.g., a mouse or a trackball, by which the user can provide input to the computer. Other kinds of I/O devices 9158 can be used to provide for interaction with a user, architecture provider or reviewer as well; for example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input from the user, architecture provider or reviewer can be received in any from, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input.

In some embodiments, the computing system 9150 can include a back end component (not shown), e.g., as a data server, or that includes a middleware component, e.g., an application server, or that includes a front end component, e.g., a client computer having a graphical user interface (e.g., metrics-aware UI) or a Web browser through which a user can interact with an implementation of the subject matter described in this specification, or any combination of one or more such back end, middleware, or front end components. The components of the system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digital data communication, e.g., a communication network. Examples of communication networks include a local area network (“LAN”) and a wide area network (“WAN”), e.g., the Internet.

5.0. Terminology

Depending on the embodiment, certain acts, events, or functions of any of the algorithms described herein can be performed in a different sequence, can be added, merged, or left out altogether (e.g., not all described acts or events are necessary for the practice of the algorithm). Moreover, in certain embodiments, acts or events can be performed concurrently, e.g., through multi-threaded processing, interrupt processing, or multiple processors or processor cores or on other parallel architectures, rather than sequentially.

All of the processes and steps described above as may be performed and fully automated by a computer system. The computer system may include multiple distinct computers or computing devices (e.g., physical servers, workstations, storage arrays, etc.) that communicate and interoperate over a network to perform the described functions. Each such computing device typically includes a processor (or multiple processors) that executes program instructions or modules stored in a memory or other non-transitory computer-readable storage medium or device. The various identification and marketing service functions disclosed herein may be embodied in such program instructions, although some or all of the disclosed functions may alternatively be implemented in application-specific circuitry (e.g., ASICs or FPGAs) of the computer system. Where the computer system includes multiple computing devices, these devices may, but need not, be co-located. The results of the disclosed methods and tasks may be persistently stored by transforming physical storage devices, such as solid-state memory chips and/or magnetic disks, into a different state.

Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.

Systems and modules described herein may comprise software, firmware, hardware, or any combinations of software, firmware, or hardware suitable for the purposes described herein. Software and other modules may reside on servers, workstations, personal computers, computerized tablets, PDAs, and other devices suitable for the purposes described herein. Software and other modules may be accessible via local memory, via a network, via a browser, or via other means suitable for the purposes described herein. Data structures described herein may comprise computer files, variables, programming arrays, programming structures, or any electronic information storage schemes or methods, or any combinations thereof, suitable for the purposes described herein. User interface elements described herein may comprise elements from graphical user interfaces, command line interfaces, and other suitable interfaces.

Further, the processing of the various components of the illustrated systems can be distributed across multiple machines, networks, and other computing resources. In addition, two or more components of a system can be combined into fewer components. Various components of the illustrated systems can be implemented in one or more virtual machines, rather than in dedicated computer hardware systems. Similarly, various components of the illustrated systems can be implemented in other virtualization constructs, such as one or more containers (operating-system-level virtualizations) within a containerization framework like Docker by Docker, Inc., perhaps facilitated with a container orchestration facility like the open source Kubernetes, both widely known. Likewise, the data repositories shown can represent physical and/or logical data storage, including, for example, storage area networks or other distributed storage systems. Moreover, in some embodiments the connections between the components shown represent possible paths of data flow, rather than actual connections between hardware. While some examples of possible connections are shown, any of the subset of the components shown can communicate with any other subset of components in various implementations.

Embodiments are also described above with reference to flow chart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products. Each block of the flow chart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flow chart illustrations and/or block diagrams, may be implemented by computer program instructions. Such instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the acts specified in the flow chart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to operate in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the acts specified in the flow chart and/or block diagram block or blocks. The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operations to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the acts specified in the flow chart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

While certain embodiments have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure. Indeed, the novel methods and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms; furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the described methods and systems may be made without departing from the spirit of the disclosure.

Any or all of the features and functions described above can be combined with each other, except to the extent it may be otherwise stated above or to the extent that any such embodiments may be incompatible by virtue of their function or structure, as will be apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art. Unless contrary to physical possibility, it is envisioned that (i) the methods/steps described herein may be performed in any sequence and/or in any combination, and (ii) the components of respective embodiments may be combined in any manner.

Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as examples of implementing the claims, and other equivalent features and acts are intended to be within the scope of the claims.

While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular embodiments of the invention. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context or separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or variation of a sub-combination.

Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the embodiments described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all embodiments, and it should be understood that the described program components and systems can generally be integrated together in a single software product or packaged into multiple software products.

Thus, particular embodiments of the invention have been described. Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims. For example, the actions recited in the claims can be performed in a different order and still achieve desirable results. 

1. A method comprising: receiving machine data at a server group via one or more network connections from multiple machine data sources, the server group comprising one or more servers of a data intake and query system; reflecting the machine data as entries in a field-searchable datastore of the data intake and query system wherein each of the entries comprises a portion of the received machine data and a timestamp determined for the portion by the data intake and query system; determining a plurality of notable events, each notable event determined at least in part from a result of a search query addressing at least one of the entries, and reflecting each of the notable events in computer storage; and causing the display of a user interface comprising information about one or more of the notable events, wherein the presentation of the content of the user interface is determined at least in part from a modeled result determined for each of one or more of the notable events; wherein the machine data reflects the operation of a monitored system; wherein the method is performed by one or more processors.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with a score-type model.
 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with a score-type model having a numeric result.
 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with a score-type model having a categorical result.
 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with a score-type model having a categorical result and a numeric result.
 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with a score-type model having at least one from among a categorical result and a numeric result, and wherein the modeled result value indicates a degree of a characteristic from among relevance, priority, severity, criticality, and importance.
 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with an action-type model.
 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with an action-type model and the content of the user interface includes an interactive component enabling a user to trigger the performance of an action identified in the modeled result.
 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with an action-type model and the content of the user interface includes interactive components enabling a user to indicate at least one of approval and disapproval.
 10. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with an action-type model and the content of the user interface includes interactive components enabling a user to indicate a selection of an action identified in the modeled result.
 11. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with an action-type model and the modeled result includes an identification of an action with a recommended status.
 12. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with an action-type model and the modeled result includes an identification of an action for automatic execution.
 13. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with an action-type model and the modeled result includes an identification of a plurality of actions.
 14. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with an action-type model and the modeled result includes an identification of a plurality of actions wherein at least one of the plurality of actions is associated with a recommended status.
 15. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with an action-type model and the modeled result includes an identification of a plurality of actions and the content of the user interface includes a representation of at least one of the plurality of actions.
 16. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with an action-type model and the modeled result includes an identification of a plurality of actions and the content of the user interface includes a representation of each of the plurality of actions.
 17. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with an action-type model and the modeled result includes an identification of a plurality of actions, and wherein the content of the user interface includes a representation of each of the plurality of actions, the representation includes an interactive component enabling a user to indicate a selection state for the corresponding action.
 18. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with an action-type model and the modeled result includes an identification of a plurality of mutually exclusive actions.
 19. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with an action-type model and the modeled result includes an identification of a plurality of mutually exclusive actions and an indication of one of the plurality having a recommended status.
 20. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with a model having a self-referential component.
 21. The method of claim 1 wherein the modeled result is determined at least in part in accordance with a model represented by a definition including a model template definition and a model instance definition.
 22. The method of claim 1 wherein the presentation of the content of the user interface determined at least in part from a modeled result includes the relative presentation order of a plurality of representations of respective notable event instances.
 23. The method of claim 1 wherein the presentation of the content of the user interface determined at least in part from a modeled result includes a visual attribute determined by the modeled result.
 24. The method of claim 1 The method of claim 1 wherein the presentation of the content of the user interface determined at least in part from a modeled result includes a color attribute determined by the modeled result.
 25. The method of claim 1 wherein the presentation of the content of the user interface determined at least in part from a modeled result includes a shape determined by the modeled result.
 26. The method of claim 1 wherein the presentation of the content of the user interface determined at least in part from a modeled result includes a representation of a rationale included in the model result.
 27. The method of claim 1 wherein the presentation of the content of the user interface determined at least in part from a modeled result includes a representation of a rationale included in the model result in response to a hover-over event.
 28. The method of claim 1 wherein the presentation of the content of the user interface determined at least in part from a modeled result includes a representation of a rationale included in the model result presented in a pop-up user interface component in response to a hover-over event.
 29. A system comprising: a memory; and a processing device coupled with the memory to perform operations comprising: receiving machine data at a server group via one or more network connections from multiple machine data sources, the server group comprising one or more servers of a data intake and query system; reflecting the machine data as entries in a field-searchable datastore of the data intake and query system wherein each of the entries comprises a portion of the received machine data and a timestamp determined for the portion by the data intake and query system; determining a plurality of notable events, each notable event determined at least in part from a result of a search query addressing at least one of the entries, and reflecting each of the notable events in computer storage; and causing the display of a user interface comprising information about one or more of the notable events, wherein the presentation of the content of the user interface is determined at least in part from a modeled result determined for each of one or more of the notable events; wherein the machine data reflects the operation of a monitored system.
 30. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium encoding instructions thereon that, in response to execution by one or more processing devices, cause the one or more processing devices to perform operations comprising: receiving machine data at a server group via one or more network connections from multiple machine data sources, the server group comprising one or more servers of a data intake and query system; reflecting the machine data as entries in a field-searchable datastore of the data intake and query system wherein each of the entries comprises a portion of the received machine data and a timestamp determined for the portion by the data intake and query system; determining a plurality of notable events, each notable event determined at least in part from a result of a search query addressing at least one of the entries, and reflecting each of the notable events in computer storage; and causing the display of a user interface comprising information about one or more of the notable events, wherein the presentation of the content of the user interface is determined at least in part from a modeled result determined for each of one or more of the notable events; wherein the machine data reflects the operation of a monitored system. 